Archive for August 12th, 2007

The Lynch Mob Forms on the RIGHT

Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 08/12/2007

Hannity of Hannity and Colmes said that “When I see an interracial couple, all I see is two Children of God.” The obvious question is, “If that’s all you saw, how did you know it was an INTERRACIAL couple?” But nobody lies like a “Christian” anti-racist, so why bother?

I understand that when David Duke said he was against interracial marriage, Hannity screamed, “You really ARE a Nazi!”

The guy who writes the last page of National Review complained about the high Moslem birth rate in Europe and the low “Christian” birth rate. He immediately got a huge volume of complaints that he was a racist. He said is Islam is not a RACE.

Let me rush to testify to his innocence. National Review is a New York City Catholic theocratic magazine. Like William Buckley, the new crowd that runs it would be glad to see the stinkiest pygmy marry the most beautiful intelligent tall Nordic blond if a man in a dress said the right words over them.

But it has to be the RIGHT dress and it has to be the RIGHT words. They tell us racism is about superficial things, tribalism and so forth. What’s REALLY important is not the genes of the children, but the dress and the WORDS they demand.

I will go further. Speaking of Europe, Buckley applauded the imprisonment of David Irwin in the only mention NR made of it. Since Joe Sobran was fired, there is not a single member of the NR staff who would not be proud to PRESIDE at the lynching of any “Racist.”

They are pathetically upset that Yale and New York City don’t APPRECIATE that. But in the meantime, they are indispensable to anti-whites by providing any side issue, from immigration to abortion to prayers in schools to more war in Iraq and war on Iran, to keep attention off the little matter of genocide against MY race.

And they are the first to demand that anyone who MENTIONS that genocide be suppressed and punished.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

13 Comments

Yes, It Really IS Like That!

Posted by Bob in History on 08/12/2007

This is from an e-mail I got. Very often I feel funny telling you how screwed up things are among the so-caled professionals.

This all sounds FAMILIAR to me!

Subject: DISORDER IN THE COURTS PLEASE,ATTORNEY & CLIENT

These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.
_______________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
____________________________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, “Where am I, Cathy?”
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!

_______________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.

________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-one-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: Uh, he’s twenty-one.
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you kidding me?

________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Uh…. “What was I doing ???”
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Now whose death do you suppose terminated it?
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Guess.
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people. Would you like to rephrase that?
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
________________________________________________

ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh….are you qualified to ask that question?
________________________________________________

— And the best for last: —
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments