B. U. G. S.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

The problem “IS” we people have been conditioned to rely on goverment, churches and experts for solutions to all our problems. Theses organizations are rackets they make money and they are in business to stay in business so they intentionaly inflame the problems or institute solutions that favor the ststis quo. Real power rest with the people but the people of today are lazy and weak, they have a nanny state mentality.

NOT SPAM
“2) They stop viewing their institutions as a means to the end of racial survival, and begin to take the survival of the institutions themsselves as a goal in itself. So When the Democratic Party betrayed whites, when the National Party deserted whites, the whites inthose parties still stayed loyal to the Democrats and the National Party;”
The worst example of this is Zell Miller of Georgia, who spoke for Bush at the 2004 convention, opposes high taxes, opposes abortion, supports the death penatly, supports the war, opposes race-based affirmtive action, supported segregation in his day but now reversed his position…and still wouldn’t leave the Democratic Party because it was a “birthmark.” I mean seriously. How can you be more loyal to a name than to principles?

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“Whites decide that RACIAL survival must be justified in higher terms”

But why?

Pretending knowledge of a “higher truth” does not dispose of any fear, nor does it dispose of the reality of any threat.

Consequently, the motive for wordist justifications for white survival (“higher terms”) must lie in the need for consolation, an act of self-deception.

There is no difficulty in doing the right thing. The way to survival is easy to access. But there is no consolation in choosing survival. After all, you are choosing life with the whole cloth of its issues.

To me, entire nations (the Boers) who choose defeat at the behest of some sort of consolation are beneath contempt. Let them pretend the reality of their extinction, their humiliation, and their dereliction. Let us see how far their pretending goes.

I’ll be there happy to assist in drowning them, pushing their heads under water for a few minutes, letting them bob up to grasp a desperate breath of air, pushing their heads down again, and doing over and over again, just to enjoy it, just to enjoy watching them die slowly and in agony.

Now that may sound pretty crazy. But it’s just to let you know the contempt I have for the crap of people who choose consolation ahead of making sense.

BW is addressing very serious subjects here. There is a lot to what he is saying.

Let us pay attention to it. Let us really understand it. It’s important.

NOT SPAM

Pain feels the German army let down Germany, it was the German infrustructure that let down the entire German people. Bismark united the Germans in 1871, but the buracracy that came with it remained for the most part. In the modern age of high efficiency, Germany was still slow to adapt,she was a victim of her own inefficiency. Mass production and the free flow of material are essential for the modern army , Albert Speere was give the job of armaments minister in 1943, he cut throught most of this red tape and German out sored at the very time man power was waning, to little to late so to speak, in some ways the army did play a role in her defeat, but the Army did adopt a few modern concepts.
Blitzkrieg was one new concept that was hard fought to implement but was hamstrung by the old school of warefare. Only three men believed in it, Hitler, Manstein and Gurderian, considering what was accomplished with what they had at their disposal, there is little doubt that had the infrustructure been clean up by some one like Speer in 1939, German would have one the European war.

Not Spam
NOT SPam

Dave’s piece just blew me away. I’ve watched blacks during my 41 years and their only recourse to life is a proclivity to profanity and an inability to create new thought. They are a profane, near iliterate, repeater of words. And when that doesn’t work, they burn down their own neighborhoods. Dave needs his own blog. He’s way ahead of the pack.

