Archive for November 10th, 2005

Historical Context

Mohammed was born in 570 or 571 AD. He did not begin his preaching until he was in his forties.

That means that Islam did not exist for the first six centuries in which Christianity developed.

For fourteen centuries Christians have looked at their world as divided into Christian Europe and teh Moslem World, which controls he Holy Land.

But the point I want to make is the usual Bob Point. It so obvious it is ignored:

The world in which Christianity developed did not have a single Moslem in it.

Obviously you cannot have the slightest idea of how Christianity developed unless you know who WAS in that pre-Moslem world.

It was world of two superpowers: Rome and Iran.

When I refer to “Rome” I am referring to a people who did not know they had Fallen.

What wee call the Fall of Rome was when the City of Rome was conquered by the barbarians, meaning us.

When “Rome fell” to us barbarians, the Roman Empire which had been moved to Constantinople long since considered it a great loss.

But our history says that that was “The Fall of Rome.” In our history the day that the City of Rome fell the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

When Mexico lost the Mexican War in 1848 it lost half its territory to the United States. They didn’t like it. They thought it was a disaster. But you would have had a little trouble explaining to the Mexicans that, after 1848, Mexico ceased to exist.

So when the city of Rome fell, the Roman Empire was not aware that it had ceased to exist.

Our history says that the Roman Empire ended when the city of Rome fell. There was still what we call the Byzantine Empire, but Rome was gone.

But the Roman Empire still considered itself the Roamn Empire, just as Mexico still insisted it was Mexico after 1848.

In fact the world in which Christianiy developed paid very little attention to The Fall of Rome.

What they DID pay attention to was the two superpowers of their time, the Roman Empire and Iran.

No Moslems. The struggle for the world was between the Roman Empire and Iran.

In fact, the Roman Empire and Iran agreed that what happened out in the barbarian wilds of Britain or Gaul or Italy was not important.

It uis easy to explain to modern theologians that “Byzantium,” which still insisted it not only existed but was still the Roman Empire, was not that inerested in what happened among the barbarians.

What they CANNOT realize is that the Roman Empire back then described the two superpowers, Iran and their Roman Empire, as “the two eyes of civilization.” They lived in a world of two civilized empires, Rome and Iran.

Iran, remember, was still white.

No historian of Christianity is capable of realizing that Iran was the other superpower of the time.

Iran’s religion was Zoroastrianism, which was a religion entirely restricted to members of the Aryan race. By the time Islam began, Zoroastrianism was eighteen centuries old.

So Cyrus “did the world of God” in the Old Testament, the only non-Jew so described.

So the Magi, who were Iranian Zoroastrians, accepted Christ.

It means little today that Jesus was described as the Savior of both Persia and Rome. It meant a LOT then.

In their desperation to avoid real history, we have made the Magi into nothing but roaming “wise men.”

In the time the Book of Matthew was written the Magi represented half of the civilized world.

How can you even discuss the history of Christianity if you aren’t fully aware of that?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

Sex and Suicide

One thing you notice when you look over the Wise Sayings of the old Wodenist religion is how many of them tell you why you shouldn’t commit suicide.

This is a very Aryan, Nordic problem. We always had the problem of asking ourselves that, if life is not worth living, why not kill yourself?

And historically very few people’s lives were worth living. But only the white man had a serious problem with this question. Most people have simply followed the animal programming to go on living. But the Aryan is an inventive being. He questions things that animals and other Great Civilizations never consider.

This has led us to the moon. But it has also led us to suicide.

Christianity had two things to offer to our two biggest concerns, sex and suicide.

It said, No Sex and No Suicide.

At the other end of the Indo-European migration, in India, there was the old religion we could compare to the Jews, Hinduism, and then there was the blue-eyed Savior, Gautama Buddha.

Hinduism also offered a solution to suicide, but not to sex. Hinduism said that when your body dies your consciousness does not die, it just moves on. They did not consider reincarnation to be a religious concept.

In fact, just as you and I consider that when one dies the default condition is then total oblivion, this idea never occurred to ancient Indians. They assumed that consciousness and the body were entirely separeate thing.

But the critical point is not that they BELIEVED this. They ASSUMED this. It was not faith. It was their reality.

So to a Christian, the idea that you should torture yourself and be sterile to be a Holy Man is routine. But you cannot actually KILL yourself, which would be a lot kinder.

