One thing you can really get out of reading back over BUGS, to the extent I am right, is how things really WORK.
For example all this cheating on facts, as in the brazen case of Global Warming. We all know that, in the gigantic competition for research grants, the first thing any person does if he ever wants a grant is to vet his research for Political Correctness.
But most people never DISCUSS this.
A research grant means a career. A single publication in a journal is worth tens of thousands of dollars to anyone in research and it is life and death to a professor.
We know that, but no one ever TALKS about it.
People are pushing books on secret conspiracies, but the REAL conspiracies, the ones right out in the open, are completely ignored.
We all know that any research project which promises to back something Politically Correct is ninety percent of the way to being granted. It WILL be published.
Why is it that no one who discusses what is going on ever MENTIONS this?
How can you deal with reality if you ignore it?
Those who were cooking the facts on Global Warming were astonished when their open planning to suppress contrary information was such a scandal. Where the hell had the dumbass public BEEN all this time?
A generation ago Arthur Fleming was astonished when his Civil Rights Commission was reported by, of all people, Time Magazine for cooking the figures on integration. His orders had been, “Show it works.”
Fleming, like the Global Warming types, had assumed that everybody knew that any research was to prove their point. He was astonished at the reaction when he just said so.
Don’t tell the dumbasses, and you can be sure no one will say what any idiot should know.
#1 by BGLass on 10/05/2011 - 8:47 am
when the internet was allowed to happen, it was just assumed it provided “another vehicle,” and that no new or suppressed voices could emerge. all the previous silence was taken to mean irreversible subjugation, the complete triumph of trotsky, the triumph of generational re-education, thought reform, and “reconstruction” (political re-education and occupation) of human personality to such an extent that no other reality could even be entertained, except the most ‘approved’ and narrow.
lo and behold, how despite so many “national” arts codifiers, dispensement of grants for arts productions, the advent of many college “Programs” to ensure people understand exactly what to produce as “arts” (the “m.f.a.” style regimens and “grants” for “arts”), people still create things “outside the box” of rhetoric of defamation, degradation, oppression, class mentality, the elevation of the “urban” as the highest value of the world, the city as the zenith, etc.—
in fact, the ‘urban’ ideal looks a bit silly now— just wanna be thug looking people wearing black leather, driving too fast down country roads which feel alien to them, giving people the finger and talking too loud, and singing along to vapid city pop songs, without realizing no one else is even on the road with them b/c they are in the country, lol.
Much past arts production seems another clueless outsiders take on things, like in that movie Fargo— a well-crafted, expensive movie, yes, but with no insider’s understanding, i.e. insight— just an extended “arts” program joke about how stupid people are in the boon docks, (the emotion engendered, not catharsis, but feeling smarter than one’s fellows as the viewer leaves the theatre.)
Arts in this climate, create the emotion of feeling superior to others. It’s rare a “drama” can even produce various well-defined points of view with any depth at all (which previously was the whole purpose of drama). For we are all the same.
A bunch of blind people touching the elephant can’t write a “russian novel,” which would require depth thinking, (not to mention an audience who could read without mentally shutting down in confusion). The “right” loves the “small business owner.” But they just live on markup. Buy low, sell high, like any market speculator. Why tout them?
Loss of the Innovative LIFESTYLE, (where people live creatively), seems such a tragedy.
nevertheless, the main socializations seem Agrarian (related to the west and south, the colonists)–growth from scratch, genuine self-sustaining, sufficiency, jack of all trades, many interests. Then is Manufacturing mindset (from the remnants of the Industrial revolution, now dispossessed—‘time is money,’ yeilds, productivity, competition, smith-joneses, subdivisions, being ‘on the line,’ teamwork, focus on one job),
–and now is the PC Religion, (slaves, race baiting, superiority, dependency, service mentality, service economy, takers, usery, “redistribution” of what was there, no ‘making’).
In this scheme, wealth is always elsewhere and must be “found” and “gotten”— (this new “american” man) is an ‘intelligence’ that must be “imported,” (from elsewhere) and ‘brought in.”
In the Agrarian and Manufacturing the ‘human subjects,’ the people, are involved in creating, (even if it plays out in different ways). In the 3rd, (“the new service economy”) there is no creativity, not really.
These seem the 3 main strains.
No one asks: ‘what does it MEAN for me to be named “a consumer” by self-described “elites?” Am I really just an Eater? Is it good to be positioned as an Eater by others?
No one says, “What does this rhetoric (this way of being) have to do with the advent of the externalization of this metaphor (in real-life—the appearance of the “aneorexia” or “bulimia,” LOL— this silent protest of either Eaters or Starvers or Pukers.
No one will look at such an obvious connection!
wow, got off on a rant track.
#2 by Frank on 10/05/2011 - 8:50 am
We are ANONYMOUS
We are Legion and we are Everywhere.
We never forget and never forgive White Genocide
Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-White.
Expect us.
#3 by BGLass on 10/05/2011 - 8:56 am
sorry–
but really, how do you talk about internal realities to those who have no interior?
anyone listening to t.v. should immediately understand why “bulimia” or “anorexia” appeared. Also, why it was connected to the Rome metaphor.
why we know man is more than whatever you write on his blank sheet, more than the skinner conception— is because all this has all been done to humans so many times, (over and over and over) and yet a few always survive and protest the whole mess of it. blah.
#4 by Simmons on 10/05/2011 - 11:25 am
Two questions will usually kill a cult or a specific taboo. Basically IMO that is what the Mantra consists of, an interogation.