Bob was asked recently to ok a radio ad which endorsed Donald Trump.
Bob has stated on numerous occasions that it is likely Donald Trump will do exactly what every Republican has always done, sell out. 
So instead of running radio ads that endorse Donald Trump, Bob has decided to run ads and a campaign that is there to keep Trump HONEST.
Bob’s Radio Ad:
“I am Bob Whitaker. Presidential Canidate for the American Freedom Party.
If Donald Trump sticks to his guns, I would drop out and support him. But I have watched for fifty years while Republicans sewed up the nomination by talking the talk and then, regular as clockwork, sold out to the Republican establishment.
My name on the ballot will cost Trump nothing if he sticks to his guns, but it might help to keep honest.”
Should Trump do what every republican has always done, Bob will be right there with the campaign platform that White Americans are expressing that they want!
#1 by Laura on 12/26/2015 - 2:27 pm
Bob and I will be joining paltalk this evening from 5pmET for a chat.
#2 by Secret Squirrel on 12/27/2015 - 1:58 am
Thanks Bob. If it wasn’t for you, 100% of Pro Whites would be cucking out. Now we are only 99% cuck.
#3 by Yankee Rebel on 12/27/2015 - 10:34 am
I am expecting Trump to sell out. He would be the exception to the rule if he didn’t. I will continue to support Bob to send a message that some of us Whites are sick of being sold out and genocided by the anti-White establishment.
#4 by Henry Davenport on 12/27/2015 - 6:54 pm
Trump is a real-life trending hashtag, like the ones we often attach to our tweets even when our tweets have no connection to the hashtag, just to get the hashtag’s audience.
(Attaching Trump to our message has gotten us repetition of a meme or two by The Telegraph in England, when it mentioned one of our White House meme-messages that worked off of Trump, and when Salon.com printed another such of our messages in its entirety.)
And unlike a lot of the trending hashtags we append to our tweets, Trump does have a connection to our message, which makes it easier to use him to spread our memes.
The second of these two projects can grow if we just stick Trump in some of our tweets in the suggested way (easy!):
The White House broadcasts Donald Trump’s opposition to White Genocide every month
Thank you Donald Trump for opposing White Genocide! – #1
There will be a new version of that second article every week (to repeat its title over and over), with new tweets, and successive numbers at the end of the title.
Our goal with both of those kind of projects is of course to associate Trump with White GeNOcide in the minds of blogsters and other media who look for things to write about Trump.
#5 by Henry Davenport on 12/27/2015 - 6:57 pm
Those two projects are small potatoes compared to something we could do:
Here’s what needs to be done (but without help from some of the talent here, it’s not going to be ready to launch until late summer at the very earliest):
A long list of email addresses and twitter handles of student organizations, local blogs, news outlets for the colleges in the Ivy League needs to be compiled, then a particularly notable anti-White Ivy League professor needs to be selected (let’s select a White one), the prof. needs to be inducted into “White Genocide’s ‘Hall of Infamy'” on WGP, a White House meme-message needs to be written about that induction that also involves Trump, and then emails need to be sent to all those addresses, full of Mantra and announcing the induction, and requesting that all recipients sign the petition and help the Donald fight White Genocide.
(Media is interested in everything that happens in the Ivy League…some months ago someone sent me a front-page article on Drudge about Yale students, i think it was, deciding to not allow plastic water bottles, i think it was. Imagine Drudge reporting that if the students were at Univ. of Oklahoma!)
Using an Ivy League professor taps into the Ivy League student bodies and all their organs to get involved in the fracas.
Folks, I am very low energy and just barely functional, to be honest, so if that gem of a project (IMO) gets launched before August, 2016, it will be because it’s as attractive to some of you as it is to myself and you have time to work on it. Get in touch, any of you who might be interested. A few blog and organizational email and twitter addresses collected each week will add up. We could organize the material either on threads here or in a private group on SF.
