NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
For once you have almost silenced me!
I break my silence nearly only to thank you for insights expressed.
But i have a question?
If i started “something”.
And you could see that it would lead to the death of both of us, premature before we die of cancer or senility.
But you could also see for sure that we will be effective to bring about what YOU/We believe in.
Would you join me in death?
PGB
Comment by PeterGene Budarick
MY OBSERVATION:
Yes, this is a very strange question. But if you can’t ask a strange question in Bob’s Blog, you can’t ask it anywhere.
Budarick, if you are asking me whether I would suffer and die for my people, I think my record makes the answer abundantly clear.
This brings on an OBSERVATION. I have FINISHED adressing Budarick personally.
Please note the above sentence carefully.
The reason I presume to be LEADER of this seminar is because I feel I have attitudes you do NOT have. I hope you feel mine are worth having, or I would have nowhere to LEAD you.
And please don’t point out that my attitudes are flawless. I feel I am BETTER at them than you are, that’s all. I amnot TEACHING, I am LEADING.
I use caps a lot, and I use them for a reason.
Now to a specific attitude that causes me a lot of trouble. When I write here I am thinkig out loud. Most of the time, since my commenters are damned good, you lead me into areas which wander totally away from commenting on YOUR statement or YOUR attitudes and go off into how they remind me of people with OTHER attitudes who said something similar.
Often those other people are real stinkers. You then hit me with complaints about how I had misinterpreted you, which forces me to go back through the whole thing, with explanations. PLEASE don’t do that to me!
If a person goes to the trouble of attending a seminar, he has a certain respect for the attitude of the seminar leader towards himself or herself. But I am not thinking about YOU. You made me think of something ELSE.
I cannot imagine how anybody who reads Bob’s stuff could imagine that if I am criticizing YOU, YOU will know it up front. I do that here, a lot, and I expect you to come back when I do.
But very few of my comments replies deal only with the comment. That is why they are now called MY OBSERVATIONS. If I have a comment only for you, I put it in the comments with yours. Again, I am not perfect about this, and you can correct me when I do it wrong.
I encourage YOUR comments because they make me think of something the whole seminar should hear. That is a compliment, gang. Evem when I give you hell in the BODY of the blog, it is because yours is a comment worth hearing and dealing with head-on. If I think you are in error, it is an important error that is not unique to you, or it wouldn’t be HERE.
I do not waste blog space making one person look foolish, despite what a few people have suggested from time to time.
I jump on Joe more than anybody else, and he jumps on me. But if you get the impression I am particularly interested in Joe personally, you couldn’t be wronger. This is a fight between two experienced old fighters, and it is worth your listening in on. Otherwise I would answer Joe only in the blog.
So. please, look at my meanderings carefully and object more about what is said and less about how I am treating YOU.
I will treat you like hell, as usual, but you’re used to that.
And when I do, there will be nothing subtle or subtextual about it.
#1 by PeterGene Budarick on 08/14/2006 - 9:36 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob wrote:
“Budarick, if you are asking me whether I would suffer and die for my people, I think my record makes the answer abundantly clear.
This brings on an OBSERVATION. I have FINISHED adressing Budarick personally.
Please note the above sentence carefully.
The reason I presume to be LEADER of this seminar is because I feel I have attitudes you do NOT have. I hope you feel mine are worth having, or I would have nowhere to LEAD you.”
No Bob i was not actually asking you that.”
I was asking the question of myself and not of Bob.
“Record”? I have no doubt.
“Suffering”? shit, we both know about that and what it leads to.
You don’t have to defend yourself like that Bob.
But it is noted that you did say “IF”.
The answer to “IF” is NO.
I wanted to relate to you how i came to ask the strange question.
Actually it is not so strange.
As you will soon find out as the world plunges into
a holocaust without a capital H.
I was reading about Lincoln Rockwell’s life.
Then i read some of his writings – very interesting.
And then i found out how he died and, who did it.
All new to me BTW – Pamila Emmerich told me nothing about him.
Then i did some more study and i had a realization.
I realized i was out of my depth when it comes to Jews!
And apparently also when it comes to Bob sharing his understanding!
But i realized something that very few people know.
The SPECTRUM OF POWER of the Jew.
And i said to myself “you should not messing with THAT”
“Peter, you are an incompetent cowardly little boob”
And then my 85-yo mother get’s stuck into me and said:
“please don’t do anything over the internet”.
“Don’t say anything”!
********
That prompted me to write what i did Bob.
********
OK this IS personal.
You will never be a LEADER Bob.
You are TOO HONEST and TOO DESCENT for that.
That statement ONLY gives you a hint of
my particular interpretation of a “leader”.
Like everything i write it is not intended as an insult.
I would say the best leaders are those who don’t know it, but it just happens.
It is like a child grows up to be a natural musician or mathematician.
Best wishes as always.
budarick