It never even occurs to us to question this. The whole pro-life movement is based on that idea, and liberals do not question it.

This idea that sterility and self-torture is not suicide is so ingrained in our society that no liberal could question it.

Gautama Buddha introduced the concept that one should sit under banyan tree and be sterile. In fact, monasticism is a major problem in Buddhist Tibet because so many men choose to live out of hteir begging bowls and be monks that it was the only place in Asia where the problem was a population BUST, not overpopulation.

Guatama Buddha was part of the movement which rid India of its white population. The caste system is called naryu in Sanskit and naryu means “color.”

In fact, the caste system was the reason that Gautama Buddha, whose family had been in India for over a thousand years, had eyes the color of a lotus, dark blue.

But Buddha was a Wordist. He said that all that mattered were his words. He was not the cause of the end of the white race in India, but he was an integral part of the generations that caused it.

Just two thousand years ago the ruling class of India was very white indeed. That is where we got our “Arabic” numerals. That is where China got its aquatic rice.

But the problem is that Aryans do love suicide. In the cases of Christianity and Buddhism, sterility is the ideal.

Most people think that the idea that a white person being anti-white is the height of idealism is something new.

No, there is nothing new about this idea. Christianity and Buddhism simply made suicide a non-violent matter. They teach that one should CHOOSE genetic suicide to achieve glory in the next world.

The Christian-Buddhist solution to The Suicide Problem was to say, “No, THIS life is not worth living, but there is ANOTHER life.”

But the Christian-Buddhist solution also advocates that one concentrate only on that next life and that the body should die without issue in this one.

And that is the thinking that our whole ideal of white racial suicide as the ideal is based on.

It has absolutely nothing to do with Christ.

That whole mind-set can be explained, but so can schizoid paranoia.

The point of explaining it is to cure it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Heat Hypnosis

I assume that when civil rights leaders get to Hell their first concern is about the seating arrangements.

When they are talking about getting on Southern city bus the way Rosa Parks did in 1955, the first thing they would notice would be that blacks sat in back and whites sat in front.

Actually what you would notice is that you noticed very little in the bus. Inside the bus was hotter than outside the bus, and it was HOT outside. The way we coped with that was by going into various states of hypnosis.

We spent the summer in a daze. The extreme heat weighed on us and made us semiconscious. There was no relief.

When we went inside a house there was an exhaust fan going and we were out of the sun and we were covered with sweat. It felt cool.

But I have tried that when the air conditioner goes off in recent years, and it is NOT cool.

Waiting for the bus you just stood or sat there, wrapped in your hypnosis. But what I also remember is that, when I got on the bus, it felt like suddenly walkinginto a wool blanket. Those tin cans absorbed all the sun’s heat and you were sitting in them.

I always thought I loved to swim. We used to go to a pond to swim every day in the summer. But when I moved into air-conditioned highrises that had swimming pools, I never went there.

Swimming was the only relief there was from the heat, day and night.

One problem other old Southerners will remember was getting in the car after swimming. Back then the seats were covered in plastic, plastic that had been directly in the sunlight during the cople of hours you were in the pond. As we came back to the car we always forgot that, though we were wet and cool, the world was still very hot.

“OUCH!” We almost invariably, every day, sat down on the auto seat without remembering, and we got burned. Our backs were actually red from the half second it took us to lean back against them in our bathing suits with our backs uncovered and jumping up.

Another thing I had reason to remember later had to do with being on the streets in South America. The buses down there used the same unleaded gasoline we used in the 1950s. When you are walking along and a bus goes by the smell is, well, distinctive. In fact, you get a semi-high from the gasoline, the kind that gasonline-smellers get.

That is another addiction a lot of people get hooked on and finally die of, smelling gasoline.

But we didn’t notice it because we were used to hypnosis.

And there is also cold hypnosis.

Our drugged-out generation may spend more time conscious than anyone before.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Rosa Parks

Rosa Parks recently died.

She was the black woman who refused to go to the back of the bus in the summer of, I think, 1955 which began the bus boycott that rocketed Martin Luther King to fame, a Nobel Prize, and sainthood in our established religion of Political Correctness.

The reason she was chosen to do this was because of another Southern prejudice. If a man had done that the bus driver or the police would have tossed him off the bus. But Southerners would not physically assault a woman.

As I say, I have seen women beaten by the police when marching against busing. But in the South, Rosa knew she could count on our prejudice against that sort of thing.

