In Part I I explained why the ex-slaves interviewed in the 1930s WPA program had almost nothing bad to say about slavery.
My point has nothing to do with slavery. My point is that a side which controls communication grows ever more unrealistic.
That is why they cannot handle this WPA project. So they ignore it. As time passes the things one militantly ignores get to be a bigger and bigger stack insulating you from reality.
Reality, by its nature, has a lot of staying power.
I explained that this strange complimentary image of slavery in the only interviews with actual slaves, not by using it as an anti-slavery screed or as a neo-Confederate, but by simply addressing the reality. Why did these ex-slaves themselves produce this information?
First, because when they were interviewed they were old and ill.
My second point here is that this survey was conducted during the DEPRESSION.
There is a lot of truth in the joke the black comedian George Wallace made:
“Oh, yea, I know about slavery,
that was the last time all the black folks had JOBS.”
Anti-whites are so dedicated to the evils of the white world that they get utterly deaf to any inconvenient reality. I was explaining to a new Political Science PhD that one complaint against the apartheid regime in South Africa was that the government did not protect black labor against black immigration.
She had never heard that, but understood. Then she defended her Orthodoxy by replying, “Yes, but all those blacks only wanted to go to South Africa to work for food.”
My reply, which caused a roomful of laughs, was to say, naively, “You know, when you’re starving, food is pretty important.” The rest of the room was laughing, but to her this was the kind of statement they report to the European Thought Police.
In the desperate 1930s, an old black man might not see his condition as better then it would have been under slavery. You could fire an old black man in the 1930s when it was hopeless for him to find any job. At that time, even for favored groups, a JOB, a LIVING, had a priority none of Mom Professor Acolytes, as I show above, can even imagine.
Black immigration under apartheid was almost entirely FROM the New Independent African Republics and INTO South Africa because of a priority no anti-white can actually SEE.
An old, old black man in the late 1930s had been YOUNG when he was a slave and, the ultimate priority in the 1930s, he was SAFE.
Notice that I am not defending slavery. I am explaining realities that anti-whites cannot deal with because their only strategy is militant denial.
Year by year, because of this denial, any simple mention of basic truth, like the Mantra, hits them in areas in which they have never learned to cope
#1 by Epiphany on 01/14/2012 - 6:08 am
The whole time, Blacks and Jews are debating whether Slavery was worse than the Holocaust, or vice versa. None perceive the idiocy of that, except me!
#2 by backbaygrouch on 01/14/2012 - 6:09 am
During WWII the New York Times sent reporters around the nation to drum up stories about the broad support for the global conflagration and for FDR who had drawn America into it. In Birmingham a late middle aged Negro was approached. He had a rough time in the 30s but was now working in a steel mill with all the overtime he could ask for. He knew his bread was being buttered. Pressed for a statement of appreciation for the author of his present good fortune he accommodated the scribe with, “Every night, suh, on my knees I thank God for bringing Mr. Hitler into my life.”
Makes sense. The official line was, and still is, that der Fuhrer was solely responsible for the war.
#3 by Epiphany on 01/14/2012 - 6:14 am
That is so ironic, it is actually funny. To think, we are all supposed to perceive Hitler as the ultimate evil. Robert Whitaker is correct: the Political Left have made a Deity out of him.
#4 by Dave on 01/14/2012 - 9:25 am
If a person has a determination, a real determination, it defines who the person is. They can’t give up their determination without giving up who they are.
Nonwhites have an iron will not to starve and an almost as great a determination to prosper.
And that accounts for their desperate struggle to live among and work for whites. For nonwhites, there are too few white people. The determination of nonwhites to live among white people and to be like white people, despite the scarcity of white people, defines who nonwhites are.
This reality is enormously inconvenient for anti-whites.
#5 by Peter Whiterabbit on 01/14/2012 - 4:12 pm
Some pro-Whites fall into the same trap of not being able to handle simple truths. If it doesn’t involve a vast jewish conspiracy, they don’t want to hear about it.