Archive for June, 2006
Dave Hits the Spot
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 06/30/2006
Dave writes:
Our colored enemies do not possess an argument; they possess permanently fixed inferiority.
And our white enemies do not possess an argument for they must answer to treason.
Let it be known that our injuries shall be requited wound for wound. And confessions shall be gained and payments made in humiliation
Nothing less than everything shall suffice for Bob’s mantra is forbearance to a reckoning that is owed and what is owed shall be paid.
Our enemies do not have a right to argument. For these 65 years they have said enough and they have had their say and by God we shall have ours.
Comment by Dave
MY REPLY:
YES! YES! YES!
Our white enemies must CONFESS to treason.
“Let it be known that our injuries shall be requited wound for wound. And confessions shall be gained and payments made in humiliation.”
God bless you, man!
I have lived a life of humiliation and you have promise to make them PAY for it. I remember hearing about a Progressive teaacher in Elizabethton, NC who FORCED a white high female white studnet to dance with a black. She was crying but no one came to her defense. I would have knocked the son of a bitch cold.
Like the Jews, FORGET NOTHING.
Dave is my hero, because he is the hero of our race who understandds everything.
Dave, you will be in on the kill. But you have pledged to me that you will no more forgive evil than the New Englanders did when the South was defeated, you will not forgive any more than the Jews forgave Germany. That is the opposite of what people like to say. But that is the only thing that works.
When a Southerner wanted anything after the Civil War he had to sign ANOTHER pledge of treason to the Confederacy, another pledge of loyalty to the Union. We ended up poverty stricken from the tariffs and the discriminatory rail rates for a century. Even our h istory has been stolen.
Why? Because you do not win on the day of surrender. You win when you grind it into their souls. They have wealth, take it. They have pride. Take it away from them for the humiliation they gave your comrades every day in every possible way.
As I always said, “There is nothing that is too bad to happen to an integrationist.”
Make their obvious and silly even a hot iron no one will ever dare touch again. Turn treason from today’s morality to tomorrow’s terror.
Thank you, Dave. You cannot imagine what you just did for me.
After the Kill
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session on 06/30/2006
I ended the last piece on this note, “Suck your thumb or be in on the kill.”
I have already been in on several kills. As I said, one of the joys of my life was standing onthe bridge across the Moscow River, looking back at the Kremilin after the Soviets had fallen, and giving it the bird:
“We DESTROYED you evil, silly bastards!”
Now, of course, everybody will tell me that wasn’t a victory. I won’t try to list all the “real problem” crap I get for saying that. The same is true for the fact that no one in academia today even bothers to object when Rushton and Jensen publish an article about how race is family. A few people I have been working with for decades wrote me about that great breakthrough, but only they know it.
All the effort I have spent fighting for these victories is put forward by those who insist they were not victories. Liberals and respectable conservatives will insist that they always believed that. Historians will write so that they always believed that. Most of the members of Stormfront will put forward endless effort to prove that those were not victories, and all is lost.
Meanwhile, those of us who won those victories while the John Birch Society frothed and the liberals shrugged live on the Panet Earth.
You know this fact: When taking the side of a hated truth is all cost and no benefit, only two types of people will stand on that side:
1) Those who are smart enough and experienced enough to see through it all, PLUS having the raw courage and Nordic dedication to truth for its own sake to take the world on, decade after decade
AND:
2) Nut cases.
The nut cases have no sense of reality. No matter what happens, they will still be nut cases. Their imaginary reality will be there until they die.
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, no war is ever completely won. We live ina world where all the meidda are still controlled by the enemy. So we have an obvious alliance here betweenthe crackpots on our side and the media. Both the media nad the “All is lost!” crackpots devote most of their time to proving that those of us who spend our lives in the thick of it never won a single victory.
Both agree that there is not even a struggle going on. The media say the Liberal Idealists always were for whatever won, and the “All is Lost!” crackpots say that the Evil Left foresaw every move and it all fits into the Pattern. I have been living in this nuthouse called hte Political Right for over fifty years. I have learned to tune out the screams of the innmates.
