B. U. G. S.

That article points out and hopefully illuminates that the Mantra does not express opposition to intermarriage per se, it expresses opposition to the imposition of conditions that impel mass intermarriage, “with all those non-whites.” I think the article needs to be displayed as a BUGS-approved point on a BUGS-related website where it can be referred to when needed. Below is the first comment to it, by a BUGSer, made during the period it was displayed on FWG. My bold-facing:

DECEMBER 13, 2017: “I copy/pasted that excerpt recently because I thought it was so powerful. I sent it to an old friend who is married to a non-White woman because I thought it would help explain to him how I felt. I don’t think he is a bad person because of his intermarriage and I had hoped he would understand that I’m against White Genocide and not against him and his wife. He just accused me of being racist and full of hatred. Some people just can’t be reached. It’s like a mental wall that can’t be penetrated. Anti-Whites love to get us to tailgate onto side issues like individual cases of intermarriage because that is a familiar battleground for them.”

I’ll post just one tweet from a twitter page that has several BUGSer tweets that IMO exhibit drift, and if the BUGSer who posted this one recognizes it, I hope he will forgive me, since almost without exception, all of his tweets are either good or great (truly), rather better than I’d expect to do myself. My bold-facing:

“If race mixing is so wonderful, why is it imposed on ONLY white countries? Admit it anti-white: it’s not about “race mixing”; it’s about mixing whites out of existence – #WhiteGenocide.”

Most readers are not going to buy that intermarriage is “imposed,” and that’s just one problem with opposing intermarriage in isolation from the context it’s put in in the Mantra. The conditions that produce intermarriage at a rate high enough to wipe out our race are what is imposed, and that’s easily pointed out. But Sarkozy’s threat isn’t yet policy, I don’t think.

We used to do this kind of critiquing of each other’s postings more often than we do now. Again, I hope no offense is taken.

I hope the BUGSer who posted this in a comment on BUGS won’t feel he’s being attacked, although I fear it may appear so…lol! 🙂

“When I post, the one topic which elicits the most visceral responses is: (interracial marriage/ race mixing) in white and only white countries has only one purpose, White Genocide.”

Okay, if our metric is visceral responses, how about “Da joos in white countries have only one purpose, White Genocide”?

Sure, when you attack sacred cows head on, you get visceral responses that blot out the Mantra message you’re trying to deliver, which is why the Mantra doesn’t do that and we don’t do that.

And intermarriage per se is certainly a sacred cow. Bob describes it: “that God of Respectability, Marriage for Love between a Negro and a white who happen to LOVE each other.” http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2018/09/22/i-think-the-word-displacement-is-fatal-2/

But in a chat a few of us had about this issue, a BUGSer cited that article in support of BUGSers opposing intermarriage head on. And another BUGSer stated, “We have to outright oppose interbreeding, intermarrying etc.”

Doing that is a serious corruption of the Mantra and its approach. Where are the memes Bob developed that attack intermarriage outright?

Bob’s point in that article is that cucks use the term “displacement” instead of “White Genocide” to grasp for respectability (good luck, cucks!) by avoiding any taint of being opposed to the sacred cow of intermarriage. To translate that as Bob’s instruction to BUGSers to confront intermarriage outright instead of in the style of the Mantra is an error in logic, probably a classical one.

In another article that was cited in that chat, http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/02/12/dealing-with-the-true-love-crap/, Bob gives his best response when anti-whites do their intermarriage bit:

“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”

I love that! I can think of a recent occasion on which I wish I’d remembered it. Among its several virtues is the extremely important fact that it doesn’t oppose intermarriage per se, or “outright,” or however you want to say it, but instead, it puts intermarriage exactly in the same context that Bob put it in in the Mantra: mass immigration and assimilation.

Bob is eternally a delight. How does he do it. By being brilliant, but also by keeping his eye on the ball.

I’ll repeat that I think the article I pasted into my first comment should be displayed as a BUGS-approved point on a BUGS-related website, where it can be referred to when needed whenever BUGSers stray on this issue, instead of having to go through a whole line of argument each time.

That reply by Bob should be included with the article as being the best response on the issue.

I look forward hopefully to some other commentary, especially commentary that disagrees! 🙂

“I think it is a mistake to say ‘…intermarriage per se is not the problem for us.’”

Feedback on articles is always invited!

If you (or anyone else) would care to comment on them, I’d also be interested to know your thoughts about the BUGSer tweet and recommended posting that I quoted above, as well as your thoughts on the concerns I expressed about each when I quoted them. (The two items are in italics in my comments above at 10/14/2018 at 8:53 pm and 10/16/2018 at 12:17 pm respectively):

“If race mixing is so wonderful, why is it imposed on ONLY white countries? Admit it anti-white: it’s not about “race mixing”; it’s about mixing whites out of existence – #WhiteGenocide.”

“When I post, the one topic which elicits the most visceral responses is: (interracial marriage/ race mixing) in white and only white countries has only one purpose, White Genocide.”

I’ll be very interested to read all further replies, but I need to try not to post any more on this thread.

For swarming, I think this reply by Bob is pure gold:

“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”

@WmWhite: It sounds like it’s time for you to give up and just compose directly on the thread, since that worked for you? I’m not going to be any help, since I’m a tech dummy. I’m told I should direct you to post these kind of problems on the Tech thread, where I assume they are likely to be seen and attended to:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/forum-tech-issues-to-keymasters/page/2/

But yeah, maybe the problem you describe does cut down the discussion here. Post the comment you just posted here on the tech thread.

Beefcake’s podcasts are a treasure that should be preserved and listened to by BUGSers old and (especially) new, but I think that first sentence by him quoted by WmWhite is unfortunately worded:

“Anti-Whites insist Whites cannot be allowed anywhere exclusive for our race, and they enforce conditions which lead to interracial marriages intended to destroy our race.”

If that wording was on an early podcast that I helped edit, and it slipped by me, I goofed. This is the wording I would have recommended:

“Anti-Whites insist Whites cannot be allowed anywhere exclusive for our race, and they enforce conditions which lead to a rate of interracial marriage that’s intended to destroy our race.”