One commenter asked me to do a piece on the Republican primary here on Saturday. As an exception to my usual ignoring of news and Jews.
South Carolina’s Republicans shame me.
They are, above all things, obedient. After Buchanan won the New Hampshire primary, I knew for sure that South Carolina would reject him.
South Carolina has the highest percentage of soldiers and of veterans of all the states.
They defy nobody.
I was raised in a state which defied the world on segregation and which seceded first. But in today’s Potemkin Patriot society, it is the state of Dole and Bush and Romney.
There is an old subpopulation here, one that will give Ron Paul the second place.
But the sons of the white trash are desperate to prove they are middle class, and that the world of William Buckleys and Miss Piggy need not be ashamed of them.
#1 by shari on 01/21/2012 - 10:06 am
It is so embarrassing to watch somebody trip all over themselves, to flatter somebody who doesn’t even deserve simple respect.
#2 by Simmons on 01/21/2012 - 10:49 am
The Fed pension transplants have brought the “guilt” culture with them to SC, the “shame” culture supplies the rest and there lies the RINO teat suckers establishment. Anyway young Hunter is also analyzing the primary and RRS comments about #25 that all is not hopeless.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/01/21/live-thread-south-carolina-republican-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-447734
#3 by Dick_Whitman on 01/21/2012 - 2:50 pm
With election season around this means that Respectable Conservatives will be showing displays of “country club bigotry.” They’ll talk about welfare queens, and rant about Mexicans who need to learn English. Country club bigotry usually occurs in the GOP primaries when the respectables conservatives are trying to impress the Middle American base. They’ll do some “fiery” speech about “traditional Judeo-Christian America” and this will get the hoopleheads riled up.
The fact is this kind of discourse about blacks on welfare is unnecessary and meaningless. It’s purely a release valve to vent the anger of middle America for anxieties that these same respectable conservatives contribute to (forced integration and assimilation with the 3rd world, endless war, constant multiCult trauma). .
The GOP leadership has done a very effective job at making White America believe that Israel’s interests as a Jewish state are more important than any kind of White American interests. GOP hooplehead voters will defend Israel’s right to be Jewish but will back down like cunts when it comes to thinking about explicitly White American interests.
When it comes to serving the globalist elite, the American Right manages the military action wing. The American military is the main force of arms for the globalist anti-White elite. American Right wing “nationalism” revolves around fighting heroic wars for Israeli, corporate, and globalist interests. This is the great narrative for middle America. They get to bring “freedom” and “democracy” to people that don’t want it (and these people happen to be Israel’s enemies too 😉 ).
Country Club bigotry is a waste of time. But this is all that respectables can offer. Whites are starting to understand that they have interests just like any other racial or ethnic or religious or cultural or fraternal groups. Soon respectables will be checked by pro-Whites for leadership of middle America.
How can pro-Whites not replace respecti-Cons? Pro-Whites actually will try to pursue the interests of Whites (and oppose the globalist agenda with anybody). People will start to see how vile respectables are when they try to compete with pro-Whites for leadership of middle America.
When it comes down to it they (Respecti-Cons) can only offer a globalist world, while we (Pro-Whites) can offer the Universe.
#4 by Dick_Whitman on 01/21/2012 - 3:32 pm
I should probably explain “country club bigotry.”
A country club bigot is a White person who uses racial epithets when he’s on the golf course or on a hunting trip. He may send racially insensitive cartoons and jokes to co workers. But if you ask him if he opposes White genocide or if he’ll support pro-White activists, he’ll quickly get into respectable mode in fear of losing reputation in the community or sustaining a loss of profits in his business.
Governor Perry supposedly had a racially insensitive sign at the entrance of his hunting lodge. He’s responsible for masses of immigrants flooding America. Most of the employment gains in his state went to hispanic immigrants. Perry is a classic country club bigot.
He’s useless for pursuing White interests (in fact he’s complicit is hurting White interests).
Pro-Whites will replace country club bigoted, Respectable Conservatives for leadership of Middle America.
Newt, Perry, Santorum, Limbaugh, Hannity, these people offer NOTHING.
#5 by Gavin on 01/21/2012 - 8:17 pm
The Rick Perry’s are like children, telling themselves they are mature and “grown up” for using “naughty” words and joking about “taboo” topics. Then when Mommy Professor comes in and gives them a stern look, they revert to their natural childlike obedience and fall in line with Mommy’s rules.
