I am reading the Nero Wolfe series, and I noticed that the author, Rex Stout, was big on “Negroes” even in 1938. So I checked hi biography and, sure enough, he was a committed leftie who refused to go before the House UnAmerican Activities Committee and explain his Communist Front connections.
But Stout ended his life being vilified by the left for his hawkish stance on Vietnam. The same thing happened to Ralph McGill, editor of the Atlanta Journal and a fanatical turncoat. The same thing happened to many other old lefties.
If you put the situation simply it sounds simplistic, but it is true. President Johnson announced proudly that the Vietnam War was being fought ENTIRELY for the Vietnamese. That was the Greatest Generation talking. He expected everyone to love him for it.
You see, the Greatest Generation got nothing but applause from Enlightened Opinion when they were giving away the Boomer Generation’s INHERITANCE. The got fat benefits for themselves first and then demanded that American whites give away everything else.
But by the 1960s, they were giving away the Boomer Generation ITSELF and the Boomers were no longer helpless infants. Every male Boomer had to build his life around the draft or go to Nam and faced the fight for their colored brothers.
The REAL youthful opposition to the Vietnam War was not the screaming Jews who were the media darlings. They were younger people who were conservative but did not see why they should lose even MORE for their colored brothers.
Wallace, not Nixon, sunk Humphrey in 1968. And Wallace had the largest percentage of young votes, despite the image of screaming Jews as the Youth of the 1960s.
No one has mentioned this before.
#1 by Dave on 03/24/2008 - 1:53 pm
This is important, because it gives us insight into the future.
The most important military outcome the Vietnam War was the termination of the draft.
This is something the nonmilitary half of the establishment cannot today come to terms with, for it altered the long standing social contract of tyranny with the American people that began with Lincoln’s tyranny and his Union draft.
Liberals, above all, hate the fact that the draft is dead. It gets in the way of their advocacy of treason.
This contradiction shows up in the blatantly politically motivated “moment of silence” the PBS Jim Lehrer News Hour performs showing pictures of recently killed American servicemen.
What Jim Lehrer and the PBS News Hour band of nitwit traitors forget is that these dead American soldiers picked up the gun on a voluntary basis.
They VOLUNTARILY signed on the dotted line accepting the Military’s jurisdiction over their lives.
When you pick up a gun a volunteer basis, you are a PLAYER in the world of violence.
No one need cry over YOUR sorry ass when you are killed or maimed.
This is a completely different ethic of soldiering than draft soldering.
It is a moral ethic of soldiering that bears no relation to the ethics that allow soldiers to be enslaved under draft laws. And it is the ONLY ethic of soldiering authorized by the American Constitution.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to be harmed by the enemy as a volunteer soldier. IMPOSSIBLE!!!
The fact that you stumbled in front of the enemy’s bullet or in front of the enemy’s bomb was YOUR OWN DAMN FAULT!!!
YOU volunteered to be a PLAYER in the world of violence. VOUNTEERED!!!
There is this damn Asian soldier (he claims to be an American) who has made a big deal out of being an Iraqi War resister. He has made a big splash with the anti-war nitwits, senile fools, living in a world that has been gone since 1975.
Nobody mentions that he VOLUNTEERED to accept the US military’s jurisdiction over his life. VOLUNTEERED. In reality he deserves execution for his treason.
To those who think, “all is lost”, just think about the huge progress made by the end of the legitimacy of the draft. This, in fact, was a great victory for our race.
It says everything about how we must focus.
When you stop caterwauling about being victimized and accept that duty is something you volunteer on behalf of YOUR (very own) convictions, you win the game.
When you realize that everyone is issued exactly one brain and that it must be used upon YOUR (very own) volition, on behalf of a freedom that it is YOUR (very own) responsibility to achieve, you are on the road.
That’s white people! That’s our real tradition!
White people, whether they know it or not, are walking that road and the fact that we ended the draft is proof of it.
And if you want to know how ruinous draft laws really are, look at “the Greatest Generation” and what they did to America.
They had the draft and they destroyed our country with it.
And the destruction of America is the real skinny on the “Greatest Generation”.
And if you really think they ever won even one battle in WWII, you don’t understand the reality of WWII at all.
No such thing ever happened.
#2 by Simmons on 03/24/2008 - 5:38 pm
Few are crying over Iraq. Its mostly out of sight out of mind except to the factions of world improving white/jewish liberal supremacists, and the authoritarians who blindly wave the flag. Iraq is basically meaningless save for the fact its bankrupting the current financial shenanigans our government has concocted. The authoritarians will be left holding the bag for the next generation of American cannon fodder “The Forgotten Generation.” Reminds me a couple of years ago FreeRepublic held a rally in DC in which about two dozen people showed up, about the same time the American Enterprise Institute held a rally to free some Russian Jew crook which about 100 showed up, forgotten indeed. All in all this gives us more material to shove in the face of our co-racialists who might dare question the status quo.
