Archive for December 21st, 2005

Derek

Derek says,

“Bob –

“I had another thought. This is a little unrelated to the post, but wanted to share it anyway.”

“The message we are attempting to spread is ‘wordism’ to someone else i.e. blacks or jews. Just like all politics can be reduced to one amobea trying to be the top one, all races are trying to assert themselves as the head honcho. But it seems that only one race is the subject of EVERYBODYS anguish.”

“Ours.”

“Ours was the one that produced the most. That established the best. That conquered virtually all. So it seems to me that we should be prominent as we have done so much already.

“So then, IN MY OPINION, you have to believe that what you want for your own people is right and the only truth their is. It requires faith. ”

“Faith seems hard to come by in the world of politics. ”

Faith?

In POLITICS?

You ARE young, aren’t you?

Here is the thinking you led me into:

The problem whites really face is exactly the one Jews CLAIM they face. Jews will tell you that the reason everyone hates them is because of their virtues.

They say they are hated because everyody feels inferior to them.

When Kissinger said, “Any people that has been persecuted for two thousand years is doing something WRONG” he violated the fundamental doctrine of self-pity which is all that is left of modern Jewish religion.

Judaism has degenerated into self-pity. Christianity has degenerated into self -hatred.

Jews desperately need self-ctriticism. White gentiles desperately need to stop hating themselves.

This is not brain surgery. A people that has been given a license to pity themselves to the point any rational person would laugh at them is going to go overboard.

That is license Jews got in 1945. From the same source and the same time, white gentiles were given orders to blame everything on themselves. Naturally, just as the Jews did, they turned it into a sickness.

This leads me directly back to your comments:

“So then, IN MY OPINION, you have to believe that what you want for your own people is right and the only truth their is. It requires faith. ”

Yes, you could call it faith. But it might be easier to explain it this way:

The only race that is not absolutely convinced of white supremacy is the white race. If Derek had the same mind-set as any black or Chinese, it would never even occur to him that it should occur to him that whites are superior.

Let me illustrate this with a typical Whitaker point, meaning a point that is so obvious no one even considers it. It is this:

“How often do Orientals or blacks think of each other?”

You can read an entire issue of Black News or a Chinese newspaper and never see a word written by blacks about Orientals or a word written by Orientals.

This is so routine you don’t even NOTICE it.

For non-whites, there is only one race on the Planet Earth: whites.

To go to Mark’s point, we need to make this part of our world picture. We must convince non-whites that we have a right to survival and a lot to offer.

And the fact is that other races take it for granted that we are MORALLY superior to them. Once again, this is so obvious no one notices it.

The very idea that any other race would worry about OUR survival is assumed, by EVERYBODY, to be a joke. The very idea that we would ignore a threat to any other race’s EXISTENCE is unthinkable.

Back to Bob’s Mantra:

” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

NOW, what if I DID say, “There was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”

Does ANYONE doubt that the first people to give me hell would not be black, they would be WHITE?

No one, anywhere on this planet, has the slightest doubt that whites would leap to the defense of the right to exist to exist.

Even Bob, who wrote Bob’s Mantra, has the slightest hope that any OTHER race will address itself to genocide against whites.

We all assume that whites are CAPABLE of this. We want whites to repeat it and INSIST on it. But it would never occur to any of us that any NON-WHITE would feel MORALLY obligated to take white survival seriously.

Only whites do that for other races. Once again, this assumption if so total, so obvious, that we do not even SEE it.

Whites do not have to prove anything. we do not need to have faith in anything.

Our real problem is that everyone, including whites, assume our supremacy, both moral and creative, to the point that our very existence is threatened.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

I Get Fini Back

In the last article I explained how Antonio Fini had raised my obseervations on respectable conervatives to the level of theoretical awareness.

I am now going to do the same for him

In his second comment, Antonio says,

“To expand on my point Bob, the Austrian liberals are loudly condeming Govenor Schwarteneggar for signing off on the execution of Black mass muderer Tookie Williams. They even want to name an Austrian football stadium after Tookie, to embarass Arnold.”

“Now the Austrians I know are a pretty lawful, even obedient bunch of people. They won’t cross against a red light on an empty street at 2am. ”

“So what would Austrian liberals do if a white man walked into a store and shotgunned an entire family of Chinamen? Probably revive the death penalty for him. But a Black mass murderer is said to be “Most admirably rehabilitated” when he refrains from knifing any corrections officers. Why?”

“Because liberals expect Blacks to commit senseless acts of violence and Whites to obey the law. Liberals are racist to the core.”

Conservatives on the other hand know that if only Tookie had read Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises he could have developed into a brilliant capitalist entrepeneur. It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man.”

“We need to expose liberal racial hypocracy to conservatives. They already know about liberal economic hypocrisy.”

By pointing out how OBEDIENT Austrians are, you have answered your own question.

