There are non-whites that you can have some respect and sympathy for, and whites that you cannot. But the two things I am TOTALLY against are these. The constant push for white genocide, both sweetly and not so sweetly. And non-whites and governing whites will always prove intolerable.
#1 by Dave on 03/11/2008 - 5:29 pm
Robert Whitaker has the ability to take them all down. The concept of Wordism can get out. Its power is immense. With knowledge of Wordism you can see how all the different tentacles of “motivated” (profit seeking, political control seeking) dereliction relate.
Academia and the professions keep knowledge in a constant state of confusion. This pacifies the whites (even better than Bud, bags of Doritos, and the Superbowl) while the nonwhites don’t care because their allegiance is to nursery rhymes anyway (and a not so secret desire to be white).
Having colored leaders is just another step in the administration of a culture of motivated dereliction. This is the State of Louisiana and New Orleans, which has a harder time of hiding its shame than the State of Nevada and Las Vegas. Regardless of the gambling allusions though, the end game is a society like Communist Cuba where everything is so preposterously silly it is actually considered chic.
Instead of the billboards showing Castro in Havana, they should just be honest: NO CLEAR THINKERS ALLOWED IN CUBA!!! IT GETS IN THE WAY OF OUR DICTATORSHIP AND OUR OWNERSHIP OF YOU, YOUR FAMILY, AND YOUR ENTIRE LIFE!!!
Colored people can get behind slogans like that. So can many whites.
It’s just the way things are.