Lately National Review had an article in which it praised everything liberal Democrats had done until 1965. National Review was founded in 1955 to fight those great liberal accomplishments.
This is neoconservatism. A neoconservative says that everything liberals did was right until on or about January 1, 1970. He says that every warning anti-liberals gave about liberal policies before, on, or about January 1, 1970 was wrong.
So liberals are able to become neoconservatives while never admitting they were ever wrong.
The difference between us old anti-liberals and neocons is a hell of a lot more than just theory.
One of the Great Accomplishments National Review worships liberals for is the end of colonialism. We said, “Give non-white countries full sovereignty? You’ve got to be NUTS!”
Now, suddenly, non-white countries like North Korea and Iran are getting nuclear weapons. If a non-white country has the same sovereignty as a white country, OF COURSE they are going to get nuclear weapons.
According to liberal doctrine, they have every right to do so.
The neocon argument is very familiar. They say:
“We love colored folks, but only if they stay in their place.”
You have to decide whether white countries and colored countries are equal are not. We said they weren’t. National Review is on its knees begging forgiveness for being associated with us.
Since then there has been OPEC and the spread of nuclear weapons. Africa is a total disaster. Even National Review admits that.
We warned that integration was aimed at destroying the white race. Both conservatives and liberals not only admit that, but they brag about it. They demand the final solution to the white problem, which they phrase “the race problem.”
But this “race problem” does not exist in Asia or Africa, half the habitable world. Immigration and integration are the solution to “the race problem” only in white countries. No one demands immigration or integration in non-white countries.
You have to decide, “Are whites and non-whites equal?”
We said no. The neocons and respectable conservatives say, “Yes, but….”
Liberalism led to where we are now. From the get-go. Neocons are nuts.
#1 by Elizabeth on 04/24/2005 - 5:36 pm
I used to read the National Review, but that was back when it was pretty much
the only “conservative” magazine.
I read The American Spectator when I can get the time to go to a library that
subscribes to it, and read some copies. (Get a student rate, please!)
I hate “respectable.” It’s so _dull_!
#2 by Bob on 04/24/2005 - 8:21 pm
Elizabeth:
“I hate “respectable.” It’s so _dull_!”
I LOVE that line!
#3 by Don on 04/25/2005 - 10:47 pm
RE: Neocons are nuts.
I think Neocons are cons and their attitude toward the average American citizen is “never give a sucker an even break.” Playing “Top Sucker” is not my idea of fun.
Question: What do the top Neocons have in common?
Hint1: What did most of the Communists Revolutionaries in 1917 have in common?
Hint2: What do most of the Oligarchs plundering Russia have in common?
Hint3: What do most of the Media Masters have in common?
#4 by Don on 04/26/2005 - 1:14 am
I looked up neocon and found this:
Informal. A neoconservative: “The neocons and hard-liners have long felt that no Soviet leader could be trusted” (New York Times).
———————————————————
Excerpted from American Heritage Talking Dictionary
Copyright © 1997 The Learning Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Honest. I did not make this up. We should trust Perle, Wolfowitz, Kristol, and Kagan instead. Isn’t that a great name for a law firm? Offices right next to Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe.
#5 by Don on 04/26/2005 - 2:02 am
I think respectable conservatives should have a “K” or “U” tattooed on their forehead. This is known as truth in advertising.
#6 by Don on 04/26/2005 - 2:24 pm
Question: What is the first big social event in the life of a neocon?
#7 by Bob on 04/26/2005 - 10:04 pm
OK Don.
Give!
#8 by Bob on 04/26/2005 - 10:11 pm
Don,
William Bennett said critics of neocons say necons are all Jews.
Bennett said he proved the opposite. He is a Catholic.
When a black man says that, the media call it tokenism.
Oddly enough, nobody said that about Bennett.
Surprise, surprise.
Yawn.
#9 by H.S. on 04/27/2005 - 12:44 am
DON: Question: What is the first big social event in the life of a neocon?
BOB: Give!
—
ME TOO.
I know this will be great at the office. They’re quick. I must confess – I have no good clue.
#10 by Don on 04/27/2005 - 11:34 am
RE: William Bennett said critics of neocons say necons are all Jews. Bennett said he proved the opposite. He is a Catholic.
What, did his jewish doctor give him a good deal on a lobotomy?
RE: OK Don. Give!
Aha, we are finally raising some money to promote Why Johnny Can’t Think. I can buy off on that. Oh you mean …… come on, guys, you all are bright people. Don’t be bashful. Initials are BM and that does not stand for Barry Manilow. Apologies to female neocons, but you have to make a choice.
#11 by Don on 04/27/2005 - 2:44 pm
RE:I know this will be great at the office. They’re quick.
H.S. – Something I say which you can repeat at the office? I must be slipping. If not, are there any openings?
#12 by Bob on 04/27/2005 - 4:07 pm
Don, you are starting to say things that sound obscure but are actually meaningless.
Get off it.