Jason made me proud in his comments on my “Science Fiction Goes Senile.”

Who but a veteran BUGSER would look past all the comments he could make about the state of science fiction, and the whole subject of the Decline of Literature and hone in on the one deadly line that shows what standard and packaged jackasses anti-whites are.

Jason knows this because he has been in at the kill.

AMPWs are terribly upset because we don’t let them be intellectual.

You can’t beat pseudointellectuals by pseudointellectualism.

I have never heard a single clergymen ever quote Jesus’s words, “It is enough to call a fish a fish.”

Put yourself in the enemy’s shoes. One more long and respectful article does them no harm.

But a one sentence stating just how stupid they are is, as Jason says, devastating.

In Bob’s interview with CNN there were some revealing aspects.

The interviewer / #AntiWhite Conspiracy Theorist was desperately trying to make a connection between Bob and a killing that had happened in South Carolina. Bob flipped the tables repeatedly and brought it back to simple reality, showing up the #AntiWhite Conspiracy Theorist (#AWCT) as dubious and silly.

#AWCT: “If this kid, right, believes the same things you believe, that White America is under attack, and he pro-actively decided to go out and do something about that.”

Bob: “That’s the way you think?”

#AWCT: “I’m asking you.”

Bob: “You go shoot up” […/interrupted] #AWCT: “Of course not; I don’t.”

Bob: “I don’t either; well then why are you asking me?”

#AWCT: “I’m asking you if you think that” […/interrupted] Bob: “I don’t think walking into a church and shooting people is a good idea. I don’t think it’s that complicated. Is that really a complicated concept for you?”

The anti-White conspiracy theorist tried his best but he couldn’t handle Ol’ Bob.

…And of course Bob repeated our over-arching message:
“As I have said, immigration is only pushed on White countries. Everybody knows that. Not on Japan. Not on Taiwan. And the answer I usually get is ‘DUH’. But the fact is, we all know that.

“When you’re talking about Diversity, you’re ALWAYS talking about White people. Now if any other race were targeted in that way, there’d be some question about it. But you, the press, or whoever, they act like they’ve never heard of this before.”

#AWCT: “Well I just heard it, from you. So I’ll ask the question again. But you answered the question by talking about Japan and Taiwan. I’m asking you again. Do you feel the White race in the United States, to be more specific, is under attack?”

Bob: “The idea is to get rid of us. Yeah, that’s called genocide.”

…Bob’s points were so obvious and general that there was no getting around them.

Now if you observe carefully what Bob says here too:
“The reason we’re driving them NUTS: Our motto is: We’re not going to talk about any specifics until you stop acting like a MOB. The whole media, the SPLC, the whole crowd. They start shrieking like Orwell’s sheep in his Animal Farm. As soon as somebody says something they don’t like, they start screaming ‘Two legs baa-ad, four legs good’. It’s a MOB!

They’re screaming, and they’re out for money and they’re buzzards. They’re waiting for something like this to happen. Then they can start screaming about something, and that raises good money.”

…By repeatedly characterizing the anti-Whites (interviewer included), using metaphors and pointing out their motivations, it was as if the interviewer were being put into a box he couldn’t get out of. The framework for this box was built by Bob from various angles, almost always sticking to general things everybody knows, and repeatedly reinforcing it with phrases to cement it:

“everybody knows”; “you know”; “we ALL know what you’re talking about and you do too”; “you know it very well”; “everybody knows that”; “the fact is, we all know that”; “you know damn well”; “you know it very well”; “we all know”.

Bob used at least ten such cementing phrases.

The interviewer couldn’t handle it. What Bob said was undeniable and it was being reinforced.

He knew it, Bob knew it, and everybody else knew it too.

You can usually tell most about someone’s reaction via non-verbal signs.

If you carefully observe posture, breathing, eye movement, facial expression, etc. as NLP practitioners, or as interrogators, do.

If you see the person, hear their voice and notice pauses, then you can tell much better the effectiveness of a communication.

During face-to-face encounters it is also easier to MAKE IT PERSONAL.

So I run by new memes in personal encounters.

Now I’ve used the following against resistant audiences and it was consistently THE point when their resistance broke:

“Your children are under the hammer of genocide.”

…

Wondering why this phrase is so effective, I found some reasons.

It is a metaphor: visual, brutal, immediate.

And it contains the word “under” – in the same category of words as “down” and “sub”. (See the article “Drawing in and ON the subconscious”.)

“Under the hammer” also has the meaning of selling off something. So White children are being sold out / betrayed. The conscious mind may not notice such things, but the subconscious / unconscious mind does.

White Children are Under the Hammer of Genocide.

