The piece below may give you the idea that the rural South is a very dangerous place. We were armed to the teeth and people pulled guns. On the other hand, you are well aware that people were very, very safe there. All the bullies and thugs who terrorize “civilized” places today kept their heads down.

Gun control is absurd, and even those who desperately desire it know it is.

The reaction to any terrorist attack is to disarm the public even more. The reaction to terrorism is to make more things Top Secret.

On thing I learned from the get-go as one with tippy-top secret clearance was that 99% of Top Secret destroyed national security. People like me who will NEVER talk specifically about what they did and when they did it do not plead Top Secret. What we did isn’t IN the files. If you are at the level I was at, you clean your own files as a matter of course.

So what IS Top Secret used for? The national security industry uses Top Secret for the same reason ANY bureaucracy uses ANYTHING: to hide their own screwups.

What I SAW was that Top Secret kept people from finding out about the Ivy League traitors who run intelligence. Anything in the files that the COMMUNISTS wanted to know was theirs, because of those traitors. I told you about the openly leftist, Ivy-League Cuban woman who was head of the Cuba Desk for the Top Secret Defense Intelligence Agency. She is now in prison for many years for being from the beginning, as any sane person would have guessed, an agent for Castro.

I am willing to bet that more than one loyal memberof the inteligence bureaucracy — they DO exist — ruined his or her career by pointing her out. Her final capture is a truimph of defiance of Political Correctness at huge personal costs. And any evidence against her her superiors protected her with — guess what? — Top Secret.

So when it comes to terror, the Bush Administration bans take-on Coca-Colas, strip-searches grandmothers. In short, they do what the terrorists would like to do: make sure that everybody on a plane except the terrorists is HELPLESS.

What would happen if anyone who had a concealed weapons permit were allowed to go on a flight with a gun?

A coincealed weapons permit involves a complete background check and a course. The record of several hundred thousand concealed weapons permit holders over more than a decade is almost inhumanly perfect. If any of htem used their guns incorrectly I will guarantee you it would be headline news.

We are talking about MILLIONS of permit years. And the media has had NOTHING to report!

I have been for those EARNED permits instead of hte old POLITICAL permits from the beginning, but even I am absultely amazed at how so many people could carry so many guns and NOTHING has happened!

So what if a permit holder — or a pilot — were routinely allowed to have a gun on a plane?

Do you think terrorists would LIKE that?

More Top Secret. More gun control.

More terror.

NOT SPAM

Bob, what do you think about this article? Is it overblown?

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=644

Comment by Al Parker

MY OBSERVATIONS:

I put off answering this worthwhile note because ***I*** have to summarize what the article is about. Al should have put in a sentence or two to save the old man work.

SO, the article is about when Dr. Duke (“Former Klansman,” not “Doctor,” of course) stood up at the last American Rennaissance convention and denounced what he saw as the Jewish Dr. Hart’s “neocon” agenda.

Instead of arguing his point, Dr. Hart stomped out. As you very well know, I would tell him what I would have told any of you: You have to learn to take it as well as dish it out.

Dr, Hart is still using the old tried and true Jewish tactic of substituting being highly offended for standing your ground and ANSWERING criticism. I don’t respect that in us, I don’t respect that in Jews or anybody else.

We have a LOT of disagreemnts, we are NOT brought to our knees by somebody taking offense, and we are DIFFERENT groups with DIFFERENT agenda.

The reason Dr. Duke and others of us were at that conference was because of Katrina. We WOULD have been at the New Orleans Conference, but we all decided to support the AR conference since we couldn’t meet there that year.

Mainline media are not used to anybody standing up at a meeting and saying something out-of-the-way the way Dr. Duke did. Politically Correct meetings, which is all they’re used to, are smooth and it never occurs to anybody to disagree with their programming.

So the writer could not tell that we have several movements, each independent. Like all bigots, our enemies think all us pro-whites, i.e., naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews, look alike. It’s the old “all them Chinamen look alike” bit, updated to today’s antis.

In other words, the article is just a little bit slanted.

So when we had the inevitable shouting fest, the writer naturally thought the whole movement was breaking up.

As I said, I talked to Dr. Hart and his wife on a very friendly basis for an hour before and an hour after that meeting, which I did not attend, occurred. I have talked about that below. They did not mention Dr. Duke at all and the talks were very friendly.

I told them what I tell ALL Jews: There were more Holocausts than the one Mrs. Hart kept emphasizing, and if Jews want to save themselves, they will have to get on board with preserving US.

I first heard about the incident from Dr. Duke himself. He had just come out, sat down with me, and he was VERY upset with himself. He had offended his friends.

Well, while I keep criticizing our people for their obsession with Jews, I was not at all upset with Dr. Duke for speaking his mind. In fact, than HE was ipset with himself. I wasn’t

To me, we do NOT all look alike. A very large part of the conference was made up of people like me and David and many others who constitute a DIFFERENT group. The reason Dr. Duke and others were there and made this conference a special success was because we could not have our New Orleans conference because of Katrina.

THAT was the IMPORTANT news, but nobody seems to notice it but me.

I remember a LOT of things that can be useful today. One of them is that not that long ago, a group like our New Orleans crowd would rather have been at an NAACP meeting than go to a rival pro-white conference.

Ask Willis or any of the rest of us Old Soldiers.

THAT was the big news, if you have been in this fight a long time.

This was a MAJOR triumph for me when so many of the New Orleans group agreed to go support AR. We had ONE confrontation that resulted from our being TWO groups.

Not only do we all look alike to the Politically Correct bigots, but they are not used to real movements. They have attended many Politically Correct meetings and this kind of dispute is absolutely alien to them. They are used to meetings where everybody follows their programming. So this looked like a major split to them.

I am AMAZED that this was the ONLY major dispute that broke out.

I am going to be VERY worried about us if everything goes TOO smoothly. I don’t want to defeat Political Correctness and end up in ANOTHER crowd of mindless sheep.

My attitude that WE were there supporting THEM, and if Dr. Duke had a bone to pick and somebody couldn’t take it, there is no reason for one of our recognized leaders to keep his mouth shut.

David was VERY upset with himself. He offended his friends.

But I do not have the same motivation. Jared Taylor is a comrade, but he is not really my friend. Nor are any of the other guys mentioned in the article except David. This is NOT ideological, it is purely personal. If any of those comrades called on me for help they would get it posthaste.

But an ally is not a comrade and a comrade is not necessarily a friend. Jared and I don’t LIKE each other personally, but that is 100% personal. He is a suburbanite and I am a country type, aka, redneck.

Saint Peter and Saint Paul didn’t much like each other either. But from what I can see, their movement was pretty successful anyway.

So the dispute didn’t hurt me PERSONALLY the way it did David. It’s a lot easier to be objective when YOU don’t have a dog in the fight.