I just got another e-mail on Stormfront from someone who is also hitting the net with the Mantra.
He said the only thing they have to hide behind after The Mantra followed by “HERSY!” is that this may be genocide, but it involves no KILLING.
I told him to read the general UN Resolutions on Genocide and the Genocide Treaty. They declare any method of doing away with a group to be genocide, and only one among the many methods they mention involves actual killing.
He also said taht the world will be a better place when The Mantra is something “everybody know.”
It will be a better place then, and then will come the next standard Politically Correct tactic. They will start saying, “Oh, that’s the old Mantra thing.” Many of us will then stop using it because it will make us look out of fashion and boring. This will allow people to FORGET it.
Liberals always say, “oh, that’s the old ‘If Guns are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns’ thing.” So conservatives have stopped saying that. But it is TRUE, and no liberal can answer it, so they use the “old thing” tactic to shut it up.
Have you ever heard a Politically Correct person shut up about ANYTHING that works for his side, no matter how often we have heard it?
The idea is that every time a subject comes up that “old thing”, like “Nazis killed six million Jews” or “race doesn’t exist” or a hundred otehr things we have heard endlessly is THE FIRST THING COMES TO MIND when a subject comes up. That requires hammering it in SHAMELESSLY, ENDLESSLY.
NEVER stop repeating something that WORKS because they’ve heard it. MAKE THEM hear it again until “everybody knows” they’re WRONG.
#1 by timestre on 10/29/2006 - 4:35 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Hello Bob
I’ve tried to send you e-mails, but recieved no answer, so I’ll try here. I want to comment on your mantra. I’ve never heard the “race problem” used as a justification for third world immigration to Norway. Motivations behind third world immigration are typically that Norway needs a bigger workforce because the population is aging or that the immigrants are refugees who need protection. So where does this notion that immigration will solve the “race problem” come from?
From Norway
#2 by Tom on 10/29/2006 - 5:15 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
He must have found a pocket of semi-intelligent anti’s, the ones I encounter can not find their way past standard tactic number 1: DUHH! to which I repeat the mantra.
I took the time spreading the mantra one person at a time over the instant messenger AOL offers and Myspace. Sure it gave me some good practice but it just isn’t hitting a big of enough audience fast enough. Now I’m focusing my efforts more on my old neoconservative hang outs. I just finished posting the mantra on “rightwingnews” in relation to the border fence question and I’m anxiously waiting to see how the debate is going to turn in the comments section.
I’ll post again with more.
#3 by Alan B. on 10/29/2006 - 6:14 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob want us to keep knocking them down with the mantra punch, eventuall they will fail to get back up, never stop or turn your back on these PC creeps. Remember the PC crowd has the media, the universities, the coporate crowd and the money whores in washington on their side. Think about it, PC is such a huge fraud that it requires the entire establishment to keep this garbage from collasping like a house of cards. This is why its important to keep at them with the mantra, if one person heres it then they tell 5 more etc, etc. Eventually we will have the numbers to sweep this filth away.
#4 by Tom on 10/29/2006 - 7:29 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Alright gang, I’m back with more.
All my postings have been ignored, but Ive spent the past few hours looking for massive blog rolls and these three links seem to fit that description.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/links.html
http://neo-neocon.blogspot.com
http://www.vodkapundit.com
I haven’t scoured them thoroughly but I don’t think that they repeat.
#5 by Tom on 10/29/2006 - 8:54 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
By replying with standard tactic number 1: DUHH! You once again prove how predictable you anti’s are. You dance around the race issue but it is plain as day.
“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” -Harvard provessor Noel Ignatiev.
Everybody who says he is an anti-racist agrees with Ignatiev. They say they want to ‘solve the race problem’ by pushing immigration and integration on EVERY white country on earth other and ONLY on white countries.
They say intermarriage is the solution to the RACE problem. But this so-called RACE problem doesn’t exist in Asia or Africa. As Ignatiev said, they demand a final solution to the WHITE problem in exactly the same way that Hitler demanded a final solution ot the Jewish problem.
They call it anti-racism, i call it genocide.
“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
I’ve tried to send you e-mails, but recieved no answer, so I’ll try here. I want to comment on your mantra. I’ve never heard the “race problem” used as a justification for third world immigration to Norway. Motivations behind third world immigration are typically that Norway needs a bigger workforce because the population is aging or that the immigrants are refugees who need protection. So where does this notion that immigration will solve the “race problem” come from?
From Norway
Comment by timestre
#6 by timestre on 10/30/2006 - 6:18 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Unfortunately I don’t understand the first part of your comment. What do you mean with “By replying with standard tactic number 1: DUHH!”? Also, is “anti” the same as “anti-racist”?
Well, I don’t want third world immigration to Norway. Neither do I consider myself an “anti-racist”. How can I be “against” something which is a part of nature?
I’m just saying that in Norwegian public debate, of which this Harvard professor is not a part, I’ve never heard third world immigration to Norway justified with solving a “race problem”. We have been given other reasons, initially that we needed more workers and then that the immigrants are refugees who need protection.
So it seems that this notion of a “race problem” comes from America?