King Tut’s DNA is Western European – EU Times.net
At the King Tut exhibit in Dallas, a black county commissioner, John Wiley Price, was exclaiming defensively that Tut and the Egyptian Pharaohs were Negroid.
A local talk show host decided on a lark to call the Egyptian embassy and get to the bottom of the controversy.
By a gift of fate, he got the Egyptian Ambassador on the line. He spoke English and had a PhD in Ancient Egyptian Studies. The ambassador said the Pharaohs were European.
When pushed further he admitted, “Let me put it this way: The Ancient Egyptians were blond haired, blue eyed white people.”
The subject never came up again.
So much for the Afro-centrists and others who have derided the obvious northwestern European appearance of a large number of the pharaohonic mummies. It seems like March of the Titans was right after all.
And the Buddhists tell us that Gautama Buddha had eyes the blue of blue lotus.
And documentaries show Egyptians as having about the same amount of white blood as the average American black, especially the Pharaohs.
How is this information produced?
And “I Claudius” on “Educational” TV has drab statues of the type we call “classical” in Emperor Claudius’ garden.
My brother used to wipe the blackboard for his professors when he was in college, so he could talk with them. He stuck to their subject, math or history or whatever. That was about 1950. At that time each professor thought his own subject was the most fascinating thing in the world.
By the late 1960s when I was going to professorial conferences the people there looked like any other group of people on the make. It could have been a gathering of book salesmen or contractors.
It reminds me of one thing CS Lewis said abut his English school days, when all the boys had to participate in sports: “It was not fun for anyone, least of all me.”
Many a professional football player loves it when he gets a day off from “playing.”
In 1950 a history professor had something relatively few people at that time had, a college degree, not to mention his doctorate. History books back then were very commonly best sellers. They had CHOSEN history as their field.
Today a person who chooses any social science will have to teach it to make a living from his degree. As with CS Lewis at school or a professional baseball player, there is such extreme competition for a job that any fun it might have held is gone.
Does anybody remember the term “eccentric professors?”
They’re gone. Those who make their living in history are in a constant life-or-death struggle to know exactly what journals want. They have to keep their minds on what each editor wants, and he in turn keeps his mind on what the “state of the literature” is.
You don’t get an idea and publish. You find out what you should try to publish now, much like any other salesman keeps up with his market.
History was once a group of individualistic professors known to be eccentric because they had abandoned all better-paying pursuits for their obsession. It is now a rigid, grim bureaucracy. No one who wants to be a tenured professor DARES to be individualistic.
This feeds on itself. As the history bureaucrats take over, they begin to resent anyone who is obviously a good writer and doesn’t do the “work” they do to get ahead. Like grim people everywhere, they resent happier ones.
They get to HATE someone who is having a good time at the subject.
#1 by Dick_Whitman on 08/06/2010 - 11:35 am
One of the most important concepts I learned from BUGS is:
“Why was this information produced?”
Once one understands this concept, they never look at the world the same again.
Like Bob, I watch the mainstream media (news and entertainment) so I can understand what the masses think about.
I like to concentrate on commercials. Many of these commercials feature anti-white “active measures.” The skits, memes, characters, and images help propagate the multicult narrative and mythology.
There are people who work all day to produce this kind of information. In fact, they’re rewarded for it.
Of course, this also means that there’s a paper trail.
#2 by SFGrimoir on 08/06/2010 - 11:38 am
Here`s one bureaucracy-lover getting his arse handed back to him:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/paul_krugman_gives_up_1.html
“A marvelous thing happened over on Paul Krugman’s blog at the New York Times last week. Krugman effectively conceded defeat on a range of economic debates. Who defeated him? People who posted comments on his New York Times blog. Mere commenters.”
“For those who do not know, Paul Krugman is one of the few who still claim that Keynesian progressivism is the answer to America’s (and Europe’s) problems, not their cause. He repeats that claim many times each month. Amid these repeated expressions of his “progressive” faith, he now also repeatedly expresses grim despair because his progressive policy prescriptions are being accepted less and less in the public square, even by the Obama administration.”
“James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal, after listing the falsities in Krugman’s latest piece on climate last week, hazarded that perhaps “Krugman makes himself ridiculous merely to make our job easy.””
“Secure in his big-government ideology, he admitted that he had never read that literature. But like the ideologue that he is, Krugman then expressed his faith (the only word appropriate) that “bureaucracy will do a heckuva job” if it is not “downgraded and devalued.” Bloggers responded by citing the latest economic science showing the impossibility of Krugman’s “utopian dictatorship-by-bureaucracy.””
#3 by Simmons on 08/06/2010 - 12:56 pm
“Economics” to our ruling class is about the care and feeding of non-whites with squabbles about who is going to make a living or profit from said venture. It is the language of Empire.
Obama’s jews seem to be dropping away, of course jews being perhaps the most sensitive to having their dogmas questioned. This means the next round of advice for Obama will sound like a Nixon/Hubert Humphrey discussion such as “You gonna nigger it up next month.”
Back to Bob’s point, this means talent, real talent is on the revolutionary side of the line. You can see that thruout our little world where we are starting to pick up people who just a decade ago were conventional lumpen professionals slaving away for the 401k.
#4 by Dick_Whitman on 08/06/2010 - 1:06 pm
SFGrimoir,
The anti-whites may give us “free markets” in the future? They may even support Von Mises youth groups and force every college freshman to read Murry Rothbard, but this is not of our concern.
We ask the Iron Question:
Are you-pro White, or are you pro-White genocide?
#5 by SFGrimoir on 08/07/2010 - 5:37 pm
I was merely pointing out that the sheeple`s faith in the anti-White big-government/mommy professorship control grid is showing obvious signs of crumbling.
I have certainly not forgotten about the importance of the Iron Question,comrade.
#6 by Dick_Whitman on 08/07/2010 - 6:37 pm
OK, just making sure you’re squared away…carry on 🙂
#7 by Alan B on 08/08/2010 - 1:24 pm
Today, the inhabitants of Egypt are dark skinned, the average smuck would assume it was always this way. The PC establishment can sell this lie based on this assumption. Real physical evidence speaks for itself. I noticed the other day on the history channel how many of the ancient Egyptian carvings of their kings were missing their nose.