For God’s sake, if you can’t see we have done anything, then go SURRENDER and get behind me, Satan! I am sick of listening to you shriek every time I try to tell people how the battle should be fought.
Go away! Cry on somebody else’s shoulder. I am sick of you beyond the imagination of anyoone who has not listened to you for half a century.
I want to talk to sane people about how this war can be fought and won.
You can whine anywhere. You whiners nad the media can go anywhere else in this big, wide world. Us sane people only ask for a tiny space in which we can continue winning the victories you say are impossible.
Maybe I can break that down into language even you can understand:
GO AWAY!
After the Kill
I ended the last piece on this note:
I have already been in on several kills. As I said, one of the joys of my life was standing onthe bridge across the Moscow River, looking back at the Kremilin after the Soviets had fallen, and giving it the bird:
“We DESTROYED you evil, silly bastards!”
Now, of course, everybody will tell me that wasn’t a victory. I won’t try to list all the “real problem” crap I get for saying that. The same is true for the fact that no one in academia today even bothers to object when Rushton and Jensen publish an article about how race is family. A few people I have been working with for decades wrote me about that great breakthrough, but only they know it.
All the effort I have spent fighting for these victories is put forward by those who insist they were not victories. Liberals and respectable conservatives will insist that they always believed that. Historians will write so that they always believed that. Most of the members of Stormfront will put forward endless effort to prove that those were not victories, and all is lost.
Meanwhile, those of us who won those victories while the John Birch Society frothed and the liberals shrugged live on the Panet Earth.
You know this fact: When taking the side of a hated truth is all cost and no benefit, only two types of people will stand on that side:
1) Those who are smart enough and experienced enough to see through it all, PLUS having the raw courage and Nordic dedication to truth for its own sake to take the world on, decade after decade
AND:
2) Nut cases.
The nut cases have no sense of reality. No matter what happens, they will still be nut cases. Their imaginary reality will be there until they die.
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, no war is ever completely won. We live ina world where all the meidda are still controlled by the enemy. So we have an obvious alliance here betweenthe crackpots on our side and the media. Both the media nad the “All is lost!” crackpots devote most of their time to proving that those of us who spend our lives in the thick of it never won a single victory.
Both agree that there is not even a struggle going on. The media say the Liberal Idealists always were for whatever won, and the “All is Lost!” crackpots say that the Evil Left foresaw every move and it all fits into the Pattern. I have been living in this nuthouse called hte Political Right for over fifty years. I have learned to tune out the screams of the innmates.
For God’s sake, if you can’t see we have done anything, then go SURRENDER and get behind me, Satan! I am sick of listening to you shriek every time I try to tell people how the battle should be fought.
Go away! Cry on somebody else’s shoulder. I am sick of you beyond the imagination of anyoone who has not listened to you for half a century.
I want to talk to sane people about how this war can be fought and won.
You can whine anywhere. You whiners nad the media can go anywhere else in this big, wide world. Us sane people only ask for a tiny space in which we can continue winning the victories you say are impossible.
Maybe I can break that down into language even you can understand:
GO AWAY!
Soviet Silly
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 06/30/2006
When I got to the University of Virginia grad school of economics, everybody agreed that the Soviet Union was making huge strides toward overtaking the United States in production. I took the course in Soviet Economis taught by the one heretic on this subject, Warren Nutter. He became one of Barry Goldwater’s two economic advisors for the 1964 campaign, along with Milton Friedman. He was not one of the two Nobel Laureates who were in my faculty.
I say all this, once again, to point out why the man in line to become dean repeated publically that he planned “to clean out that nest of right-wingers in the Economics Department.” He was typical of the Free Speech Left in the 1960s. When he took over three years later and fired the faculty for its views not one liberal offered a breath of objection anywhere.
I point out the level of Nutter and others because there was no question of competence here. It was completely a matter of politics and nobody doubted it. In fact, when I went out into the job market, everybody knew that the University was one of the top economics departments in the world. If this had happened to a leftist, we would still be hearing about it. But it NEVER happened to a leftist.
