I tend to ignore people with new proposals for BUGS for one overwhelming reason:
They’re talking theory.
The Mantra developed over decades while I was famous for beating the anti-whites in the open.
As one commenter pointed out years ago, I practically cleaned out the Opposing Views section of Stormfront all by myself.
BUT NO ONE FOLLOWED MY LEAD.
In a society where everybody preached “by their WORKS you shall know them” no one even THOUGHT about someone whose only product was RESULTS.
So I am not greatly interested in someone explaining that the Mantra is too long or other problems I have been frustrated by for decades.
One commenter even came with the gloriously original idea of calling the other Communists!
It was a well-meant discussion, but I have seen thousands of these on Stormfront.
The Mantra is too long.
Tell ME about it.
This problem is being addressed daily, but not by theorists.
We are FINDING, by EXPERIENCE, that key phrases like “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” slam home in certain places and in certain ways.
I only put in “ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY” years after I realized that we needed to fix attention on the abrupt new issue at the outset.
Properly placed, many parts of the Mantra bring out the whole point.
PROPERLY PLACED.
But only one who is out in the field can do this.
#1 by Gavin on 01/18/2012 - 12:11 pm
Yesterday on a popular board someone claiming to work for the SPLC started a thread. I believe it was legitimate because the professional anti-Whites usually have a particular tone and demeanor.
I started asked why the overwhelming majority of the people and groups they attack are White, with a token non-White thrown in for plausible deniability reasons. SPLC replied that what I had said was incorrect and ridiculous. To expose that blatant lie I posted a picture from their website that showed the faces of the people they attack and asked him to identify what race the people in the picture were. The response I got was that they were based in the USA and most of the people in the USA are White so therefore most of the people they attack will be White and it would be different if they were in Japan.
I responded:
But you are not in Japan.
Your type of groups only exist in White countries and you only attack White people.
You say you are “anti-racist.” What you are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
All of a sudden SPLC started to lose confidence and started whining that I was not playing his game.
Then suddenly the thread was deleted. (The original poster has the ability to do that)
The right use of the right line at the right time, makes all the difference.
#2 by OldBlighty on 01/18/2012 - 3:39 pm
Bob,
What the heck is going on here?
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t860070-5/
Originally Posted by Sigrid View Post
Where do you fight White genocide? Online? Is that where White people die or are dying? Come on, be real. As much as I am pro-mantra, one must step outside of the box, step outside of copying and pasting the mantra online, and use it in the real world. Have you ever spoken to a senator or congressman and spoken the mantra to him or her? I would love to hear a story from anyone who has done that.
#3 by Gavin on 01/18/2012 - 3:57 pm
So online is not the “real world” and getting our message using the medium of the internet is not imporant?
If only the anti-Whites had such an opinion about television and film at the time when they took over those media.
#4 by OldBlighty on 01/18/2012 - 4:07 pm
The point that got me, is she is denying White GeNOcide.
Pro White leaders need to do their homework, before they start throwing their weight around in our sections.
Unless Bob says otherwise, if a Pro White says anti-White things, I’ll treat them exactly the same way I treat a garden variety, anti-White.
I am not posting the Mantra to become popular, or to become a grovelling respectable politician. I am doing it to stop White GeNOcide.
#5 by Gavin on 01/18/2012 - 4:22 pm
Correct. She is implying that only violation section A of the genocide convention is punishable under international law and sections B-E, were just added for decoration.
Genocide is the elimination of a race, not simply of individuals.
#6 by Genseric on 01/18/2012 - 6:56 pm
I noticed this as well, gents. It is getting rather tiresome.
I feel like the tiniest of ALL minorities. I understand, thanks to Bob, what is destroying our people and I actually DO something about it.
1)Acknowledge and identify the problem (apparently this is a HUGE burden for some White Nationalists)
2)Design a action plan (thanks again Bob)
3)Work your plan and plan your work
Edit: I think some people are still stuck on this “FLYERING” thing that they grew up on; was a major staple of their WN diet. You know, that Real World Activism we keep hearing about… How very 80’s of them.
Pfffft………..
#7 by OldBlighty on 01/18/2012 - 7:54 pm
Correction. I misread her post.
She wasn’t saying White GeNOcide is rubbish, she was saying the BUGSers method, is a waste of time.
#8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 01/18/2012 - 9:32 pm
“Pro White leaders”
Btw, the Sigrid who posts on whitenewsnow.com has a different username on SF. This Sigrid I’m rather certain is a different person.
#9 by cavefish on 01/18/2012 - 3:43 pm
I wonder what they would say if you asked them if they have a branch in Japan trying to genocide the Japanese as well.
