Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Z

Posted by Bob on August 15th, 2007 under Coaching Session


I may be mistaken but what I think Bob is saying is that we should welcome more immigrants? Well, not really “welcome” but realize that they are actually a benefit for us. This acts as a sort of economic price curve. As the supply of non-whites goes up, the tolerance for them goes down. Similar to when prices go up and the demand goes down.

The globalists realize this too. That is why every effort will be made to limit free speech in this country. But, what if this fails them too? What if limiting free speech only forces some of our more radical brethren to tone down their rhetoric? This would remove one of our enemies favorite weapons; using the nutzis as an example of who we are.

After all, look at Europe. Europe’s Nationalist parties are much more influential than us and they actually have police state regulations.

So bottom line, the multicultural empire is destined to fail, we just need to make sure we present a viable alternative when it happens.

So it would seem we would need to figure out what that alternative looks like?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Bret Ludwig on 08/15/2007 - 5:40 pm

    It’s coming down, but we need to have two goals: not getting killed or held incommunicado in the avalanche, and then after the dust settles being there first with the most-the most rational, the most workable plan,that will handle all the major things with the resources we are likely to have.

    WNs won’t have all that much effect on when it comes down. It’s like a shotgun blast starting an avalanche. If it does, the avalanche would have happened sooner or later. But it might be twelve hours later and you’d rather not have it happen when you are vulnerable geographically.

    Europe has less freedom of speech than it had when Hitler ran those sections he did. But people talk anyway. Once the undertow of reality is flowing the non-equalitarian, there-is-such-a-thing-as-race-and-it-matters, way nothing short of a Stalinist regime will keep it from permeating the society-and even that will fail.

    To you and me, that is as obvious as the sun rising and setting. But a century of Boasianism and equalitarianism has been pounded into people’s heads and that can be very stubborn for a long time. But one thing we know about all systems of defiance of reality: they are carefully built, over time, but come down catastrophically.

    When it comes down in a given place, it will happen almost overnight. Friday afternoon will see an office of White race-orthodox workers go home and on Monday almost every one of them will be race-affirming. That Monday you might want to be on vacation: it will be a mess.

  2. #2 by mderpelding on 08/15/2007 - 7:27 pm

    A thought…
    We are used to using the politics of the majority.
    But, really, we’re not anymore. We are an out of power minority.
    Many of us don’t seem to understand this.
    We fought two world wars to make the whole world democratic.
    But “democratic” means “majority rules”.

    Non-whites are the “majority”.
    Not whites.

    As long as your political/tactical view assumes white supremacy, you lose.
    We are not the winners, we are the losers!
    We may still be a numerical majority in our country but we ceased being the political majority fifty plus years ago.

    Tactics based on mainstream political power will fail in the end.
    We shall be as the Kurds.
    And no, that doesn’t mean the end is near.
    It means you will have to think for a change.

  3. #3 by Z on 08/15/2007 - 8:48 pm

    But wait, there’s more.

    According to a Newsweek article, the NY City Police Intelligence Office reports that the biggest threat of terrorism in this country is not from foreign Muslims, but rather from “homegrown” terrorists. NYPD’s Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly says says that “unremarkable” people with “unremarkable” jobs and education make up most of the terrorist plotters. The article then goes on to say:

    “Goaded by the “groupthink” of fellow believers and fed by a constant diet of Internet propaganda, the terrorist candidate comes to believe that his faith demands action.”

    Do you see the word, there it is, INTERNET!!!!

    So what’s this article trying to tell us. First, the INTERNET IS VERY DANGEROUS. Second, we shouldn’t worry about the immigrants sneaking into this country because its the “homegrown” kind you really need to worry about. Last, that these people are for the most part, “Unremarkable,” kind of like another group that the Globalists like to demonize and call terrorists, can you guess where this is going?

    I highly recommend the good folks at this blog read the whole article. Here’s the link.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20285251/site/newsweek/page/0/

  4. #4 by mderpelding on 08/15/2007 - 9:36 pm

    Z…
    You are a great watcher.

    But how do you define yourself?

  5. #5 by Z on 08/16/2007 - 2:00 am

    Define?

  6. #6 by Hardric on 08/16/2007 - 6:02 am

    The 225 year old Experiment in Government in America approaches its end. Even now it stands like the empty shell of a cicada, waiting to be recognized for a lifeless shell.

    Washington and Jefferson to Clinton and Obama? The European Founders of America to our present Multi-Racial Mish Mash? The American Revolution to Iraq?

    It’s getting late. Is the Democracy Charade over yet?

You must be logged in to post a comment.