The fact that people don’t hear the exact words “race problem” doesn’t keep them from understanding exactly what it means. Let me repeat, the British National Party uses the Mantra all the time, and they are in Europe, too.
There simply weren’t any nonwhites to speak of in Europe until recently. Blacks have been here since 1619. So when we refer to “a race problem” it is an ongoing matter that has been normal in our discussions for centuries.
But that doesn’t mean a reasonably intelligent person can’t understand what the term means. I suspect this because here respectqable conservative routinely tell each other on discussion programs that “intermarriage isthe solution to the rce problem” and then, when we bring it up, they say, “DUHH! Me never heard such a thing!”
I cannot imagine a European who is able to write his name not understanding what the term MEANS. He using a variant on the “DUHH!” tactic: “Me never heard anybody SAY those worfds.”
So we are not retranslating the wordking to make an honst person understand it. We are putting in a way where they cannot deny they have SAID that. With an American I just call it “The DUHH! Tactic and it works. EVERYBODY here has heard “the solution to the RACE problem” in those exact words.
In Europe others will chime in and say they never heard “solving the race problem” either.
Adelheim’s wording is probably necessaary. By the way, Adelheim, I did not say you needed to translate it just into Norwegian. You need to translate it so that Europeans cannot DENY they know what you are saying.
That is why we need tenestre and Budarick and others in that environment to chime in here.
None of this is EASY work.
Recent Comments