We are shamefully backward.

As civil rights leaders kept saying, “If you’re dealing with Southerners, don’t count on their morality, count on their courtesty.”

A very practical left-handed compliment you will not see quoted today.

In fact the integrationist group, The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), had as its symbol a CONFEDERATE flag with a black and a white hand shaking each other under it.

This leads to something else that is not mentioned about Rosa Parks. When the Confederate flag controversy got under way about 1990, she supported the Confederate flag at first. I assume she backed down after she was informed that it offended her.

As the SNCC symbol ahows, the Confederate flag wasw not looked on as a symbol of hate OR tradition.

IT was not seen as a POLITICAL symbol, but as a GEOGRAPHICAL symbol.

So SNCC’s Confederate flag specified that it was fighting for integration in the South. I doubt seriously whether anybody thought they were advocating a return to slavery.

When forty thousand robed Klansmen marched in their robes down the street of Washington, DC in 1927 almost every one of them had a flag in his hands. None of them were Confederate flags. They were each the flag of the United States of America.

To Rosa Parks, who was born, raised and died in Alabama, the Confederate flag was the symbol you used to show you were from the South or IN the South. She remembered the 1927 Klan march, but it never occurred to her that the American flag was a Klan symbol.

They had to tell her that she was offended by the Confederate flag.

Francis Scott Key, who wrote “The Star Spangled Banner” definitely saw the American flag as a White ONLY flag. He wanted blacks sent “back” to Africa. He wanted the Indians shoved out of the way.

Rosa Parks did not think of that when she stood for “The Star Spangled Banner.” It never occurred to her.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

Sexual Obsession

If I could leave one intellectual concept behind, it would be this:

Look at the things that are so obvious that we never even notice them.

One of these is the fact that all the people who criticize white people do it on computers or the printing press — the real ones white people made revolutions out of, not the one the Chinese used to make playing cards with. Whites are attacked for not giving others enough of the goods and services and health and standards of living no non-white society ever even dreamed of.

No one can talk about this.

I come up with a lot of these, but I keep realizing I have not exhausted the list.

I myself saw one of these too-obvious assumptions just this year, and I am very happy about it.

For a man in his sixty-fifth year whose chief joy in life is thinking out the implications of the over-obvious, this is just plain fun. It is breath of fresh air.

By now trying to get people interested in the implications of the over-obvious has become a bit tiresome.

They just don’t get it.

So a new idea to chew on is very welcome.

One of the more disgusting things I have run into has been the attempt to make Jesus a homosexual.

Only this year did I realize that every church takes it for granted that Jesus had another, less disgusting but just as unnatural, attitude toward sex: he was asexual.

This is the subtext in every denomination I know about.

One thing CS Lewis taught me was that an obsession is an obsession. Our usual picture of the Deadly Sin of Gluttony is someone who eats too much. Lewis pointed out that gluttony has nothing to do with how much you eat. Gluttony is an obseesion with one’s stomach.

A person whose religion consists largely of dietary laws is a glutton. A person who goes to a family supper and says there’s too much food there is a glutton. The example Lewish gave was an old lady who sent an overworked waitress back to the kitchen with everything she had brought and insised on just a piece of toast, not overcooked and no unvercooke, but JUST RIGHT.

The piece of dry toast, which was all she wanted in her modesty, was sent back again and again without any regard for the trouble she was causing for others.

That is gluttony.

It seems to me that Satan couldn’t care less whether your obsession with sex is in always thinking about it or having it or whether your obsession was with chastity. It was St. Paul, who had been a Manichaean and therefore against ALL sex, who inserted the obsession with chastity into the dogma of every church.

When Jesus said one should not THINK about adultery, he was not saying he had never thought about sex at all.

But we assume that Jesus never gave any thought to it at all.

Even the Old Testament Jehovist Christians assume this. But there is not a hint of any obsession with chastity in the OT:

“It is better to put your seed into the belly of a whore than to spill it on the ground.”

When peiople talk about Jesus’s temptation in the desert, where he spent forty days, no one ever insists that he was never thirsty. In fact, the whole point of the story is that he WAS thirsty. He WAS hungry, he WAS tempted.

Not so with sex. You have to insist that Jesus had no sexual feelings at all.

I took that so much for granted that it took me over sixty-four years to realize how ODD this idea is.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments