Shari READS what I write. She remembered that the last shah who ruled Zoroastrian Iran was a mulatto. Zoroastrian religion was limited to Aryans. The original Olympic Oath included the declaration that the athlete was “of pure Hellenic blood.” The original Sanskrit term for caste meant “color.”
Every former Great Civilization which has gone down and STAYED down, just coincidentally, now consists of people with a brown skin. In other words, each collapsed society consists of people the Greeks and the Zoroastrians and all other Indo-Europeans SPECIFICALLY excluded.
The Party Line is now that Indo-Europeans were just a LANGUAGE group.
It don’t wash.
The religion of Political Correctness now has a mulatto president of the United States. Political Correctness, like late Zoroastrianism, developed from an earlier racist outlook.
Universalism turns society brown, as the Mantra says, and brown skin is fatal.
I don’t think the parallel is exact. But it IS interesting.
#1 by Dave on 11/07/2008 - 4:50 am
If you have ever lived in a climate where month long fogs can occur you will know what I mean.
The fog just settles in. And day after day it becomes relentless growing thicker with its misery of bone chilling cold. You begin to learn what it means to have your head held aloft with your hands and feet bound and you cannot see.
That is just what has been happening for past several years in our growing climate of dread, a thickening climate of dread that is now palpable.
I don’t regret that dread wearing the face of mulattos.
Dread leads to ruin. And in ruin your end meets a beginning.
#2 by backbaygrouch4 on 11/07/2008 - 11:42 am
“I don’t think the parallel is exact. But it IS interesting.” With tips like that one could make money at the track.
#3 by Prometheus on 11/07/2008 - 11:05 pm
The northern half of Cyprus was invaded and then subsequently occupied by Turks. The southern half is basically like any other area you would expect to find in Europe. The northern occupied area, which used to be ON PAR, was decrepit, run down. The area occupied by Turks had come to resemble Turkey.
Races regress to some mean. They may have unfortunate circumstances that hold them down, but there is always some level they swing to. Europe was devastated after WWII but recovered.
The whole “Is Eastern Europe ready for immigrants” argument is also a reflection in the expectation that people have of white nations. No one expects an African nation to become a desirable place on its own accord after some disaster, disease or drought. The end of some particular externally inflicted misery does little. However, despite the relatively poor living standards that Eastern Europe experienced during communism, even anti-whites assume that these nations will pick themselves up and march on.
Once Indo-Europeans lived all around the Mediteranean, in Anatolia and further east. The achivements of these people and their civilisation did not stop at the Bosporous but once spread further east. What we call ‘white homelands’ are whats left of a people who have been pushed westwards, divided and assimilated out.
With us, poverty is an exception, with brown and black nations, it’s the norm.
#4 by Dave on 11/08/2008 - 12:11 pm
To understand how dire things can get, look at Brazil. There is a pure blooded blue eyed and blond white race in Brazil, surrounded by oceans of mulattos. Granted it is a small minority, but is does sustain itself. I personally know some of these Brazilians. Their ideology is BUGS, officially unknown and actually known, to the rest of Brazil.
Under mulattoization the value of racial purity appreciates.
The truth is bizarre, really. We have this full press popular culture in ersatz whiteness.
Niggers wearing blond wigs. A plastic surgery industry wholly devoted to sculpting Caucasian features. A huge, literally huge magnification in genetic nuance consciousness.
All within the scope of mullatoization.
This ersatz whiteness is no different than the worldwide industry in counterfeiting high end merchandize and the junk clothing spewed out under the imprimatur of haute couture.
Meanwhile, the genuine article, that real strawberry blond, with a pink and glowing ivory complexion, and sparkling Mediterranean blue eyes, is simply too precious to be believed and ignites too much jealously to be tolerated.
This is what is really going on. See it for what it is.
There is no alternative for us whites but to get our bearings in this tsunami. I have a hard time believing the blindness in so many whites. How moronic can you get?
The blond and blue eyed Brazilians I know have a chip on their shoulders the size of the national debt over this issue. It is simply intolerable for an actual blond and blue eyed white person to wear the blinders of a mulatto. Intolerable.
Such stupidity is beyond the ken of reason. It is maniacal in the shear scope of its idiocy.