If Europeans ever realized how OBEDIENT they are, it would embarrass many of them into rebelliousness.

You ask some very logical questions. But you are dealing with a continent which for over a millenium fed the poor when told to and burned people alive when told to.

Many of those who were burned alive were exactly the people who pointed out that this was a contradiction. Today those are being imprioned are the ones who ask exactly the kind od questions you are asking.

Remember that we are dealing with an established RELIGION today, Political Correctness. Europe’s reaction today does not vary by one molecule from its blind obedience of the old established religion.

You asked why an obedient people could not be logical. You have answered your own question. Sitting at a stuck red light at 2 am is not logical. It is obedient.

The most ironic aspect of this is that Austrians think they are being rebellious in attacking Schwartzeneger. They think they are being independent-minded.

Why? Because they are TOLD that what they are doing they have been ordered to do because it represented independent, radical thought.

Karl Marx died in 1883. In his name, Joseph Stalin, Mao-Tes Tung and Pol Pot ran the most totally reactionary regimes in human history, including the cavemen. Those regimes DIED of terminal inability to deal with ANYTHING modern.

But to this day a follower of Karl Marx is still referred to in Europe as a “radical.”

Why? Because Europeans have been TOLD that a “radical” is a follower of a man who was out of date when he died in 1883. An opponent of that particular corpse is officially a “right winger,” one who advocates YESTERDAY’S ideas.

To me, as a free-born American, this is hilarious. To Europeans it is, quite literally, Gospel.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Comments

Antonio Gives us Two Good Ones

No matter how badly I feel about what I said before, I NEVER try to make up for it by giving false praise.

Antonio, unfazed by my attacks, gave us two great additions to our seminar before I even apologized.

Let me quote them and then explain why they are on target:

]
Antonio Fini Bob I’ve been thinking about your comment to my comment and I’ve yet to think of a magic bullet solution what I’m going to start doing is hammering on the racism of liberals.

My observation about conservatives is they spend their lives secretly wondering when blacks and browns are going to undergo a flash of inspiration and realize that America is a great country, Ronald Regan was a great President and the welfare/ affirmitave action state is destructive and wrong. In other words they believe every intelligent black man has a level headed, white, middle class conservative inside of him struggling to get out.

Same thing with jews.

Liberals on the other hand suffer no such delusions. They know negros are hopeless, and homosexuals are incurrably sick. But it makes them feel good to give away other peoples money and rights to help the underclass.

I mean to keep pounding away on my liberal friends that they don’t really believe in equality. They believe in White Man’s Burden and the eternal misery and hopelessness of non-whites. Also the vengeful ruthlessness of jews. The last thing they want is for blacks and browns to become answerable for their own problems, like adult human beings.

What I mean to hammer home to conservatives is that the liberals are exactly right in their racist assesment of non-whites. It’s O-k to have racist feelings because Hillary and Oprah and Rosie O’Donnell have the exact same feelings. They’re just willing to exploit other people’s misery to demonstrate their holiness to the world.

Antonio Fini

To expand on my point Bob, the Austrian liberals are loudly condeming Govenor Schwarteneggar for signing off on the execution of Black mass muderer Tookie Williams. They even want to name an Austrian football stadium after Tookie, to embarass Arnold.

Now the Austrians I know are a pretty lawful, even obedient bunch of people. They won’t cross against a red light on an empty street at 2am.

So what would Austrian liberals do if a white man walked into a store and shotgunned an entire family of Chinamen? Probably revive the death penalty for him. But a Black mass murderer is said to be “Most admirably rehabilitated” when he refrains from knifing any corrections officers. Why?

Because liberals expect Blacks to commit senseless acts of violence and Whites to obey the law. Liberals are racist to the core.

Conservatives on the other hand know that if only Tookie had read Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises he could have developed into a brilliant capitalist entrepeneur. It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man.

We need to expose liberal racial hypocracy to conservatives. They already know about liberal economic hypocracy.

Antonio, the only magic bullet there is is the kind of hard thought you have given here.

Notice how Antonio’s discussion is TARGETED. It outlines a different approach of each of a group of our enemies. It doesn’t mk ake the whole problem the Jews or the Communists or any other single group of evil geniuses.

Respectable conservatives are masters of self-deception. They are MASTERS of Goodthink. That is the only way to stay respectable and never see anything liberals do not want you to see.

But I did not go the next step Antonio has here. Respectable cosnervatives may be the only people on earth, including blacks, who BELIEVE that blacks are innately equal to whites.

As Fini says, “In other words (respectable cosnervatives) believe every intelligent black man has a level headed, white, middle class conservative inside of him struggling to get out.”

Brilliant. What is funny is that I have OBSERVED this for decades as a conservative attitude, but I have never rbought it right out the way Antonio does. I knowe now that the strange feelig I had in dealing with conservatives was that they BELIEVED this crap.

