Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Also calling Anti-Whites 'Genocidists'?

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Also calling Anti-Whites 'Genocidists'?

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • 12/13/2011 at 10:55 pm #14089
    mandela
    Participant

    Also I have a question about the mantra. The part that says bringing non Whites into only White countries. What about Tibet? They were swamped by the Chinese to finish them off.

    12/13/2011 at 11:12 pm #14090
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ MarkMuses:

    “…until our terminology enters the common vernacular.”

    Agreed!

    Won’t everyone please read Peter’s post again, while keeping in mind that a large part of implanting our message in Whites’ minds is to implant the sounds that carry that message until those sounds are bouncing around in Whites’ minds in their sleep! Those sounds are “Anti-White,” “White Genocide,” and the all-important “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

    That last one could do for us what “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should” did for Winstons decades ago.

    The many-titted cow “Anti-White” cannot be improved upon! All the milk it gives is pure White!

    12/13/2011 at 11:18 pm #14091
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ mandela: Welcome to bugs, mandela!

    Note the phrase “Everybody says…” in the Mantra. Everybody isn’t saying the Chinese should pour into Tibet. In fact, Everybody is saying that the Chinese should NOT pour into Tibet! While at the same time they say non-whites SHOULD pour into White countries, into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.

    Happy bugstering!

    12/13/2011 at 11:35 pm #14094
    mandela
    Participant

    Thanks HD! Well explained. If people question the statement ‘everybody says that’, the come back could be ‘everybody who is Anti-White does. I also think Anti-White cant be improved on for now, but genocidists might be OK to throw in now and again, but I dont see myself using it. I think the work you guys are doing is a very important part of our chance of survival.

    12/14/2011 at 1:13 am #14098
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ mandela: “everybody who is Anti-White does.” I like that! I’ll use that. I tend to get mentally dragged into the details of what adversaries are saying, instead of just returning to the Mantra as we should, and as your reply nicely does.

    I can’t imagine a term that could ever replace anti-white myself. It’s like trying to imagine the anti-whites finding a better word for their use than the r-word. They have a lot of other words too, but when you’re ahead in the game by 5 touchdowns you can afford to give your second stringers some field time. (And I think anti-semite is a separate but related discussion. That word is required to maintain the higher status of some victimhoods over others).

    And it’s not that I think the word “genocidist” should be verboten, any more than I think the word “assimilate” should be verboten. That word appears in the Mantra, but in a way that builds toward the Mantra’s message of White Genocide rather than distracts from it. I’m happy with Bob using any word he wants to! I don’t trust my own skill to do so!

    12/14/2011 at 2:02 am #14100
    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    @Adelheim

    If they are White AND they are anti-White, do they then suffer from “anti-White syndrome.”

    Anti-White syndrome: Most commonly associated with a tourette’s-like outburst of anti-Europoid terms brought on in a seemingly reflexive and spontaneous manner. Weird and painful facial contortions are frequently exhibited while uttering the most nonsensical anti-White phrases. Some scientists believe that EXTREME pro-White sentiment can trigger a strong outburst from the afflicted.

    12/14/2011 at 2:06 am #14101
    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    Petey hits the nail on the head again.

    Nike NEVER went from “Just do it” to “Just do it some MORE.”

    12/14/2011 at 2:12 am #14102
    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    HD:

    “While at the same time they say non-whites SHOULD pour into White countries, into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.”

    Fixed it…

    [While at the same time anti-Whites DEMAND non-whites pour into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.]

    They don’t just say it. They insist and DEMAND. An ocean of difference. Also, never miss a chance to IMPOSE our terms. Saying “they” in lieu of anti-White is a misstep.

    12/14/2011 at 2:22 am #14103
    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    White genocide is a three part deal, folks.

    MASSIVE non-White (third world) immigration.
    Assimilation.
    Intermarriage.

    Most don’t get to the other two because YentileTewb only lets you have so many characters. I have a couple that cover all three, but most of mine don’t.

    12/14/2011 at 2:26 am #14104
    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    “You bastards like to say you are anti-racist. What you are is genocidists?

