B. U. G. S.

The old adage which pokes fun at anti-Whites from way back goes something like, and I’m sure Bob can attest to its authenticity, “I hate bigots.”

It’s like saying “I hate Haters.” Well that makes you a hater does it not? Or “I am intolerant of intolerance.” Hahaha!

‘White and normal’ is right up there with ‘code word’ and ‘anti-white.’ It drives them nuts! I try using at least one of these terms in every post. Most of all, I think what makes them so crazy is that we are now asserting our own terminology.

Would that be much different than ‘anti-white racist’ or ‘anti-white bigot‘ ?

On previous discussion it was thought that adding such qualifiers distracts from ‘Anti-white’.

They might start focusing on the word extremism or terrorism instead of anti-white.

Anti-white is extremism and terrorism. When you are against a race you are pro genocide by definition.

The Jews needed to add the qualifier because their use of anti-semitism was as a boy who cries wolf. They kept crying anti-semitism when there wasn’t any there.

GENSERIC – ‘Thoughts on “anti-White extremism” and “anti-White terrorism” as pro-White terms?’
Yes Anti-White terrorism exists (South Africa Plaas mord) (farm murders)
However,
I personaly wouldn’t use those terms (at this time). I’ve heard a lot about ‘Muslim extremists’ and ‘Islamic terrorism’ but we’re told that ‘moderate Islam’ is quite OK.

As a Christian I reject Islam as a competing belief system that has ZERO place in my country whether it is ‘moderate’ ‘extreme’ or ‘terrorist’. It’s ALL got to go,no compromise

Similarly I don’t care if an Anti-White is a ‘moderate’,’extreme’ or ‘terrorist’.They’ve ALL got to go,no compromise.
I’m told ‘moderate’ Isalm is the recruiting field of ‘extremists’ and ‘terrorists’,it stands to reason that ‘moderate’ Anti-Whites are the recruiting field of the ‘extremist’ and ‘terrorist’ Anti-Whites
Pull the weed out at the roots,not just prune back the leaves !

Incidently I have NEVER heard a ‘moderate Muslim’ condemn ‘Muslim terror-ism’ or ‘Muslim extremists’,and I have NEVER heard a ‘moderate’ Anti-White condemn Anti-White terrorism or Anti-White extremists.

It ALL has to go,they are ALL the enemy therefore,it doesn’t seem worthwhile to distinguish.
As always I’m flexible and open to persuasion : )

————————-
MEAWHITERABBIT – If these Anti-Whites send you a P.M don’t bother replying via P.M,if you want to reply head back to the thread in question and reply via the comment section.Say something like ‘I got your P.M,but there’s nothing I want to say that can’t be said in public.Every White country and …..’roll back into the Mantra.

DO NOT get into a long multi-P.M one on one duel.It’s pointless.Even if you win WE still lose because NOBODY else will see your victory.The point is to make a public example of them (baseline humiliation tactics,Horus covered it in the first few FTWR)
They win even if they lose because they’ve taken you off the frontline and tied you up in a private arguement which NOBODY White and Normal can see.

I don’t read P.M’s from known Anti-Whites anymore,the death threats and vile language became boring.In anycase I don’t care what they have to say,they are Anti-Whites,and the Anti-Whites have got to go !
P.S Everytime I see your user name it seems to read MEAN-White-rabit. LOL Keep being mean to the Anti-Whites.

Anti-Whites don’t say “Nazi extremist,” since they’ve made “Nazi” as extreme as one can get. Similarly, I don’t think we should say “anti-white extremist,” since it implies there are moderate anti-whites that are acceptable.

“Anti-White terrorist” might be okay because it refers to particular activity, and the word “terrorist” might rub off advantageously on “anti-white.” The term might work kind of like “Nazi thug” works. I’d keep a suspicious eye on it though.

HD is right. As soon as Nazi stops intimidating White people, they will start using, Vicious-Nazi-Extremist. You wait and see.

These labels anti-Whites have been using on White people for the last 50 years, are nothing but Verbal Whips.

As soon as a White person starts to drift from the heard, the anti-White cracks their whip, tears a little flesh off their victim, and they step back into line.

Now White people finally have a whip, to use on their oppressors.

Anti-White! – Crack!

Anti-White! – Crack!

So don’t waste it guys. Use it well. 🙂

Something I tried out the other day, when responding on an article for April Gaede, was asking an anti-White, “Which anti-White group do you belong to?”

I think it is only fair to ask start asking them which anti-White group they belong to, as the anti-Whites in the media are always talking about “White Supremacist Groups”.

The Anti-Whites have their own version of these so called “hate groups”. So lets start labeling them as well.

“White and Normal

White and Normal

White and Normal”

Is that one of Bob’s? It is very good. 🙂

I am wondering how pinpointing their anti-white affiliation proves anything about white genocide to the audience. Is this not setting ones self up for tailgating/getting off topic? How does this add value to the debate? What points are being made with it?

-Which anti-White group do you belong to/SO you still belong to anti-White group ABC?

+Group ABC is NOT anti-White. blah blah blah

-Oh yes it is. Can you explain how this sin’t an anti-White activity? off topic off topic

Genseric
How about this?

“Which White GeNOcide promoting group, do you belong to anti-White?”

Asking them that question is only meant to return the insult as it is given. They will never answer a question that assumes their guilt. Would you answer a question phrased like that? I wouldn’t. lol