Hate — Righteous Indignation practiced by the wrong people.
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
#1 by Dick_Whitman on 10/07/2011 - 12:11 pm
Here’s an interesting article on the spread of ideas. It claims that only 10% of a population is required for a new idea to become mainstream among the population as a whole.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-minority-scientists-ideas.html
#2 by SpinRabbit on 10/08/2011 - 8:37 am
Great article Dick, thanks.
#3 by BGLass on 10/08/2011 - 9:11 am
“There are clearly situations in which it helps to know …how to suppress a developing opinion,” said Associate Professor of Physics and co-author of the paper Gyorgy Korniss. [ie this person is studying how to suppress real opinions]
…The researchers are now looking for partners within the social sciences and other fields to compare their computational models to historical examples [to prove their point about the 10%. The recently-created pseudo-sciences –“social sciences” have most likely produced the most willing “partners” –students and academics– who will produce similar papers proving this point in regard to information suppression among the American people, in particular, as D and R’s are mentioned].
…They are also looking to study how the percentage might change when input into a model where the society is polarized…[like] Democrat versus Republican….”
Bugs always says this is the way the game is played. But despite reading such articles, many americans will continue to say “that’s cynical” that academics and teachers study how to suppress opinion. (So, why can’t they simply hear what was said, lol)
this clearly states, a new job is ‘partnering’ to link 10% to historical documents in the interest of suppressing public opinion and learning how not to allow genuine opinion to gain traction. this is stated.
Polarization is one of the acknowledged steps to genocide. Real Public Opinion Suppression Studies, as desirable as they might be to some groups, will not stop polarization as it relates to genocide.
(So—- Is the idea to continue the genocide —that would be indicated in situations of polarization as here— and is that the reason for the “desirable suppression of opinion?”
It would be interesting to hear the answer from the article writers and academics involved, maybe.
they offer “village” situations as examples of where information should be suppressed, yet then examples of americans (the false dichotomy of democrat v republican)
such articles really show how people think
Also— here’s a CV for one of the academics mentioned. Knowledge suppression is big business, one assumes. http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~szymansk/files/B.K.Szymanski-Vitae.pdf
#4 by Dick_Whitman on 10/08/2011 - 10:17 am
I’ve mentioned before that if we can get 25% of the so called “movement” to be on a consistent message, good things would happen. Hopefully the audios from the last practical politics conference can help get us to the 10% that the article explained. If we can get 10% in the “movement” to accept the idea of a consistent message (based on fighting White Genocide), then this will spread to the larger “movement.” And then, a unified movement can work on getting 10% of the public to understand and reject White genocide.
With that said this article has helped me understand why the anti-Whites are so desperate to suppress White & Normal discourse. One of the past efforts to shut down Amren included the services of a “former” FBI employee. It struck me as quite slip-shot and sloven in its obviousness. I now realize that it was actually desperateness. They needed someone quickly to take up the leadership for the effort to suppress Amren’s free speech. They cannot allow the 10% to form.
Of course we at BUGS know that the quickest way for ideas to spread is to stay on a consistent message. Anti-White CUNTS are so fearful of this that they don’t even acknowledge the existence of BUGS.
In fact, to the anti-White CUNTS reading this: how about you send your “former” FBI guy to demonstrate and draw attention to BUGS?
I didn’t think so….CUNTS!
#5 by Genseric on 10/10/2011 - 9:55 am
The 10% effect. Otherwise known as critical mass.