    Anti-racist is a code-Word for genocidist??”

    Really?

    That’s a sick joke, LN.

    12/14/2011 at 2:44 am #14105
    Secret Squirrel
    Participant

    @mandela
    “Also I have a question about the mantra. The part that says bringing non Whites into only White countries. What about Tibet? They were swamped by the Chinese to finish them off.”

    Exactly. Tibet is one of the glaring contradictions you can rub their noses in.

    Here’s one you can use:

    “China has tried to force immigration (and integration of groups like Tibetan Nomads) into Tibet. This has routinely been labeled Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide by the UN and “Anti-racist” groups. Yet you will never hear a peep about the clear and consistent Targeting of White Children.

    Forced immigration into all white countries and only white countries (anywhere else is labeled genocide)

    Forced integration in all white countries and only white countries (anywhere else is labeled genocide)

    Then they push interracial relationships in all white countries and only white countries …….hmmmmm….there is a pattern emerging here

    then they promote a Brown future for ALL White Countries…hmmmm

    …….SURE is difficult to see how the word Genocide applies here.”

    12/14/2011 at 3:23 am #14107
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Genseric: “Fixed it” Thanks!

    12/14/2011 at 5:58 am #14117
    meawhiterabbit
    Participant

    i usually agree with everything LN says (because everything he says is perfect mantra talk) but i have to disagree with this. Anti-White is taking hold. We need to fire it at them over and over again until they want to vomit (to paraphrase Horus!)

    12/14/2011 at 9:41 am #14123
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Remember also to push the following: According to the United Nations Charter on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the immigration which has taken place in many western countries over the last few decades can be classed as cultural genocide (ethnocide). The “anti-racists” are genocidists.

    12/14/2011 at 10:06 am #14125
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    Yes, have to say I’m in the camp of keeping purely on message with ‘Anti-White’ at the moment. I’ve seen encouraging signs from various places that anti White is just starting to take root in the mainstream population, so we really need to keep on nourishing it until we’ve grown a nice healthy tree!

    12/14/2011 at 10:30 am #14127
    Lord Nelson
    Participant

    Like I said folks it was just an idea. No big deal. I am always on the loolk out for the killer punch. But I have my doubts about it too. Genocidist, is one hell of a nasty label to stick on someone, but maybe now is not the time.

    For me, best just to stick with ‘Anti-White’!

    12/14/2011 at 12:33 pm #14143
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    Don’t let it discourage you from thinking LN, you’ve hit on some great ideas so far! I constantly use one of your other suggestions ‘White and NORMAL’ whenever I get the opportunity as that really gets the anti Whites going!

    Genocidist, anti White terrorist, anti White extremist etc I think are all great possible terms for the future and I certainly wouldn’t like to be labelled with any of them!

    12/14/2011 at 1:39 pm #14146
    Lord Nelson
    Participant

    Iceknight.

    Cheers, but I did not come up with ‘White and normal’. I think it may have been Horus on FTWR.

    12/14/2011 at 3:46 pm #14154
    meawhiterabbit
    Participant

    “White and normal” is a Horus phrase. But i don’t think Horus cares if he is credited. As he always says, take it, use it don’t credit anyone just use the stuff. We are all here for one goal. To bring down this system that promotes White genocide.

    12/14/2011 at 10:06 pm #14178
    Peter Whiterabbit
    Participant

    LN, don’t worry, we don’t blame you, we blame the guy on Stormfront;)


    @mandela    , ole Bob talks about “Everybody says” and “ONLY white nations” in at least one of his porch talks podcasts. He explained how he developed the “Everybody says” part of the mantra by using it in thousands of arguments and seeing that it works. The person who is arguing with him may come back with Tibet or Singapore but the exception makes the point that much stronger to the audience. We make a point to the audience because they are going through every non-white nation in their minds and coming to the realization that we are correct. Bob explains it much better in his podcast.

    I recommend everyone listen to Bob’s porch talk podcasts. Horus’ first few podcasts and his interviews with Truck Roy are great intros as well.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.