Original Article Posted on White Genocide Project

On Sunday 8th, more than one hundred protesters gathered in Calais, France, to show resistance to certain agendas enforced on the country.

The event was started by a Facebook page called “We will not give the keys to Calais“, and had participants from the French spin-off of the Pegida movement, French Dissent, Sauvons Calais, and the English Defence League.

There were three main topics addressed; the Islamization of Europe, mass immigration, and White Genocide.

The participants shouted slogans such as “France for the French”, “Islam out”, and “Immigrants out.”

They also carried banners saying “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide” and “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” The banners linked to Europe-Rising.com

Though Denis Gaudin, the sub-prefect of Calais, scorned the event, he could not ban it as there was “no risk of disturbing public order” and there would be “sufficient police forces.”

There was a bit of a commotion when someone supporting mass immigration tried to steal one of the French flags, but he was quickly arrested by police.

It’s no mystery that Mommy Professor’s favorite Early Victorian author is Karl Marx. After all, Marx wrote that Intellectuals should rule the world.

So, for Mommy Professor, what’s not to like!

But, unfortunately for Mommy Professor, communism has been discredited… not least because some people have an annoying habit of questioning things:

“If communism is so great, then why do all the communist Workers’ Paradises need machine guns and guard towers to stop people from fleeing?”

Samizdat persistently pointed out something else:

“Communists may have READ Karl Marx; but Anti-Communists have UNDERSTOOD Karl Marx.”

Yet another sore point for Mommy Professor is that the universities didn’t anticipate the fall of the Soviet Union. Ouch. And to add insulating tape to injury, the most popular and enduring Victorian period author is not their Karl Heinrich Marx, but rather the author who created Sherlock Holmes. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes didn’t make it onto Mommy Professor’s reading list, but most people don’t care.

So what does this tell us?
1. That the “high” literature fawned over by Mommy Professor has nothing to do with reality (least of all the future).
2. That the greatest segment of the reading public enjoys seeing a clever investigator find out what is really going on.

Here at BUGS, we have a number of reference points to investigate anti-Whites. You can do a search for these, such as SUB-basics and The SILENCE. It is a commonly experienced phenomenon when SWARMING, that bystanders enjoy seeing incisive points being made by a BUGSER while interrogating an anti-White.

Now even though Sherlock Holmes is fictional and not on Mommy Professor’s reading list, there is more wisdom in a few lines of his adventures than in the entire corpus of Karl Marx.

Here’s a few memorable lines illustrating the concept of The SILENCE:

“Is there any other point to which you would draw my attention?”
“To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”
“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”
“That was the curious incident,”
remarked Sherlock Holmes.

-The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes (1894) ‘Silver Blaze’.

On Saturday October 3rd, the American Freedom Party continued its presidential robocall campaign in the state of Alabama.

The robocalls reached a total of 140,542 people on Saturday (210,174 calls were made). We had 60,469 live answers and 80,703 answering machines were reached, where the entire robocall was recorded. Of the live answers, people listened to the message for an average of 40.42secs.

To date the American Freedom Party has called the states of Idaho, Mississippi and Alabama.

In Mississippi the party reached 186,460 on August 15^th. 85,239 Live answers and 101,221 answering machines. Of the live answers, people listened to the message for an average of 38.07 secs.

In Idaho the party reached a total of 81,649 people on August 1^st. 36,776 live answers and 44,873 answering machines. Of the live answers, people listened to an average of 36.52 seconds.

The purpose of these robocalls is not only to reach the people with our presidential candidates message of white genocide, but to have the media report on our campaigning efforts.

On September 20th, Lena Mitchell wrote an Op-Ed article for Djournal.com about our robocall campaign in Mississippi.

Lena received one of our robocalls on August 15^th and was not impressed.

Lena Mitchell’s article – http://djournal.com/opinion/lena-mitchell-the-fight-to-end-racism-needs-more-than-lip-service/

“Lena’s diatribe against our robocalls in Mississippi is very simple: All good white people should worry about black people day and night, but anyone who worries about white people is a Nazi” says Bob Whitaker the American Freedom Party’s presidential candidate.

“Our robocalls predicted that reaction, stating at the start of the call that the media ignores our message.

“Which is exactly what Lena Mitchell did.”

Following Lena’s article on DJournal.com, two major online publications featured articles on our national robocall campaign; Raw Story and The Daily Beast.

The Daily Beast has an Alexa Rating of 883 globally, which is up 71 positions in the last 3 months. They are ranked 259 within the USA.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/21/white-nationalists-launch-robocalls-about-white-genocide-for-2016-campaign.html

This article couldn’t get any better for us publicity wise…. It quotes the entire Mississippi robocall, links to the mantra page at BUGS and also links to our article on the Idaho robocalls at BUGS. That is some priceless exposure for our presidential campaign, BUGS and the AFP.

