NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Here is something very simple to add if anyone challenges genocide: International Jurists determined in 1960 that China committed “genocide” in Tibet just by [i]shutting down Tibetan monasteries and religious schools.[/i]
Add to that the fact that there are more than 100 million aliens in the USA (1 in 3 inhabitants), California went down from 98% white in the 1930’s to about 40% white today, the Associated Press online projects that at current rates whites will be a minority by 2043, the UK Government project that Britons will be a minority in Britain by around 2060.
If Communist China committed genocide according to international law by shutting down schools, then how is the largest invasion in the history of the world not?!
Comment by Pain —
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
More commentary on Bob’s Mantra.
There is an advantage to saying “everybody” and “genocide.” It leads to control of the argument. People have never heard of such before and they think it is outrageous so they think it will be an easy win to debate. They are thinking that it is not just politically incorrect, but outrageously incorrect. Believing it an easy win, they will keep coming back to the word “genocide.” Each time they do allows you to add something new to the debate and constant repetition of the concept genocide.
Thus even when you do not respond, they are repeating what we want over and over again. They may think they have won — by repeating out word genocide. This is how getting them to adopt our language is so valuable.
Another fun tactic is the withholding of proof until later. Simplifying remarks tends to make it stand out and sound outrageous. Maybe there’s a fact or a figure which really proves our argument. They will deny the fact. Wait. They will say, “See you can’t prove it.” Then they will commit there entire argument to that fact which they think you cannot prove. Once they have, come back with the proof. Then they have to change tactics, which they will again and again.
This is the joy of the internet. Years ago, you would have had to clip every article you read with scissors and you would have to take notes from every you book read to prove anything. Now there’s Google.
Even so, Bob’s way is best. Stick to facts that are obvious so you don’t have to prove anything. This is called prima facie evidence, by the way. It’s used in court.
Facts and figures from the internet should never become a way to justify yourself. Bob’s right: we should never justify ourselves. Keep statements simple and you won’t have to. But facts and figures can be thrown in for some fun — toillustrate the obvious.
Comment by Pain —
Recent Comments