Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

mpelding

Posted by Bob on August 5th, 2006 under Comment Responses


As I mentioned below, from time to time some disgusted commenter will say Bob’s Blog is just for agreeing with Bob and telling me how right and how great I am.

As I said, if thats is purpose of this Blog, I am plagued by commenterts who simply refuse to get with the program. The latest is mpelding:

NOT SPAM

All right, you do homage to some ancestors who
truly understood Jesus, in your opinion.
What about earlier ancestors, the ones who would
be BURNED ALIVE by their own racial kin if they refused
Christianity or failed to follow it?
Oh, I know, those were “wordists”.
Maybe you and a few others can remove Christ
contextually from the rest of the bible.
Save the “red letters” in the four Gospels
and toss the rest.
Where do you think liberalism comes from?
What preceeds it?
How about the righteousness of the Beatitudes?
Just like a moralizing liberal today.
So a Christian and a liberal get in an argument.
The liberal quotes Jesus.
The Christian rebuts by quoting either
an epistle of Saul of Tarsus, a Pharisee,
or the Old Testement, the Sanhedrin.
The Liberal assumes the viewpoint of Jesus.
The Christians assumes the viewpoint of his enemies.

Political correctness is materialistic Christianity.
Or simpler put, political Christianity.
If the world differs from what Christ envisioned,
use political force change it.
Allways the same, making right and wrong based on
abstractions instead of Blood and Soil.
A millenia of racial self destruction,
based on the words of a Jewish carpenter.
“The meek shall inherit the earth”.
Our racial enemies don’t strike me as being too
“meek”.
And they are inheriting the earth.
Quickly, I might add.
Oh no, see Jesus was talking about his fathers
kingdom. Not on the earth in the here and now.
See, there’s this special abstract place where
all TRUE believers will go. That’s the place
that Jesus is talking about.
I’d rather exist in a Valhalla full of my warrior
ancestors than in somekind of erternal heavenly
Vulcan “mind meld” with every savage that accepted
Jesus as his/her personal savior.

Comment by mderpelding —

MY REPLY:

As an expression of meek, mindless agreement agreement, this falls considerably short of perfection. That suits both mepelding and Ole Bob perfectly.

My reply to

“The meek shall inherit the earth”

has always been,

“That’s sure as hell the only way they’re going to get it.”

More than any other writer I know of, I have talked about my ancestors who were burned alive in the name of “Christianity.” I have repeated, ad nauseum, the point that while Jews whine and sob about how badly THEY were treated, the simple fact is that THEY, and THEY alone, were allowed to stay ALIVE and defy “Christianity.”

Jesus never advocated any of this. What we call Christianity is a complete perversion of everything Christ actually said.

Every word mpelding says in his usual short, uncompromising, take-it-or-leave-it sentences is correct.

But let me say it again, ad nauseum magna, that you are not dealing with Objective Truth here. You are dealing with Bob. It is not objective truth but Bob Whitaker the Bible elter who has a soft spot in his heart for Jesus. I am leveling with you.

I am not trying to impress you. I am just one more confused human being.

Enough with the humility! To quote underpelding again, “Victimization does not become you.” He really does need to work on the mindless worship bit.

What mderpelding was talking about with that last quote was my admission that I have a hell of time iwth all this complicated computer business. Al Parker’s excellent suggestion simply involved an assumption that I can handle computers better than I can. So I told him the truth and asked for some help.

That happens to be the truth. If it sounds like I am humilating myself, so be it. I don’t consider this kind of admission to be humiliation. I consider it management, on which I made my living. Management is not victimization, but it IS dependence.

mderpelding is probably right. Jesus was a Wordist, and even if he did have some solid truths to impart, they havebeen so perverted by now that anything decent he said is beyond retrieval by now.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by joe rorke on 08/05/2006 - 4:44 pm

    I think mderpelding’s got you buffaloed, Bob. Must be a professor. Check that piece out a little bit and you’ll find a little crap floating around in there. But he buffaloed you with pieces of crap. “Materialistic Christianity.” Right. It’s kind of funny to see you folding under all this verbal pummeling, Bob. But it’s still your basic professorial crap. You should be able to deal with that. You wrote a book on professorial crapshooters, didn’t you?

  2. #2 by mderpelding on 08/06/2006 - 1:18 am

    NOT SPAM
    I am a P*** poor syncophant.
    I can express ideas but not feelings.
    I respect your intellect.
    I have read your writings.
    “the proof is in the pudding”.
    My apologies if I seemed condenscending.

  3. #3 by mderpelding on 08/06/2006 - 1:48 am

    NOT SPAM

    It took a bit, but I think I
    got a lesson here.
    “christ was probably a wordist”.
    I’m trying to lead you down a path
    and you are standing at the end to
    greet me.
    I have no great statement of wisdom
    to conclude this.
    But I learned something.
    Thank you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.