Now this is what a seminar is all about. Somebody else analyses what a grizzled old veteran has seen and seen nd puzzled about but never really understood. Working all alone leaves you in a lot os intellectual blind alleys like that.

Fini finishes is thought in the second comment brilliantly,

“It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man.”

I very nearly stood up and cheered. If you read National Review, you see that all the time. I have a free lifetime subscription to NR and have seen that over and over.

But, as Sherlock Holmes kept telling Doctor Watson, I have SEEN it, but I have not previously OBSERVED it.

The technical term for this, by the way, is, “Bringing an idea to the level of theoretical awareness.”

It is one of the basic functions of a seminar.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Mark and War

I will get off my self-flagelaton for time to address the point Mark made me think of.

What ever happened to DECLARING war?

As Mark pointed out, we have repeatedly killed off tens of thousands of our young men, time after time, since 1941 and not even THOUGHT of declaring it a WAR.

This phenomenon is not at all limited to the United States. I vividly remember the one time I totally took Israel’s side against the Arabs.

Ignoring the complications, which are fascinating to someone interested in international and a bore to anybody else, all of hte Arab states except Lebanon declared war against Isreal in 1948.

When I went into Israel, just as when I went into Rhodesia, I would get my visa stamped on a separate peice of cardboard, not in my passport. The reason for this was that if yo had a Rhodesian visa in your passport you could not get into black-ruled countries.

By the same token, a passport with an Israeli visa meant you could not get into the Arab countries who were officially at war with Israel.

Then around 1980 Israel conducted a sneak attack and bombed out Iraq’s nuclear power plant because it might make them capable of obtaining nuclear weapons.

I was in a peculiar position. I was certainly no friend of Israel, and I had no interest in whether they were right or not in attacking the plant.

No, my problem was entirely different.

I DESPISE the guy in the bar who acts like he is about to fight someone but waits until there are people to grab his arms and shouts, “Lemme at him! Lemme at him!”

He is a coward posing as a real fighter.

Iraq had an official state of war declared between itself and Israel. So when Israel bombed Iraq, Iraq went whining and crying to the United Nations.

When you have a state of war declared against another country, you have given that country the right to bomb the hell out of you. That’s what a state of war IS.

I have championed the Arabs a long time, and it was EMBARRASSING to me to see a coutry that had been beating its chest and yelling how rough and tough it was and how it would fight to the death against Zionism go squealing to the UN when Israel took them up on it.

Which reminds me. Did Iran and Iraq DECLARE war on eaxh other? There were over a million deaths in that conflict, but i honestly don’t know whether war was ever formally declared.

In the Falkland Islands War (sic) there was an actual naval conflict going on and neither side ever even considered declaring war and nobody expected them to.

What has happened to declarations of war and why?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Giving Bob a Break

In one of my more rational moments, I gave Antonio some good advice a few days ago. I said that the one person who have to have a good opinion of yourself.

I have also said that if you follow the Golden Rule, you cannot treat yourself like a dog. If youare to do unto unto others as you would have them do unto you, you can’t kick yourself unmercifully.

Last night was not my first, or even my hundredth, incident of hitting everyone around me inexcusably. I have never been unforgiving when someone did that to me since I reached the age of twenty.

But giving YOURSELF a break is very hard.

I remember reading a comment froma German who said, “If we criticised others the way we criticize ourselves we would be sadists.”

The whole history of Christianity has been darkened by people who forgave others but subjected themselves to whippings and starvation and deprivation far worse than the naked and hungry Jesus said we should help.

But it is STILL hard to forgive yourself. That makes me jealous of psychopaths.

Every reader here knows exactly what I am talking about. It must be wonderful to be a psychpath who has never given himself a moment’s discomfort about the worst thing he did to somebody else.

In my attempts at self-justification, I try to tell myself that I am like a shotgun aimed at the enemy. I get out there and fight them nose-to-nose, but the people aiming me have to get used to the fact that they have to absorb the kick of the weapon they are using.

It is a hell of a lot better to be taking the kick than being on the business end of a shotgun, but the kick is stillnot pleasant. When you send someone out to say the unsayable and fight alone, you can’t expect him to come back as a totally nice guy.

So there are two parts to this process. I must apologize to you and not hate myself.

Antoni’s example here is a good one. His fury is directed at the man who concenrated so hard on forgiving Hispanics that he totally ignored his duty to stand up for himself and his OWN people.

But if we go back to the millions of Christians who turned the Golden Rule into “Be nice to everybody else but vicious to yourself” we see this is not exactly a new problem.

I want Shari to explicitly accept my apology. I want that from the rest of you, too. But at the same time everything I write here strikes me as a rather weak excuse.

The fact is that if I am to expect you to accept my apology I am going to have accept my own as well.

As the German guy said, it is a hell of a lot easier to give someone else who is sincerely sorry your forgiveness than it is to give it to yourself.

A conscience is a wonderful thing, but it is certainly NOT the key to happiness.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments