Archive for category Politics

Bob Raw #016 – Using the Divisions and the REAL Campaign

By Bob Whitaker

The big news at the beginning of this campaign was that Trump decided to go out and gather the fundamentalists, the usual prayers in schools, urgent issues like the ten commandments. He is doing what republicans always have done, which is why the country is practically gone now.

He is worried about dividing the country.

If you are going to take over a country politically you have to use the divisions that are there. You don’t sit around trying to act like they’re not there. That’s insane for a group that takes power in the teeth of the establishment.

For them then to turn around and say “they’re trying not to divide people up”, they’re divided dam it! Trump said he was going to build a $15M wall to divide it. So its a little late on that point. Its just so stupid. Its the same old crap.

In our sense the campaign started when Hilary used the term White Genocide. And no body took her seriously. Course we’ve noticed that Hilary could take her clothes off in public and nobody would notice. She’s just ice station Hilary and no one is all that interested in what she has to say.

But this was important because that use of White Genocide, copied straight from us Gang, that’s the actual news, certainly the campaign, we’re talking about campaign news, that’s not news for another stumblebum republican to dribble prayers in schools to another group of clergymen who are supposed to delivery their little whities the way black minsters delivery their blackies.

The second stage of the real campaign, which is what WE are conducting. I hope that gets through to you, we are conducting the REAL campaign.
When that kooky guy talked about all he wanted for Christmas is White Genocide. Now it is a measure of just how seriously Hilary is taken that she spoke as the national candidate and the phrase barely touched the airwaves. I mean they quoted her of course, she cant do anything that they wont quote, but it wasn’t up to the level of a joke. It was that bad.

This professor was taken seriously. The candidate for the national democratic party for president was not. There is a big lesson in that.

For one thing, everybody knows Hilary is not news. She’s the establishment, the elite as they call themselves. And what she says doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference. So when Hilary comes along and says something about White Genocide, she said something about immigration and birthers that I saw, that was quoted, and it just passed under the radar. And in that case its just that nobody cares. She’s such a bore.

So the real campaign is going to develop around our issues. And our issues are in fact dividing America. And people will say “but those are the issues that are dividing America”, well then those are the important issues aren’t they?

But National Review will say “Oh No, No, No, immigration, nobody cares about that, they’re worried about prayers in schools.”

So the real history of the campaign only contains a couple notes. In this case when White Genocide was first used and the contrast to the national figure that used it first and the fact that it got no reaction what so ever. Their own candidate, the left didn’t even pay attention to her.

 

Using the Divisions and the REAL campaign

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment

The Federal Surplus

By Bob Whitaker:

And BUGSERS punch me with their elbows and whisper, “Bob, your senility is showing. You mean the Federal DEFICIT.”

But this time I’m right for a change.

Yes, Virginia, there was once a Federal SURPLUS.

Briefly.

To understand this, you have to know where Federal revenue came from back then.

About eighty percent of Federal revenue came from tariffs. (You’ll look it up)

And unlike any taxes today, tariffs were dearly loved in major parts of the United States. That is why they once collected too many of them.

Once.

Why was that tax popular? Tariffs were BELOVED in New England because they meant that all the tariffs were paid by Southerners.

Southerners had a choice: They paid the tariffs or they paid more for industrial goods produced in New England.

Tariffs were supposed “to protect American industry” by raising the prices of imported industrial goods.

It was a “very patriotic” tax.

But by 1833 the giant industries in New England didn’t need any “protection.” So a tariff hike just meant higher prices paid by the South to the East or Northeast for goods.

Instead of being a good Democrat and opposing tariff increases, Jackson backed a tariff that was out of sight.

It was supposed to be a Shrewd Move. It would get even New Englanders into opposing this incredible tariff rise.

Every time a politician decides to be Shrewd, it causes a disaster.

Jackson’s Shrewd Move in 1833 very nearly brought on civil war.

Jackson thought that “the Tariff of Abominations” was so high even New Englanders would go to the negotiating table.   He didn’t realize that tariffs were so popular in New England that a congressman who voted against ANY tariff increase would have lost the next election.

The tariffs that were popular in New England were paid in Southern ports. They were an increase to the price of European goods arriving in Southern ports. That allowed New England goods to charge higher prices.

Faced with paying a Federal surplus AND payng more for industrial goods, the South did exactly what many American cities do today about immigration laws: They refused to allow them to be paid in Southern ports.

This was called Nullification, when the port at Charleston refused to enforce Federal law.

We have exactly the same policy today where cities that don’t like immigration laws simply refuse to enforce them.

The difference was that a President today doesn’t dare force local enforcement, while Jackson felt that the Union would fall apart if he allowed South Carolina not to collect the tariffs.

It came very close to a civil war, which we could have won in 1833.

Southern “leaders,” like all respectable conservatives backed down and New England magnanimously gave them all slightly lower increase in tariffs in 1834.

As in America today, the respectable approach destroyed those who allowed it.  To repeat, had we fought in 1833 when the issues was clearly unfair tariffs, we would have won.

But moderates did not fight when the issue was clearly the robbery of one part of America by another.

The South waited, led by Moderation, until the issue was slavery.

The Trump win shows, as Anne Coulter said, that some Americans are finally throwing out the suicidal “moderates.”

The question today, just as it was with the South back then, will we have gone down the road of weakness until it is just plain too late.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Comments

Who Will Trump’s Wall Bring In?

I watched the BBC program which launched the answer to my statement, the constant repetition of a new mantra: “Why did every Communist country have to have a prison wall around it?”

I haven’t seen BUGSERS adopt it, and neither  Jared Taylor nor Dr. Duke has denounced it yet, but I’ve only been using it a year or so. 

Anyway, the other side is beginning to notice my memes the way our side never will. It took them a year, but by now I recognize it when what they are giving is what we used to call The Line.

The BBC mouth had that unmistakable semi-smile about it as he pronounced The Lesson of the Day.

“Why was the Berlin Wall built?  Why was Hardian’s Wall built?”

“To keep some people in and some people out.”

“That’s why the Berlin Wall was built.  To keep some people in and some people out.”

Back to Bob, I was in Berlin at an international refugee conference in 1959. I visited the refugee camps.

East Germany was having zero problems with anyone coming IN.

But the pressure of people wanting OUT had gotten West Gemany to lower the age of voluntarily leaving the People’s Paradise that they had raised the minimum age to 14.

East Germany was losing HALF of its potential work force.

Every other Communist country on earth had a wall to keep people. But when the Berlin Wall went up, not one single media outlet, left or right, MENTIONED that those walls were up around ALL OTHER Communist states!

Don’t worry,  pro-whites will keep it a secret.

Anti-whites are so disciplined. I have already heard several regular people/anti-whites declare “A wall is to keep some people in and some people out,” when I, as usual alone, talked about those Commie walls.

Let me tell the vacuum that you would not get away with saying that TRUMP’S proposed wall would “keep some people in and some people out.”

You would hear the anti-white response in a yell echoing coast-to coast:

“How DARE you!!!!   It’s to keep OUT Mexicans!”

They would SCREAM it, and there would be no Jared Yaylors or National Reviews to hush it up.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Comments

Part 2

In our last exciting adventure, I pointed out that the enemy has developed an argument against my simple observation that all Communist countries must build walls to keep their people trapped in their new Worker’s Paradise.

But it REALLY sounds weird if you have never been in the BUSINESS of fighting propaganda wars.

Part of the game is recognizing that some memes from our side is answering a meme from the other side, AND THAT SOMEONE WHO DOESN’T DO THIS PROFESSIONALLY WOULD HAVE NOT THE SLIGHTEST HINT OF WHAT IS GOING IN.

In your world these connections have no connection.

This is true for an outsider looking at any battle that is being waged by convincing people, be that the product of Communism or consumer goods.

Right now there is a leading ad genius who is searching to see what HIS nemesis is putting together. And complaining that some Pepsi publicity is honing in on what is being used by Royal Crown Cola.

If this writer showed you an ad and also showed you one of his, it is very unlikely you would see what to him is painfully obvious; That ad is countering HIM, some campaign he has going that he considers subliminal.

So anti-whites and rightists, who have no concept of real menial competition would laugh and point like any other ignorant hunk of trash would.

But the contracted writer for Coke has a gigantic advantage over me. People believe him because he has the title of “advertising writer” and a huge new house to show it off.

If you fight for a cause, there is no visible difference between him and the ineffective ones.

When John Ashbrook, my congressman boss, became ranking minority member and took over staffing of the House Education and Labor, I took over as boss of staffing on the Ed and Labor Committee, he gave me three desks, and an independent staff.

John didn’t even notice I had three full time jobs until our Chief of Staff mentioned it to him. And by then there was nothing to be done about it.

So a couple of years later he died, I had my own heart attacks and nervous breakdown, and everything we did was credited to those who had the time and effort to SPARE to CLAIM CREDIT.

From the beginning I have told you that Washington politics takes everything you’ve got, so there are two types of people in them: 1) Those who DO things and 2) those who take credit for them.

How long do you think it will be before the person who brought “white genocide” into the daylight and showed how effective it could be will get any credit for it AT ALL?

I knew the score LONG before I got myself into this game.

The point here is that a person like Trump, who is new to this form of combat, assumes that the guy who can sell vacuum cleaners can sell ideas.

My answer is, Candidates like our Hoover man can sell, but not put ideas in action.

I am sure you have known quite well that this sort of rule existed inside that cyclone where our society’s direction is determined.

For me to say that a whole side of the political spectrum has been endangered by me personally will get a smiling No Comment.

To a great extent what I am fighting for was over your head, but I have never before encountered a group like BUGS. We are nationwide, which previously took a lifetime to accomplish by itself.

No one DARES to confront me and everybody knows I created it, but not one of our “leaders” will mention it.

But my problem is honestly not the one the trash would instantly shout, it is I traded money and fame for Power.

And I GOT the POWER. Nothing else can equal the new chance my race is getting now that white genocide is being exposed and every “opposition” speech doesn’t turn into an abortion debate.

But now I must bring up this battle between me and the anti-whites where they are forced to repeat just how dangerous my approach is.

The SPLC for once has to tell its contributors the absolute truth, to quote me directly in order to make it known that they are facing a whole new battle front.

No longer can an anti-white rich man just call some Pay For Pray Preacher and get this Leader of the Right to denounce anyone who is not allowing to get colors immigrating into them mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee.

No longer can every public official who shows doubts about immigration just get a call from some conservative who is directed to scream that he get back on abortion or Prayers in Schools.

SPLC is telling people that this Whitaker is changing the rules with which they are thoroughly familiar.

The only people who have a heavy stake in the Old Way seems to be those I once respected as those who had the courage to be pro-white.

Me or the money-raisers, which do you imagine anti-whites are rooting for?

Those who stuck with WOL suspected there was this sort of story behind the story, a lot to learn.

Would you like some more in this vein? Or should we get back to commenting on comments of those commenting and which item they make today’s “hot topic?”

Here, you will find that every single thing Trump won on is what I was pushing then. If you read our “pro-white leaders”, you will wonder why they bother to write the same articles over and over.

The battle I am fighting largely involves a time gap between the time I put it here and everybody on our side has forgotten it and the time it becomes Really New Stuff.

“Nobody ever HEARD of White Genocide.”

Maybe the problem is not that the message was not there but that heads then were in the same place they are now.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

The End of an Era — I Hope

In 1944 or 1945, my mother and father were in the line at bank in Atlanta. Ahead of them there was a New Yorker screaming obscenities about the delay.

My mother saw my father walk up to the Big City guy and say something to him. She said the city boy turned white as a sheet and go quiet.

What my father said, very quietly, amounted to this:  “yelling that kind of language may scare people in New York, but a lot of us are Southerners and our wives are with us.”

“Thet can get you killed down here.”

“Be careful on your way back to your hotel.”

No more shrieks.

That was the end of a generation.

The time and place when you could get killed behaving that way around Southern women was about to end. The groveling World War 2 Generation was about to replace the men.

Integrationists and modern conservatives were about to replace the people who simply would not put up with runaway crime and a white population engaged in White Flight.

Even conservative voters would demand and elect people like today’s Trump who talked big in the campaign and then put anything serious at the end of a very, very long list as they appointed big names, and went back to the Same Old Shit about budgets or whatever millionaires talk about at the club.

I have spent a lifetime watching this crap play out, and the Loyal Politicals Serfs chant “Patience” as time rolls by.

I’ll be DAMNED if I am going to do that AGAIN.

Get off your ass, Trump!

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Comments