I forgot to mention, I hope to get Bob into the material sent out in that project, just as we’re getting him and Trump both into the single monthly WH petition we’re doing lately.
#6 by Jason on 12/27/2015 - 7:06 pm
Great points, I will use the #Trump hashtags more.
#7 by Henry Davenport on 12/27/2015 - 7:21 pm
#ThankYouDonaldTrump is a pre-existing hashtag that seems perfect for that project, but other Trump hashtags too, definitely!
When you and other folks here tweet your thanks to Trump, please link some of those tweets either to the WGP article I just linked, or to the BUGS thread on it here,
Thank Donald Trump for opposing White Genocide
so we’ll have some tweets to add to the next week’s article at WGP.
A probably really good idea is to include in some of the tweets the twitter addresses of blogs, e.g. “.@Salon.com” was in one of the tweets in this first week’s WGP article.
For added firepower, you can also include a link to the Bob/Trump petition of that month. January’s is the first one listed at the first link in my comment above.
#8 by Jason on 12/27/2015 - 8:29 pm
Will do. Great article to link.
#9 by Henry Davenport on 12/27/2015 - 7:49 pm
Like most things Bob has done in the last couple of years, I need time to absorb the radio message before I have any comment on it. Bob always goes to some new place to which my brain can’t go immediately.
But the graphic…the graphic is immediately great! LMAO! 🙂
#10 by Jason on 12/29/2015 - 3:08 am
Your strategy already paying off! Buzzfeed called out several “rayyycccisss” for connecting White Genocide to Trump:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mitch12345/white-genocide-13-racist-twitter-users-who-supp-1mvcp
Includes several BUGSERS. 🙂
#11 by Henry Davenport on 12/29/2015 - 3:39 am
Wow! How did this suddenly get so easy! (The answer of course is the opportunity to use the media’s interest in painting Trump as a racist).
Way to go, guys!!
Lol…there’s more BUGSers in that buzzfeed piece than there usually are at BUGS!
Fellow BUGSers, let’s keep the momentum rolling…check out this comment on our “Thank Donald Trump…” thread, and let’s include one of the two links suggested in some of our tweets!
#12 by Jason on 12/29/2015 - 3:53 am
there’s more BUGSers in that buzzfeed piece than there usually are at BUGS!
So it turns out a lot BUGSERS are busy in the field these days.
#13 by Henry Davenport on 12/29/2015 - 5:24 am
How did you come across that buzzfeed article? If I just go to buzzfeed and look for it, I can’t find it. I’m wondering if it’s getting any readers.
#14 by Benjamin Newells on 12/29/2015 - 10:19 am
Henry, it was actually a buzzfeed community article, written by a user. It’s not a real buzzfeed article.
#15 by Henry Davenport on 12/29/2015 - 12:15 pm
Does anyone know what group of people get to read it? Just other “users”? Some users apparently submit their pieces and buzzfeed then decides whether to run them or not, and other users apparently have a status that their articles go up automatically (?).
But presumably some small group of people get to read the piece in question in its present status (if you google the title, you get a hit), but general visitors to buzzfeed do not.
It wasn’t very well written, I didn’t think.
When I went to the only part of “buzzfeed community” I could go to, I didn’t see the article. Let’s see how Jason found it.
#16 by Jason on 12/29/2015 - 2:23 pm
Sorry I thought it was a real article. It has sense been removed from the community.
It was sent to me in this tweet: https://twitter.com/MitchBlatt/status/681708891827077121
I assume the guy who wrote it tweeted it to some of us.
#17 by Henry Davenport on 12/29/2015 - 9:24 pm
He was evidently hoping the editors would select it for inclusion.
#18 by richard on 01/05/2016 - 1:10 pm
Check out this tweet from a pro-white writer, and all the people’s replies. None of them will ever know where the word came from. Like Bob says, if you want to change the world, you have to let other people the take credit for it…
https://twitter.com/Ricky_Vaughn99/status/684210640983093252