B. U. G. S.

in reply to Bob:

Good points, and I’d like to address some of them at length.

you wrote:

Dave’s discussion of the tool we need causes me once more to an oft-repeated theme I keep pushing:

The power of the future will be with those who become spokesmen FOR the white race. And by this I mean Mantra spokesmen. On the respectable right, the spokesman for the white race is a black man married to white woman who keeps being lauded by National Review for sponsoring Civil Rights Initiatives which outlaw affirmative action.

in reply:
This is the larger issue we have failed to address Creatively.

We keep “coloring inside the lines” that Others have chosen for us, and those lines always seem to force us to define ourselves to the satisfaction of Others.

Always, we seem to make the mistake of being reasonable with the unreasonable, and rational with the irrational – who have no such compunctions, as they are fully aware of how they are manipulating us.

As for our Racial “spokesmen,…”

you wrote:

In the Movement there are many professional spokesmen who are AGAINST Jews or illegal aliens.

Both the respectable conservatives and the professional spokesmen in the Movement just keep losing. But they consider themselves legitimate spokesmen for whites against what they perceive as the attack on whites. They cannot takeover white intellectual leadership because of their limitations, and their limitations go back to the basic point: “Why do people SAY things?”

in reply:
I think our “Racial spokesmen” keep losing because they allow the Enemy to frame the terms of the debate, and reduce us to battle on “their” terms, with us always trying to be oh so reasonable, with people who are actively plotting our personal irrelevance, and our Racial demise.

Damndest thing I have ever seen, and I look at the de facto gelding our our Posterity – our Young Men, in particular – with horror.

The Republicans just lost another one, because they refused to use Race in a positive manner. Indeed, their moments of greatest political effectiveness was following a choice the Leadership later regretted – the Governor from Whitelandia, who spoke as openly and forthrightly as one could, under the circumstances.

Her example called forth a positive Racial response, as millions of White Americans saw what was not only possible, but, at one time, was remarkably routine, and remarkably effective, for the Republicans.

(Parenthetically, I think the look of McCain at his concession speech was that of the whipped dog who was glad to be back in the kennel, eating “Double Plus Good” dog food, instead of running with the wolves – like the Governor from Whitelandia.)

you wrote:

As BUGS people WHO ARE DOING THEIR JOB know from EXPERIENCE, the Mantra is a whole ‘nother animal. It separates us form respectable conservatives because we are talking about racial survival, not just safe attacks on targets that retain one’s respectability.

in reply:
Note how effectively the “respectable” CONservatives have been penned in intellectually, discussing the safe symbols that have been all but controlled by their Racial Enemies, notably the Constitution.

GOD, how angry I get when I hear these idiots on CONservative radio talk with blind love and total worship of “the Constitution.” They all act as if we could magically restore the pre-14th Amendment Constitution to power, America would suddenly be what it was made out to be in the post-WWII advertising, complete with lunar bases and a Mars Colony – with a Studebaker dealership!

you wrote:

The Mantra uses another theme I keep hammering at: Saying something so obvious that no one notices it.

Movement professionals face the same problem Kennedy Assassination hype deals with. It is simply impossible for the average person to accept that a single Communist ex-military sharpshooter changed history. To LITERALLY sell it, you need for the story of the Big Event to be as massive as the event.

There was money in the conspiracy movie JFK. No one has ever even THOUGHT of making a movie about Lee Harvey Oswald’s life.

So no Movement Leaders is going to settle for hitting the obvious fact that we are facing genocide. They have to have a complete Evil Scenario, a “JFK” of their own.

in reply:
I see this in a somewhat different light.

I think they do this to (1) feel Important, like one of the “Insiders” Catrto’s people always whisper about, and (2) they do THAT to mask their relative ineffectiveness – Hell, impotence – in the world around them.

One day I just had it with a guy I worked with who kept talking about “Insiders,” and “The International Banking Conspiracy,” and I used words that all but crushed him:

“SO WHAT? WHAT are you going to DO about it, and, for that matter, what CAN you DO about it?”

In retrospect, I shouldn’t have been quite so forthright, as his brilliant, shiny little toy was revealed to be nothing more than a worthless bauble, and it was all he had…

That defines much of Movement Present, for all practical purposes; listening to shortwave radio for calls to Power that always seem to never quite appear. “Where’s Dr. Pierce tonight?”

Gone, and if he was here, he would be asking you to do Something – Hell, ANYTHING – Constructive, for your Race.

you wrote:

They have to sell BOOKS.

in reply:
Yes, they must maintain the facade of respectability, for, without it, they would be like the late Dr. Sam Francis, virtually alone, and mocked, because he came too damn close to telling part of the Truth about Race, and the Race War AGAINST us that is more active than ever.

On the contrary, we at BUGS spend a lot of time trying to boil the short Mantra down even more. This sets us entirely aside from respectables who make their livings by never criticizing that fundamental tenet of our established religion, interracial marriage, and from professionals in the Movements who must sell BOOKS.

in reply:
True, but those are the Rules of the Game that were given to them when they were coming up, and it was part and parcel of the price they had to pay to be in The System at all.

you wrote:

I am not criticizing our professionals. They did what they had to do to fight for our race. I made my living and my retirement by being a conservative pimp. Now that I am financially secure, I am doing what needs to be done THROUGH YOU. But a lifelong professional conservative pimp in no position to preach at David Duke or Jared Taylor on MORAL grounds. This is strictly strategy. It is a strategy I can NOW follow.

in reply:
Do you think so many people criticize Duke and Taylor for the flaws revealed as their failures in trying, while ignoring the fact that the critics, with one or two exceptions, do – literally – NOTHING at all for our Race?

you wrote:

Once again, EVERYTHING HERE INTERRELATES. This goes back to one of the many short, OBVIOUS points I keep hammering you with, in this case do people SAY things?”

We have a special tool no official leader can afford. We don’t NEED to sell an exciting book and we don’t need respectability to make a living.

in reply:
Once you have abandoned the past jewel of middle-class respectability, you can get amazing things done.

But FIRST, you have to work on yourself, and accept a positive theory of Race.

My Tool is this:

Once we get away from the emotional and intellectual safety of abstractions, and define issues in terms of Family – INSTEAD of exclusively using the term “Race” – we really move forward quickly.

Just look at the Governor from Whitelandia, Sarah Palin.

What has she said, so far, that is different from what Dr. Duke, or Dr. Francis, would have said, in the same circumstances, to the same audience?

SHE FILLED ALL OF HER VENUES WITH CHEERING SUPPORTERS, and so, in time, can we.