#5 by shari on 11/08/2008 - 9:14 pm
Dave, I think it is more than about the beautiful ideal. But it IS about our race. This is what is confusing to many, and where we can say something.
#6 by Dave on 11/09/2008 - 12:43 pm
Shari,
I disagree with you on this. Your statement is coated with the patina of Political Correctness.
Political Correctness cannot stand against elementary truths. It focuses on abolishing race based, sexual gender based, and sexual orientation based discrimination, when the real discrimination operating in life devolves purely on the axis of physical attractiveness.
That is why real discrimination exists against disabled people and the ugly.
Because I’m involved a lot in hiring, I see this directly and have always seen it. And nothing in my many years of experience with this has led me to any other conclusion, regardless of the character of the organization and I have been involved with many different kinds of organizations both for-profit and non-profit.
I know that if I want the physically attractive male or female in my organization I’m going to have to make my wage offer higher.
Then HR sits around and pretends it isn’t real.
It is as real as it gets.
#7 by shari on 11/09/2008 - 4:22 pm
Dave, I’m sorry. I didn’t say what I was thinking. I wasn’t thinking about ugly vs. beautiful. I read a comment elsewhere saying that the elite class among whites is the most expendable. That they could be eliminated tomorrow and the white race would grow a new one. I thought that would also apply to the the ideal beauty. After all whites can produce blue eyed blonds, even if the parents are not blue eyed or blond. You see it all the time.
#8 by Simmons on 11/09/2008 - 5:36 pm
It could probably said of degenerate civilizations that they substituted words for the founder’s stock. Like today our degenerates of the left with their impotent rage or the conservatives who are rearranging the deck chairs, and none of them are successful or happy with their words. Evolution marches on and over yet another dead ideology.
#9 by Dave on 11/09/2008 - 8:02 pm
Shari,
It is critical that white nationalism not fall into the trap of fighting Political Correctness with Political Correctness. It is very easy to do. This is what the BNP does in Britain, and it is the opposite of what is needed.
We can’t get balled up mentally. The Left and Political Correctness is bought and paid for by filthy rich white people who are extremely vicious and cynical in their thinking. You can never allow yourself to forget how evil Warren Buffett or Nancy Pelosi is, these are truly evil people and they are motivated by a cynicism you and I are not capable of.
They traffic in the anguish of little colored girls who without exception will pick the white blond and blue eyed Barbie. I know colored people, they are desperately unhappy with being colored. It is not because of white discrimination against them. It is because they want to be white.
And I don’t take pleasure in it. Nor do I take pleasure in the plight of ugly people or disabled people. The discrimination they suffer makes me mad, and that is Political Correctness I myself will cop to.
But in truth, there is not a whole lot that can be done about it.
#10 by Simmons on 11/10/2008 - 9:59 am
Then Dave have some sympathy for those who want some form of physical seperation. Not everyone of your coming white overclass will live like the plantation owner who has children who have “little chillun” playmates before going on to the ruling class.
#11 by Dave on 11/10/2008 - 1:53 pm
Simmons,
You are complaining because you want security.
I don’t need “white heritage day” and “white history month”. The mutts outside my door don’t bother me.
The road forward to success is easy. Everything you need is at your feet. And you throw that away because you are intimidated by Oprah?
Hey, Oprah is the colored cleaning lady’s (who is currently mucking out your toilet at the motel) happiness. And you want to take that away from her?
Have a heart. It is not your job to be weak.
#12 by Prometheus on 11/11/2008 - 1:38 am
Simmons, societies tend to degrade when they change their base, the core of their society, what defines their society.
Words and universalism replace what was once a society for a specific group of people, for themselves.
When I raise a family, everything I do within that family is for my families benefit.
Likewise, a society, a civilisation is for those people who partake in it’s creation, for that specific group of people who are bound more or less by blood.
But when you introduce wordism, you are, as Simmons said, changing the purpose of that society to one which serves blood and people, to one which serves ideals.
If I valued good grades in my family so much that I was willing to replace my children with more studious children, simply to fulfill this abstract goal, then I would no longer have a family.
Likewise, no one seems to think twice about importing, or replacing or assimilating out our own racial member “for the sake of the ‘economy'”, for “social cohesion” for “crime” for “cultural relevance” or whatever reason.