#3 by backbaygrouch4 on 03/24/2008 - 8:23 pm
While sympathetic to Dave’s position on the fact that those fighting in Iraq are volunteers, I feel constrained to note two caveats.
1.) The military prevents soldiers from leaving the service at the end of their contracts. This is coercive. It also dilutes the free will argument explaining signing up for a reenlistment bonus If you have to stay anyway why not take the money? Of course, it extends the ‘voluntary’ term of service.
Sara’s brat did a similar thing 1940. The gullible were induced into ‘volunteering’ with the promise that their service would be limited to a year and that would exempt them from overseas duty in the event of a war. Of course, that section oof the contract was changed to “for the duration” after FDR brought about America’s entry into the old world’s war. It is called “:rule of law,’ jew law.
2.) Most who signed up to the National Guard did so in the reasonable expectation that they would provide emergency services for their community and be ready to defend America. They did not anticipate being slaughtered to defend Israel’s imperialist ambitions. This sort of bait and switch is grounds to void a contract in normal circumstances. But jew law, which is what the three branches of government inflicts upon the populace, places no value on Christian white lives. The literal contract is enforced against all justice and equity.
The point being that the circumstance leading to deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan is not as cut and dried as it appears.
BTW, does any BUG know where, on the Internet, I can get a religious breakdown of the casualties of both World Wars and the Korean conflict by religion? Back before the Flood when I was a callow youth such was readily available. This information is no longer easy to get, as the jews convinced the government that it was antisemetic to publish it. Oddly, it is available for Vietnam because it was chiseled on the monument.
The government keeps such statistics. It would be nice to see who fights wars as opposed to who foments them. As I recall the jewish share of casualties was about 62% of their fair share. It seems that a substantial portion of the jews were able to avoid service in WWII. Probably did not think that the war with Mr. Hitler was good for the jews.
Anyway I should like to refresh my memory and verify my understanding. This is the sort of information that every intelligent citizen should have at his fingertips in order to arrive at informed opinions. But the present Washington elite thinks that darkness in better than light.
I would much appreciated directions in this matter and thank you for any assistance.
#4 by Z on 03/25/2008 - 6:24 am
“The military prevents soldiers from leaving the service at the end of their contracts.”
Not exactly true. Anyone who joins the military, joins for 8 years. So if someone does 4 years on active duty, they must finish the remainder of their time either in the reserves/NG or in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). While someone is in the IRR, they can be called up for more service. It says this in the contract. Many people think they join the military for 4 and their done. This is wrong, its always 8 years.
As far as the Iraq war goes, it is here where one can see no better example of people who sold their souls for wordism. When I see Ollie North interviewing some 25 year PL leader who talks about how “important” it is to bring “freedom” to the Arabs, I know I’m looking at an extreme wordist. Can you imagine that? Here’s a person WILLING TO DIE for a reason outside the survival of his family and race. I think Don Corleone said it best when he said “don’t die for anyone except your family.”
Only the white race is capable of such foolishness. How many whites would actually go on TV and say they were willing to die for the survival of the white race? Probably less than those willing to bring “freedom” to the Arabs? Perhaps I’m wrong? But whenever I hear these young soldiers make such a statement I can’t help thinking the following:
“If these people are this willing to die for the Arabs, how can we help them become willing to live for their race?”
Now I know there’s all sorts of things at play like socialization and the media which mold people into who they are, but it seems so clear to me? This is why if we (“we” meaning the forces that wish to preserve the white race)are to be anything, we need to be revolutionaries of the mind and spirit. We need to be more than just the people who urge whites to oppose affirmative action or forced busing. We need to change the whole weltanschauung of the white race. So when the next FDR or Lincoln stands up and starts even mentioning the idea of going to war to kill white people for ridiculous reasons, the people literally laugh him/her out of office (or maybe into jail).
I’m not sure this thinking ever existed before? Even before political correctness, we still seen whites willing to kill other whites for corrupt reasons. It was still ALL wordism.
NO, we’re here (At BUGS) not to change the kind wordism, we’re here to rid the white race of it and replace it with racialism (Just like every other race).
#5 by mderpelding on 03/26/2008 - 10:41 pm
Who sold George Wallace out?
The southern aristocracy.
And why?
Was it the concept of “throw the masses to the wolves?”