#10 by Genseric on 01/18/2012 - 7:13 pm
Theoretician [thee-er-i-tish-uhn] noun (1): A genetic hybrid resulting from parent sex cells of a politician and a sloth. Their calling card is an exchange that leaves the audience wondering “Okay… I get that we are BIG on theory around here. So, what’s the solution? What’s the plan?”
Theoretician [thee-er-i-tish-uhn] noun (2): a person who deals with or is expert in the theoretical side of a subject: a political theoretician.
Antonyms: practical politician, doer, performer, agent, executor, BUGSter
#11 by Genseric on 01/18/2012 - 8:02 pm
“Where’s the ACTION?!”
#12 by OldBlighty on 01/18/2012 - 7:39 pm
moved up
#13 by Coniglio Bianco on 01/18/2012 - 7:53 pm
I have also been seeing and hearing people saying that it isn’t really genocide. That it is ‘attempted’ genocide because we haven’t been wiped out yet and there are plenty of us left. No, it’s already full-blown genocide at this very moment.
The convention states that genocide includes ‘acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part’. If even one single White person has been affected as part of the group that is being targeted then it’s genocide. All that matters is the intent to destroy not the number of people affected or the proportion of the group that has been destroyed.
#14 by H.Avenger on 01/18/2012 - 8:41 pm
C. Bianco,
YES. We are calling this White Rabbit GeNOcide because that is precisely how the law defines what is happening to whites the world over.
#15 by H.Avenger on 01/18/2012 - 8:38 pm
I was not allowed to post on the suicide thread. So I’ll post it here since I was asked about this on Stormfront. (the suicide thread is closed)
Question in my inbox: “Horus what would it take to agree with the suicide folks”
I might even agree with them….IF white people ever got a chance to vote on their death…remember they have never been allowed a vote..I might agree with them if 90% of whites didn’t look to move into all white areas….and I might agree with them IF they showed any understanding at all in regards to psychological warfare.
There are White Rabbits that willingly commit suicide. But they are not the majority and they most certainly would not have been able to get any vote passed for a non white immigration.
In my mind, debating the suicide nonsense, shows a lack of understanding over what we are doing and just HOW the law actually defines Genocide. Many times on these forums rabbits are talking past each other.
But I will give you guys a clue. And I am on record for two years ++ now. It will not ever be known publicly as suicide…..it will be known as White GeNOcide. And when it comes out what our enemy has actually said on the record. And what they have and had planned for us…..it will be labeled Genocide. There will not be any debate.
Sigrid,
Some rabbits choose online activism. That is where a lot of action happens these days. Some choose using a consistent message like the Mantra in their day to day life. I don’t make anyone choose. Internet activism is real world activism. There are many memes that are now coming into the public’s consciousnesses just because of Internet Activism. IF it weren’t for the internet we would be hearing very little about the “federal reserve being a private corp.”. Heck, even other candidates have to move toward Ron Paul’s position on questioning this one…..simply because of internet activism. You can sit and talk to senate and congress all day long about the Federal Reserve. Ron Paul did just that for eons and it went NO where. But the internet spread the meme in no time flat.
__________________
#16 by Soldier_Ant on 01/19/2012 - 10:01 am
Well stated Horus. There seems to be a lot of resentment over BUGS in some pro-White circles, most of which I think is just sour grapes because it indirectly calls into question the effectiveness of the past pro-White “movement” methods. It’s hard for some people to let go of the old flyer mentality and accept that the internet is the biggest medium of interaction now. The internet has surpassed actual physical contact in importance in a great deal of human interactions. Hiding from that fact won’t change it as scary as that may be to some.
It boggles my mind to see complaints about online pro-White activities from someone who is obviously sitting behind a computer screen. It’s almost cognitive dissonance on display. I’m just nice, so I don’t like to hammer fellow pro-Whites by pointing it out to them when I see it occurring on places like Stormfront.
#17 by Simmons on 01/19/2012 - 12:04 pm
Since I don’t go to SF I’m not sure what this “suicide” thing is about, but coincidently over at takimag today Derbyshire brought up the meme of national suicide and RRS responds down the comment thread it is genocide.
http://takimag.com/article/the_right_not_to_commit_suicide/print#disqus_thread
#18 by Bob on 01/19/2012 - 6:49 pm
Congilio, you may want to ask them that, since on the official count, he got only a third of the Jews, it is fair to accuse Hitler of genocide?
#19 by Harumphty Dumpty on 01/19/2012 - 8:18 pm
@ Coniglio: “I have also been seeing and hearing people saying that it isn’t really genocide”
Sounds like progress to me. Until recently they weren’t talking about genocide at all.