Nutter went to the Soviet Union a lot. He saw the poverty there. He saw what Solzheitsyn saw, that the standard of living kept going DOWN, not UP. On the other side, tanged against him, was the entire profession of economics. Not only that, alined with the entire economics community was the Central Intellligence Agency. Like everybody else, the CIA insisted that the Soviet Union was hard on its people and crushed freedom, but it was making huge gains.
Nutter kept making hte argument they were being silly. But Nutter’s problem, like mine, was that the explanation for the mistake was so obvious a child could see it, but a bureaucracy couldn’t. Here it is:
If you and dozen other people set to build an automobile from the iron ore up, it will take you maybe a million hours of labor time. You have to learn everything. You have to learn every field of knowledge. You have to build every piece of equipment for transforming the metal, rubber, glass and everything else into forms usable in a car.
The Soviet Union had no price system. They measured everything in terms of Marxist economics. Marxist economics says that the value of every good is the “objective labor time” invested in it. Nutter used to explain to us how the Soviet Union tried to produce glass. The planners would order a factory to produce so many square inches. The result was glass that was so thin it literally felt apart when it was lifted. When they tried tonnage, it was too thick. Then they tried more and more specifications.
It is simple fact of life that the price system does all that. You know what glass is because if you produce glass people can’t use you can’t sell it. Doing without a price system is like doing without eyesight. You suddenly realize that trying to use hearing and touch have limitations you never considered before.
So for Communists, making glass is a problem but making a CAR is a nightmare. That’s what happened to the Yugo. They still were not used to the market. What one could get away with under Communism was dead on arrival in the free market.
So the first attempts at making automobiles were hilarious to Nutter, but not to the guys responsible. Stalin lacked a sense of humor about it. They got parts that woldn’t fit together when they tried to ASSEMBLE the car.
OK, they finally got a few cars. But the amount of labor time expended on each car, even ignoring the false starts, was astronomical. So how did they measure their car output? In terms of money paid for them?
Not bloody likely. The only market for Soviet cars was literally the captive market. NOBODY outside the USSR, Communists included, wanted a Soviet car. So, to repeat, how do you measure the car output?
In objective labor time. So a “car,” in Soviet terms, cost ten thousand hours or more in objective labor time. A car in the United States cost a member of the United Auto Workers maybe two hundred hours of his labor time, and most of hte money didn’t go to him. So as the Soviets, by copying American cars as best they could by translating them into quotas, made models that could not be sold outside the USSR in increasing numbers, each car went onthe Soviet production index as another ten thousand hours of objective labor time.
The Soviet Union has seventy seasons of bad weather throughout the Soviet period. A leftist or a CIA economist would look you straight inthe eye and tell you that. So a bushel of wheat took a hell of a lot more Objective Labor Time to produce on a Soviet Coolective or a State Farm than it had even with serfdom. This fact alone doubled the value of wheat produced inthe Soviet Union in terms of Soviet economics.
No one has EVER noticed this, but Soviet Russia was the ONLY white country in all of history that went through seventy yeras without producing one single new good that anybody outside the USSR was willing to buy. The biggest white NATION on earth! That is a feat only a bucnh of “intellectuals” could accomplish.
But in the 1960s, when the CIA was desperate to prove the Soviet threat and was full of pro-Soviets, when a professor not only could, but DID get fired for challenging this CIA-Soviet line, all this obvious stuff was heresy.
In those days, I would have sworn that exposure ofhte myth of Communist efficiency simply could never be overcome, b ut I stood solidly with the truth even when I was in intelligence.
At the same time, I would have sworn that the myth that was in absolute control, “Modern anthropology has proven that all races are equal in inhertied abilities” would NEVER be unseated. But I have seen it totally destroyed.
The statement now is that race doesn’t exist. But they use that as a cover for admitting that “groups” have huge heritable differences. They just aren’t races. They are east and went Africans and so forth. But Jensen and Rushton publish major articles now, and nobody even tries to shout them down inside academia.
By the time the USSR collapsed, it was generally admitted that the whole system was silly. Not incorrect, silly.