And Raw Story with an Alexa Rating of 2,157 globally which is up 245 positions in the last 3 months, (this site is rapidly gaining in popularity). They are ranked 516 in the USA.

https://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/neo-nazis-target-mississippi-and-idaho-residents-with-white-genocide-robocalls/

Shortly after publishing this article Raw Story was contacted by the AFP’s legal team who objected to being labeled as a “neo-nazi” party. Since being contacted Raw Story changed their wording to “extremist”.

The American Freedom Party will be continuing its robocall campaign across the United States, generating awareness for their presidential candidates and message of white genocide, leading up to the election next year.

Will the American Freedom Party be calling your state next?

Alabama Robocall Media Reports:
#1 – http://www.voicesofliberty.com/article/white-genocide-robocalls-going-out-to-180000-alabamans/
#2 – http://bamsarakiilledyou.tumblr.com/post/130412718173/white-genocide
#3 – http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-liberal/2015/10/american-freedom-party-takes-robocall-campaign-to-al-tom-bowie-is-new-vp-nominee-2514506.html
#4 – http://leftinalabama.com/interesting-parallels-between-state-auditor-jim-zeigler-whitaker-street-preacher/
#5 – http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2015/10/american-freedom-party-takes-robocall-campaign-to-al-tom-bowie-is-new-vp-nominee/
#6 – http://www.breakingnewsblast.com/category/bob-whitaker/
#7 – http://www.toledoblade.com/Tom-Walton/2015/10/19/Fringe-candidate-shows-open-racism-s-still-alive-in-politics.html

Idaho Robocall Media Reports (list incomplete):
#1 – http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/01/1407981/-Election-2016-Did-you-receive-the-racist-robocall

I think it would be good to have a list of techniques we use so that people who have spent enough time SWARMING will have a resource for when they are composing mini-Mantras, articles, etc.

Here’s a sample of techniques we use:

Start with obvious reality, such as a well-known fact, and give it a particular spin. E.g.: “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, ”… etc. People agree with it, so it starts up a chain of “yes” responses, and this will make people more likely to agree with you further down.

Images, such as the wonderful illustrations by BBG; and vivid wording, to draw on the visual sense. E.g.: “Picture this. A Witchdoctor and his followers are jumping up and down in a field. They believe that the crops will grow better by following the dancers’ example…” (Psychological research indicates that the visual sense is most commonly the dominant one, so we at BUGS draw on this one the most.)

Metaphors, such as White rabbits, buzzards, Mommy Professor, Screamers, Thugs and Thought Police. (Metaphors are easy for people to grasp, because they work on a more solid, visual level, rather than abstract concepts.) Even “codeword” is a metaphor, and so is “means chasing down”. A lot of the time this is literal too!

Specific grammar to create a specific effect, such as the use of incomplete sentences (HD has commented on Bob’s use of these before). Another technique is to use participles to compact a narrative (instead of using conjunctions); for example: “Their prescriptions having turned out badly, they ALWAYS blame the disbelievers”.

Colliding points of reference, such as linking White Flight with Orwell and people fleeing the Soviet Union.

If others would add to this list of techniques used at BUGS, then we can have a more complete resource, and hopefully something we can all learn from. And just to jump the gun on this, the following quote by Secret Squirrel is so insightful that I’ll add it here:

‘By attacking, he [Bob] points out the contradictions, assigns responsibility and labels the enemy.

Their weakest points are where they contradict themselves and since anti-whites are natural toadies, they don’t like to be exposed and made responsible for the harm they cause.’

A way to judge the success or failure of a state is whether the citizens actually want to LIVE there.

By this standard, the Soviet Union and other communist states were absolute failures. The “citizens” of these so-called “democratic republics” wanted to get out of there so much, that hiding their intentions about wanting to escape, through fear of informers and Big Brother, they devised ingenious methods to evade mine fields, walls, machine gun turrets and barbed wire.

The mine fields of these “democratic republics” had the landmines and gun trip wires on THEIR side of the barbed wire – to keep THEIR citizens from ESCAPING.

Thousands of people were killed in the process of fleeing, and many others were caught and put into FORCED sensitivity training/concentration camps.

Now this may give you the Orwellian creeps: In the so-called “democratic republics” where we live today, we are told, just as in the Soviet Union, that the citizens are very “privileged” to live here. But if White citizens are so privileged, then how do you explain White Flight?

If White people are so “privileged”, how do you explain White Flight?…

Again: If White people are so “privileged”, how do you explain White Flight?………