A major reason you have reason to read what I write here is because of an ancient rule: Where reality is being unlocked by any kind of man-built dam, the person who sets out to defy that dam, that man, will find something original and useful to say.
It is hard for us to believe some of the things men were required to say under censorship in history. So it would seem logical to look at what is forbidden today and look for the resulting nonsense.
Unless, of course, this is the first generation in the history of civilization where there is no imposed dam.
Before you laugh at that idea, remember that every generation in history HAS believed it was the first generation in the history of civilization that had no unreasonable barriers to discussion.
Rome did not consider its ban on Christians unreasonable, nor did Christianity consider its ban on pagans and heretics at all unreasonable. Christians would laugh at the silly superstitions of the old pagan, but they would lynch anybody for saying the universe was created in more or less than six days.
The power of such a dam against heretical thought can disastrous. The Communist system managed the almost unimaginable feat of keeping two to four hundred millions white people from producing on single new or useful idea for two generations.
We are all familiar with the Periodic Table and with Pavlov’s experiments. These were produced in a Russia in the few years between the time it actually entered the Western world and the time it became an oriental despotism again.
Once again this is a point, and what we make here are POINTS, not just “arguments,” that only BUGS can effectively make.
Instead of accusing the other side of censorship and taking on the burden of proof, I make the full point above: Is this the first society in history where censorship is NOT blocking progress? Every other generation believed that, and was wrong.
You see, when a generation dams up the flow of discussion, the potential knowledge behind those dams builds up. Which, to the best of my ability, means that I am constantly talking about things others are not allowed to THINK about.
If the reader can get nothing out of that, he is in a class with those who kept their flow of thought in line with the Inquisition.
#1 by Dave on 11/08/2011 - 10:14 am
Let me sum up the “civil rights” legal package we have suffered under for the past fifty years neatly. Legislators and judges really do “make it up” as they go and suffer no constraints whatsoever:
We live in society where we are the slaves and bondsmen of somebody else’s prayers while simultaneously the Establishment tells us with a straight face there is no Established Religion.
So the President, the elected representative of the People and sworn to uphold the Constitution and its provisions for Free Speech, means for you not to deviate into the proscriptions of his enforcement powers, lest you are an enemy of CIVIL RIGHTS.
So it is only enemies of CIVIL RIGHTS that point out that an Established Religion has been sewn into the LAW and it is only enemies of CIVIL RIGHTS that refuse to be the bondsmen of the prayers of the religion of others.
And also every time I hear some bastard say, “We have got to come together”, I am actually being informed of a mandatory requirement to say the prayers of another man’s religion.
#2 by Simmons on 11/08/2011 - 10:33 am
How do we get by without a dam? Its easy, we are an effeminate society. Women will destroy their minds to stay within acceptable bounds, and in America today white women are doing exactly that while also spending loads of money on theraputic shopping.
We patronize momma, Little Missy and a whole host of white women as they slide into insanity. It is the path of least resistance because who wants to deal with a crazy woman?
Four Myle can insert an essay on the need to reestablish the patriarchy at anytime.
We will have to get over our squeamishness of hearing the white woman’s wail. That means we will have to be much better men.
#3 by Harumphty Dumpty on 11/08/2011 - 12:37 pm
This was SUCH a pleasure to read! Sometimes I don’t understand Bob, but I didn’t have any trouble with this one.
#4 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/10/2011 - 9:26 pm
One of the most important things we are not allowed to speak about:
The Federal Government is relocating to the underground complex at the Denver airport.
All of the Oligarchs have spent billions of dollars constructing underground bunkers, and they have moved out of the large cities and away from the coast.
If I say that we should move out of the large cities and away from the coast, I will get shouted down and decried as a “nut”.
The Oligarchs usually only let go of a nickel in order to get a better grip on it, why would they spend billions of dollars for no reason at all?