Simmons is keeping up a drumbeat of comments largely BASED ON ACTION.
He keeps referring to battles he is fighting in AR and Talkmag, but I can’t find the links.
Simmons, please repeat them.
Simmons challenged Mderpelding to USE an approach. This is no criticism of Drpelding. The point here is that Simmons is not just theorizing. He is reporting from the field.
I LOVE that!
We DO need to hammer out our world view here, so theory is ESSENTIAL. Simmons does his share of that, too, and I expect our people to READ THE COMMENTS.
But we always have to keep in mind the attitude that separates Aryans from Chinese Philosophers:
One experiment is worth a hundred Authorities.
TRY IT OUR on people you talk to and anywhere you can get past the censors who are living proof of their fear of us.
And REPORT BACK TO US what WORKS and, just as important, WHAT DOESN’T WORK.
#1 by Simmons on 07/10/2008 - 11:15 am
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2008/07/paul_gottfried.php#comments
Nothing spectacular and as you see the other posters go back trying to sound like mommy prof.
#2 by Dave on 07/10/2008 - 11:59 am
I think that Simmons is very helpful. That’s because he focuses, simply, on the fact that nonwhites are USERS of white power while in no way being the SOURCE of benefits they take for granted.
When a nonwhite flips a switch to acquire the benefits of electricity, presses on an automobile accelerator to get from A to B, climbs aboard an aircraft, stores information on a computer, uses a mobile phone to communicate, swipes a plastic card at the checkout to obtain food, takes medicine to control his blood pressure, and does a myriad of other things, that nonwhite is a USER of white power.
But the intolerable conceit of Political Correctness is that nonwhites are a SOURCE of this type of power, or potentially may become one.
This is the granddaddy lie of Political Correctness. This lie is an offense against white people and an attack upon us.
It is this lie that must be confronted directly. This is what Simmons is doing.
At BUGS we deal with this issue all the time, but we are throwing way too many words at it.
Just like the Mantra confronts the conceit of nonwhite immigration into white counties in a very effective and condensed way, we need another Mantra to expose the lie that clothes the USERS of white beneficence with the merit that rightfully belongs to the SOURCE of white beneficence, which are the minds and creativity of white people themselves.
BW has spoken many times on how long it took him to draft the Mantra. I fully understand that struggle. To capture something very essential and to communicate it effectively isn’t easy.
I’m going over potential versions of another Mantra that exposes the Politically Correct lying that says nonwhites are a SOURCE of creativity and accomplishment in the way we whites are. But I know I am a long way from coming up with it.
Simmons is very helpful in this regard for he is confronting the issue directly.
#3 by Simmons on 07/10/2008 - 3:39 pm
My comments at AR addressed the Mantra fairly directly of its original intent about white national integrity.
Specifically of Dave’s take is he must responding to my rejoiner to Pelding on his post about English. Yes just ask them why they want to integrate with whites or speak his language or dress like him or occupy his countries. Just ask these questions its devastating to this conceit.