Bob, You should not have told the Premise Checker about your blog unless you want your Premises Checked!
This whole debate over the rationale for White survival goes back to Richard Swartzbaugh in the my race vs. the race debate in the mid-1970s. A White my race racist urges the survival of the White race because it is his race. A White *the* race racist urges the survival of the White race because it is *the* race, the only race that matters.
Okay, there a plenty of White race racists who maintain that the White race is the creative race, that the world would stop moving forward if the top race were the Far Easterners and would move backward if the top race were one of the dumb races. (World IQ is 90.) This is support and would think that other races should support the survival of *the* race, since they benefit from having the world move forward, too. If the White race becomes explicitly racist and argues this case, maybe the other races are not so stupid or stubborn that they would not stop trying to kill of the goose that lays the golden egg. Actually, it’s only Whites that want to solve the race problem by eliminating Whites!
Now other White racists focus on admiring the things the White race has created in the past. Now, I’m no Roman Catholic, but I do admire the depth of the theological system that Whites constructed. Not that other races haven’t put out lots of theological rumble-bumble, but it’s not systematic. I was just browsing the web to find the texts of “Big Wheel Buddhism.” I found that the texts made little sense and was referred to articles by a professor who trys to put them in order. His name? Ronald Epstein! Since you are doubtless curious, here a link: http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/Buddhism/Yogacara/TRANSFORMATION%20OF%20CONSCIOUSNESS.htm
Hey, this is fun! If you want to find out about the 31 planes of existence, you’d have to tease them out of the sacred texts, but Susan Elbaum Jootla (it would seem a White person so enamored of this business she decided to upgrade the Buddhish gene pool by marrying one Jootla) has done it for you at http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/jootla/wheel414.html
Okay, so I prefer our race’s products, maybe like I thrill whenever someone from my high school or from U.Va. makes the news (Katie Couric had a room on the Lawn, in case you didn’t know, Bob.) and have not taken a Buddhist as a wife. (Actually, though, the woman I would have most resonated with at work was a Buddhist. Strange, highly intelligent. Her name: Lois Peak, that is before she changed it.) What’s important is not the products, as you so rightly insist, but the capacity to make more products. Conservative gloomists say this is not possible, but they never read the scientific news. They don’t shave either: razor blades have improved immensely in my lifetime, one of the little things that the White race does that go unnoticed.
Point is that my race racists have to be the race racists as well. Another reason is that racism itself is a White invention. You once wondered whether it was invented by the Slave Power to justify slavery. Had we been Papists, it wouldn’t have gotten off the ground, since in a stupendious act of rent-seeking, the Roman Catholic pope decreed in the early 15th century that American Indians had souls and hence missionaries should go there to keep them from going to Hell. Besides, racism is indeed a social construction, or learned activity, since our instincts are mostly to identify with those in our hunting band. This instinct was in place in the Olden Times. To identify with a whole race takes a society advanced enough to find out about the race in the first place. And even my race racists have to decide on the boundaries of White and non-White. Do they do this on my race or these race grounds? Probably both, which shows that it’s both the and my not one or the other.

NOT SPAM

From Pro-Israel former Bush speechwriter David Frum:

“There has been much anguish over whether to describe the new European anti-Zionism as “anti-semitism.” Judt, for one, evinces no animus against Jews as individuals or as a community. Indeed, he reports on the rise of anti-semitism in Europe in tones of sorrow – even as he makes clear that he believes that the Jews have brought this scourge upon themselves. “Today, non-Israeli Jews feel themselves once again exposed to criticism and vulnerable to attack for things they didn’t do. But this time it is a Jewish state, not a Christian one, which is holding them hostage for its own actions.” His intentions are high, his conscience is clear, he hates nobody. His solution, however, is one that would expose millions of Jews – and not just those living in the Middle East – to persecution, expropriation, political oppression, exile, and murder. We cannot describe this outlook as anti-semitism. We need some new term. Here’s my nomination: genocidal liberalism.”

Somebody like this could have been useful to South Africans:

There has been much anguish over whether to describe the new Western anti-apartheid sentiments as “anti-white.” Most political figures evince no animus against Whites as individuals or as a community. … Their intentions are high, their consciences are clear, they hate nobody. Their solution, however, is one that would expose millions of Whites – and not just those living in South Africa – to persecution, expropriation, political oppression, exile, and murder. We cannot describe this outlook as anti-White. We need some new term. Here’s my nomination: genocidal liberalism.