On Stormfront there is a thread about how bad it is for Stormfronters to support Obama. I kept asking why it was worse to support Obama than a white race traitor. This question was largely ignored. We are USED to race traitors. We SHOULD NOT BE.
We belong to a race that was known for dying loyally around the body of their chief. The race of the Alamo and the 300 Spartans, none of whom probably had the jet-black hair depicted in the movie on all of them. Yet now a traitor is considered the norm.
Pat Buchanan wrote a piece about the disappearance of the white race and asked “Does it Matter?” But he didn’t answer the question. He didn’t answer the question because he would have had to address the issue I just brought up.
If it were a question of CATHOLICS disappearing from the globe, Buchanan would naturally say, “Yes, it matters, because I am a Catholic.” If it had been the disappearance of blacks or Chinese a black or Chinese would naturally have said, “Yes, it matters because I am black (or Chinese).”
We all know no white man is allowed to say that and remain respectable, but since when did it apply to those of us who do not claim to be respectable? Yet we endorse this by saying that there is nothing special about a white traitor, but a black candidate is very, very important to us.
We think like respectables, and that has got to STOP!
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
#1 by Dave on 05/10/2008 - 8:22 pm
Political Correctness’s conditioning of a somnolent public leads to a labyrinth where no matter the intellectual turns there is a barrier in front and barrier behind that prevents the public from seeing.
The transmission of genetic traits is as powerful a natural force as the body’s ability to heal. This is a basic as it gets, yet the most essential matters leak out only in the distorted and trivialized passions of an election cycle.
Treason? What greater treason can there be as to not take care to carefully match mother and father to produce strong, healthy, attractive, and racially pure children? Treason cannot abolish genetics-in-descent, a natural force that is as great as the body’s power to heal.
Nor is the moral right and obligation to harness this natural force, being the greatest of all moral rights and obligations (for it is tethered directly to the greatest of all biological forces), be slighted, for such natural force needs TO BE REQUIRED to be harnessed as a matter of law and policy.
Now there’s a heresy for you. But when that heresy takes hold, a future will dawn and those investigating our era with its love marriages and sexual nonsense will be uncomprehending: How could there be such a religion? How could there be such blindness and denial of such elemental truth?
Yet this is the terrible fact of the matter.
But like Mark once alluded in our blog, “Those that own the present never have the slightest influence on what actually happens”.
Insights don’t get more intelligent than that.
#2 by AFKANNow on 05/10/2008 - 11:23 pm
The older I become, the more clearly I see how the willfully dysgenic policies of the Sixties – Immigration Act of 65 and the welfare policies – have been amplified by the Children of The Sixties and their narcissistic rage, and have been fueled by their worship of oppositional defiance.
I have seen – in my lifetime – how the SECOND generation of mixed race marriages have produced what resemble monsters – the worst characteristics of the Faithful Colored Mate are all too obvious when mixed with the superior genetics of the White Female – it’s almost always the Female, except in science fiction…
It might be that the Awakening has made this much more obvious; before, I pretty much ignored it, and now, it is obviously an Abomination.
I suspect the weakening of the traditional Family unit had more to do with this than we dare imagine.
In earlier times, it was unquestioned that the daughter had the duties to Bear Better Children; this was the social equivalent of eugenics.
The glorification of the state religion of Political Correctness, with its operation doctrine of “Equality – By Any Means Necessary” – has replaced the implicit Western Impulse for a better tomorrow, with its African counterpart.
This ties back to Burnham, and his great idea that the West began to commit suicide by halting expansion, and then, failing to defend the borders, and then, failing to defend the values that made “Western” and “Civilization” all but one word.
This trend continue internally, amplified by the Children of the Sixties and their blind hatred of all that made their standard of living possible.
It continues today, with TWO Children of the Sixties battling for the Democratic nomination, and control for the future of the Democratic Party. (After the illegals are legalized, the only party with be the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party will be reduced to a Southern rump party, on a par with the Whigs of 1860.)
So, we are battling the Zeitgeist of the Sixties, carried forward.
Battling this prairie fire will require the reformulation of the primacy of Families – the essential foundation of Race, in microcosm, and the bridge for Race, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture – and this will develop as a response to the Second Great Depression, which is well on its way.
Families will HAVE to come together, for economic survival, and then, will HAVE to develop a eugenic focus, particularly at the Cultural level.
At that point, we shall have their undivided attention…
We should have something they need to hear, offered in a helpful manner.
#3 by mderpelding on 05/11/2008 - 5:38 pm
Please remember that we the peoples’ votes are taken as “yea” votes. While you may vote against a candidate, the system interprets your vote as a positive.
Respectable conservatives are all up in arms over the traitor John McCain. So they want to vote for the absolute existential enemy Barack Obama.
The respectable Republican leadership will interpret these crossover votes as an excuse to reset their agenda more towards that of Barack Obama.
What’s really funny, is that our so-called enemies on the “left” feel the same way.
We are ruled by amoral sociopaths because the majority of the electorate votes for the lessor of two evils. Or they are trying to send a message.
Please understand this…
Your vote is interpreted as an AFFIRMATIVE.
#4 by Simmons on 05/12/2008 - 7:17 am
It’s cult behavior. Most of the overt dialog that takes place in the open political/social discourse is cult speak of esoteric nonsense meant to wow the rubes and pacify the true believers. Nearly every “American” who pays any attention to anything belongs to a cult. While energized minorities are the aggressive ones the bulk of White Americans belong to a passive cargo cult which speaking the language of the day is believed to deliver the goods and keep one in good standing.
With that said they could be called traitor by us and few would have any concept of what we are talking about, sorry that is the fact. we won’t get anywhere until we learn to unwind the cult training and that is nearly one by one at first till we have trained a cadre that moves in its own ocean and does our work for us. Each individual has to do this on his own by questioning the basic “truths” of his/her particular cult. Importantly we must give these people the basic questions they must ponder, shrieking at them only drives them deeper into the cult.
#5 by shari on 05/12/2008 - 10:50 am
One thing those who own the present, wouldn’t have expected, would be the success of the Dugger family. They will be the ones who will own the future of Arkansas. It won’t be the Clintons with their one, so we look like a family, daughter. AND it won’t be
Mexicans. Bet you’ll never see any of their daughters hanging on the arm of a negro either.