Inside the USSR, when Reagan called the Soviet Union an the Evil Empire, it made a huge difference. People living under it only kept a shred of respect for it because broadcasts from the West said it made some kind of sense. Harvard was a major factor in keeping hte Communist system alive. To CALL it evil, to CALL it silly, was destructive. The liberal howls at those adjectives should give you some idea that they were hitting home.
Nobody ever heard of our constant fight to break the “modern anthropologists have proven that all races are equal in inhertied characteristics” line. Liberals and liberatrians are still trying to prove that the Soviet Union broke during Reagan’s term in office because of sunspot activity or Yeltsin’s treason to the Communist cause. When the Communist kidnapping of Gorbeczev was under way, every libral I heard talking about it blamed the crackdown on Yeltsin.
That was all tossed into the Memory Hole three days later.
People need to hear that what is going on is as evil and as sillly as they think it is. That brings systems down.
An opposition that respects silliness and evil is the best friend that silliness and evil can ever have.
When you, alone, ask somebody “Why?” about the Big Lie of today, you, alone, are striking a blow that person will never forget. I have thought it was hopeless many, many times. But today no one can even understand WHY I thought it was hopeless. It’s so obvious now, you see. And when we had won the battle, some Ann Coulter or Bill Rusher or some neo repeated it and the revolution started there, you see.
There is no problem if you join the mob and give the wrong people CREDIT. I don’t mind that. But if you do that, you also have totally warped idea of HISTORY. You think you have a right to whine abouthow hopeless everything is, the way I did. I didn’t know I was MAKING history. But I didn’t discrouage my comrades by whining about how hopeless the whole thing was. What I truly did not realize was the power of subversion when something is silly and evil and no one says so.
You can make history. But you must ignore all the history books and all the official commentary. If you hammer away it spreads. The offical commentators are the LAST to use what you say. Almost every person you talk to, if you hit what we all know is true, will remember it. It gets around.
“If I had a hammer…”
I have a hammer. The Soviet Union did not survive the fax and the Internet. Academia today is on its way to being a laughingstock no one could have imagined a generation ago.
Suck your thumb or be in on the kill.
LibAnon
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 06/30/2006
Before I got this comment, I answered it in the latest pieces.
Joe is tough guy who has nothing in his whole life to apologize for. If you live in that world, I have nothing to tell you. Joe owes nobody anything, he has no loyalties, he is above it all. If you have Joe’s halo shining over your head, you sure as hell don’t need me.
I have been in on a lot of kills, but if you have no loyalties, none of them would mean anything to you. If you are above mere loyalties, you would have been wiser to have remained neutral through my whole fight.
The why is in you.
As far as I can see, the Truly Wise and Practical Man would never get out of bed.
So let me ask you, WHY would a Wise and Practical Man get out of bed?
NOT SPAM
“Your test is how much intellectual satisfaction you get from being here.”
Recently, there was an interesting pair of comments on one of your posts. One of the comments was mine, and the other one was Joe Rorke’s. What was interesting wasn’t the comments themselves, but the pairing, because Joe and I had almost exactly opposite reactions to what you said.
My comment was basically an expression of joy. I said, in essence, “Thank God! At last I have found a real graduate seminar! An intellectual feast! There’s intelligent life on this planet after all!” Joe’s was basically an expression of disgust. He said, in essence, “Bob’s Blog is a graduate seminar. Great. We sit around talking about how to talk. But are we ever going to DO anything?”
So taking, for the moment, Joe’s side instead of my own, and in Simmons’s spirit, I also ask “Why?” Why, indeed, are we talking about silly things like how to persuade approximately 200 million white Americans one by one? Why, especially given Bob’s experience, are we not talking instead about how to bring the illegal establishment of the PC religion in our educational system to the attention of Capitol Hill? Or how to get it before the Supreme Court? Or at least how to politically organize, like that “intelligent design” outfit in Seattle did, to the point that an American president has to say about PC, like Bush recently did about Darwinism, that “both sides should be properly taught”?
Comment by LibAnon
9 Comments