In some way or another, I think that everybody who is concerned about white survival, has a problem, whether a christian or big, tough, non-beleiver. We just can’t see very far ahead. And we are not all that sure of what we can hang on to of the past. It is a bottle neck, and we NEED a broader view.
This is where things like “Practical History” and “SUB Urban” are really helpful. I pass them on, although I really don’t know what anybody thinks.
I don’t see anything here that is faith destroying. Wordism would have HAD to come in, and perhaps even served some purpose for a while. But when it doesn’t serve us anymore, it’s time to get rid of it, while keeping what should never be gotten rid of. This is where I think that we are historically. It’s a feverous time but “Courage, God mends all.”
Shari is making her usual mistake. She provides a brilliant summary but forgot to apologize for it the way she used to. BUGS is corrupting her.
On Christianity, she says:”Wordism would have HAD to come in…”
That is a summary of all I have said in one short phrase. I am SO relieved to see someone here SAY it!
Jesus is a Hero and he kept simplifying things. Instead of insisting people read the Old Testament, he quoted it, simplified it and stated repeatedly that HE, PERSONALLY, stood for Salvation.
Then he went on the Cross to prove it.
Jesus gave us a simple choice::
He said, Believe that I am God, or DON’T.
The practical problem is that one cannot make a Living just preaching THAT. So we got the Wordist bureaucracy we call The Church.
My Nordic soul cannot fail to be in awe of Christ. I may say Yes or I may say No, but the choice he offered is beyond praise.
The Wordist disease that, as Shari says, inevitably grew up around Christ is just a stink.
My opinion is that Yes or No is Christianity. The rest is “Christianity.”
Recent Comments