I agree with Bob that the “respectable conservatives” form a protective layer for Mommy Professor. When they are there keeping everyone in line and obediant, Mommy Prof doesn’t have to face the hard questions.
I have noticed signs in Canada that the “respectable conservatives” are losing their credibility as more people notice they are Mommy Prof’s sheep herders. They biggest problem is the RC’s sheep herders who try to convince us that the RC’s are really on our side but Mommy Prof is just too powerful to confront so we must resign ourselves to small concessions.
They way to confront this layercake of BS is to get straught to the heart of the matter and put the question to anyone in the way, that’s where the Mantra comes in.
#6 by BGLass on 01/21/2012 - 3:02 pm
VA & NC seem to have tons of paper hats, too.
They are pro-life but only if it’s a fetus and pro- pre-emptive strike wars, also. The height of morality is “anti-abortion” but when you ask —given that regular abortions is a recent phenomenon– what people before based THEIR morality on, they have no answer.
The Vietnam vets were much more disillusioned, seems like. Now, maybe to offset that, there are 24-7 patriotic infomercials, especially around the holidays about ‘volunteering for vets,” (in the richest country, there is never enough to eat, and volunteers do veteran’s home makeovers as well as soup-kitchen style meals all the time).
But it’s true— narcissistic injury, injury to some sense of self, is what seems to make them that way. “Identity politics.” The feeling of not being good enough, maybe from being white trash or the bootcamps, is something they want to shed, badly. Illustrating they achieved “the good life” (however they construe it) soothes that old wound.
The world of contradictions in the Romney-Bushes-Santorums lineups is not even perceived. well…my father’s house has many mansions, sorry just gabbing, but soldier-ing seems to whip folks down, and it’s a double dose if they had some form of christianity that is all about self-abnegation.
#7 by BGLass on 01/21/2012 - 3:19 pm
When it comes to serving the globalist elite, the American Right manages the military action wing. The American military is the main force of arms for the globalist anti-White elite…”
—the military just votes its paycheck.
one of the reasons we have to have wars, seems like, is b/c the voter base of the “right” would be lost without the infantry voting ITS paycheck, so it’s a symbiotic deal.
Fine— but what makes it MORAL? b/c both “right” and “left” are infinitely MORAL, (in their own opinions).
Military voting for wars is just like EBT card users voting for programs. That’s all.
But these used to be things that supported an actual society, lol. People in those groups cannot even project what internal reality is like, and how it is different, for those not in the warfare OR welfare ‘games.’ What would those people (who used to be the actual society) DO?
It’s amazing people exist who can really take seriously a person whose main deal is “being anti-abortion,” or “against gay marriage,” or whatever.
— I don’t care if warfare OR welfare votes its paycheck— but that doesn’t make them MORAL.
#8 by Dave on 01/21/2012 - 5:16 pm
The absence of basic thinking makes the circus.
An election is supposed to foster a political settlement that is good to the next election.
Anyway that is the basic idea the suckers put their faith in. Never asking themselves, it that possible? Does the world actually work that way?
I don’t think the world works that way. I really do.
#9 by WW on 01/21/2012 - 8:11 pm
Sorry for the Off-Topic but my posts are not appearing on “Where did you post the Mantra today?”
#10 by Gavin on 01/21/2012 - 8:35 pm
The big cheers in the debate when Mitt Romney said that republicans love legal immigration were absolutely pathetic.
Both the statement and the cheer had no purpose other than to be a sycophantic assurance to Mommy Prof that they are obedient little boys and girls that just want Mommy Prof to allow them the illusion of dignity while she engages in their genocide.
Yep, as long as all the t’s are crossed and i’s are dotted, they can pretend their dignity and will sign their own death warrant.
#11 by BGLass on 01/21/2012 - 8:51 pm
he should like immigration; he’s from mexico. I don’t understand the psychology of people drawn to the republican party. Young “leftists” are often just naive, and unaware of larger politics and how shamelessly the old use the young. but what do they see in santorum-romney; americans don’t back immigration, not in real statistics.
#12 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 01/27/2012 - 1:33 pm
I guess we need to stop condemning the sheep for being sheep, and lead the flock in the right direction.