#13 by Tim on 11/11/2008 - 7:25 pm
Bob,
What was the actual date you announced the start of the new holocaust? Wasn’t it at the start of the Iraq war?
(I cannot find your post)
Recently, I have heard enough comments about “Jew bankers on Wallstreet” to make Hitler blush. And many of the comments from rich self hating white liberals. I recalled your comment years ago.
Jews should have hired Bob Whitaker as an adviser.
It is ironic that Stormfronters and White Nationalists ALWAYS talk about the blinders that Aryans have on their eyes. They never mention that the Jews are actually in a much more precarious position. We have a counter culture structure. We can take power one way or another, consolidate and rebuild. They cannot. It is all or nothing for the Neocons.
I am sorry but we don’t hold a candle to the Jews. Jews have that same gene that makes the moths fly into the flame…and they fly into the flame every time. Jews are not renegades. They do exactly what the rabbi’s tell them to do……and always end up in a holocaust.
good call Bob
#14 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/11/2008 - 8:21 pm
A Civilization is a place where White Folks live.
All around the world, brown skinned creatures dwell among the ruins of White Civilizations which they can not even comprehend. In every case that civilization was destroyed by the presence of non-White invaders; not torn down by savage aggression, but destroyed simply by the presence of savages.
White Folks have always gone out into the wilderness and began what grew into a Civilization.
The savages do not build civilizations, they simply invade ours.
Social Scientists strive to find any little piece of evidence of civilization among the ruins and the brown skin, so that they can point to that and praise the brown skinned savages for their great “achievement”, but all they ever find are small remnants of the great White Civilization that was once there.
We are the Builders of Civilizations, and they are the destroyers.
#15 by shari on 11/12/2008 - 12:29 pm
I don’t think that the parallel is exact either. That would be utterly hopeless. I also hope that the time of waiting around and marking time is over, even if I don’t exactly know what will happen.
#16 by Prometheus on 11/14/2008 - 5:49 am
Shari, it doesn’t matter if you don’t know what will happen. You are in a better position than most others if you know that you don’t know.
#17 by Dave on 11/14/2008 - 11:36 am
Shari,
Predicting the climate (as opposed to the details) of the future is easy. All you have to do is look at India, a country in permanent stagnation.
My Indian friends roll on the ground in laughter at the idea that India will one day transform. India will transform on the same day gravity becomes variable.
Congress Party is the citadel of world Political Correctness, and the primary vehicle of Brahmin rule of India, a rule that cannot tolerate removal of its veil of Political Correctness, given the multiracial and multicultural character of Indian society.
Take the Taj Mahal for example, India’s main source of tourist related foreign exchange. The Taj Mahal is a Muslim mausoleum with a wonderful love story connected to it. What makes this true is everybody says it is true. It is the official story and there is no other story that is permitted. However, anyone with a brain and a will to think for themselves knows this cannot possibly be true. The Taj Mahal is a Hindu edifice and was not and could not have been built as a mausoleum (it is in fact just a piece of a huge city like complex). It is blatant that it is not a Muslim edifice (nothing points toward Mecca), even if you do just a little thinking.
Archeology is banned at the Taj Mahal. It will never be permitted. Brahmin rule requires that the Muslims get credit for this wonder of the world for exactly the same reason the that nonwhites and particularly Negroes get credit for achievements they could never have possibly been responsible for in America.
It is absolutely Orwellian. You are required to repeat and believe in a lie, and if you don’t, you are an enemy of society and the state, and most importantly, you are an enemy of the Brahmins who rule behind the scenes.
Permanent stagnation. Forever, and ever, and ever.
Even though the whole world is becoming India, we cannot get rid of the desirably of (real) blonds. And we cannot get rid of the few among us that insist on doing their own thinking.
#18 by shari on 11/14/2008 - 12:58 pm
Dave, It’s the same old story isn’t it? Genocide the whites and then permanent stagnation, or “in the darkness bind them.” I haven’t spent my life carefully doing my own thinking. But I do think that I have learned to spot those who do, and to be some judge of character. I also have to lean on hope. I can’t do otherwise. The last time a sick zoasterism was threatening to turn the world brown, Christ killed it. This time?? Maybe life from the dead.