One thing you should keep realizing is how points made here seem to tell the future.

For example, it looked a little funny to some people that, when I was concentrating on race, I had a lot of space on the nature of institutions. Now we are running into a situation where American Renaissance must be understood as an institution.

We certainly LIKE American Renaissance, but the danger is that it will go the Republican/respectable conservative route.

In the early 1960s the very idea of a conservative getting air time was intolerable. All political discussions on national TV consisted of two liberal Democrats and one or two liberal Republicans.

Two SEPARATE things happened. First, conservatives stopped being purely defensive and began to denounce the shibboleths of liberalism openly. By 1968 Nixon and Wallace had an overwhelming majority of the vote.

This was undermined, not by a Conspiracy meeting in Lower Broscupal or somewhere, but by a natural tendency. Liberals, who owned the media both literally and figuratively, chose conservative “opponents” they felt comfortable with.

The result was surprisingly effective for the left. Conservatives survived professionally if they looked like all-out opponents to their own featherheads but gave the other side what it needed.

Respectable conservatives have taken on a role as RATIFIERS of liberal policy. No one denounces “reactionaries” and “racist” as loudly as the professional right. But this obedience is not the big thing, the ratification.

Leftist policies go through many years of being denounced by professional conservatives. But, inevitably, the day when they can say, “Even conservative columnist George Will” or “even William Buckley now agree that…”

This means the policy has now become that of “both sides,” and there is no room for further debate.

Anyone who listened to part of the debate Jared was part of in Canada can see how this could easily happen to pro-white institutions. From the first word, Jared conceded and conceded and conceded, not by statements but by silence.

And silence is the other side’s weapon.

If there is a policy in place to wipe your race off the face of the earth and you join with the other side in refusing to mention, that it is too radical, it is ratification. I have no suspicion that Jared and friends are doing this on purpose.

They are just politically naïve.

I have been in the midst of things while politically naïve conservatives became the best friends leftism ever had.

Like other guerilla operations that have to develop their own program, we have evolved our own terminology. It is one hell of a lot easier to say “Tailgating” than it is to keep repeating the whole story, that we have found, in action, that if you keep trying to answer the crap that is thrown at you, you stop killing effectively.

There are other terms we have developed that only occur here.

One phenomenon that wastes a lot of time to explain is an error Lord Nelson made and INSTANTLY CORRECTED, which in itself is as much a lesson as anything else. But every time I talk about it I must go on to explain that the important thing was not Lord Nelson slipping into it, but his instant recognition and correction.

The first couple of times I mentioned it I explained all this, but Lord Nelson came back with another apology, which can wear you down and, more important, gets off the subject.

LN finally got the point that he should not apologize, but the fact is it gets us off the subject to talk about that original correction. WE need a TERM for that.

What LN did was to attack immigration as genocide. He left out assimilation. This is a VERY easy error to commit, and pro-whites do it all the time. It makes one’s path far, far easier, because the same people who will scream anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews if you criticize interracial marriage will discuss immigration with you as if you were human.

Hannity heard that David Duke opposed interracial marriage and said “You really ARE a Nazi!” He himself opposes open borders. So it is easy to slip into this groove, because it is so much smoother, and you haven’t realized WHY it is so much easier.

So from now on let’s call this almost unnoticeable slide into respectability “Sliding.”

Some of you are finding, IN ACTION, what works. Before the last few years, I had no chance to cut the Mantra.

The reason for that was that every time I brought it up, the people who discussed it were just discussing it. They had never USED it. So none of that helped me at all.

On the other hand, I really learn from BUGS reports, because they are REPORTS, not theorizing about what “people” can understand. So you have isolated what WORKS by itself in the Mantra.

You have developed mini-Mantras, a term which, justly, would have had me blowing my top five years ago.

Now you have been IN there, you have USED the Mantra, you are not talking about what theoretically might lead to something, but, from hard experience, what WORKS.

IN every subject, the instructor beats the basics in, but he is trying to get his students to the point where they can begin, very carefully, to make their own rules, their own contributions.

Please go ahead and do it.

But DON’T Slip. One person was talking about his success, but I looked over what he said, and everything he said had to do with “culture.” He impressed people, but in the end he didn’t SAY anything. He forgot to look at the message he left, not at how impressed others were.

If you win easily, be sure to check back and see if you didn’t just Slip.

Jared has replied to us:

http://whitegenocideproject.com/too-hard-to-awaken-whites-to-white-genocide-an-exchange-with-jared-taylor/#comment-2098

Jared says that his institution can’t sell this genocide stuff.

Which once again goes back to the nature of institutions.

Jared is running an institution. An institution has its own priorities. Jared has succeeded in building a pro-white organization that can run a sizable pro-white convention.

The problem we face is quite simply that with the present institutions we’re going nowhere.

Our talk show people cannot get an audience with only what we are putting out there.

Jared is telling us that his people just can’t get their minds around the idea that a concerted effort to get rid of the white race is genocide. We have seen the people he is talking about in the Stormfront debates about the Mantra.

I am beginning to suspect that, if we think about this rather than just reacting to it, we may deduce something interesting:

The people who are the backbone of an institution, those on whom an institution depends continually for existence, tend be precisely those who are most resistant to new concepts.

Jason says:
It’s imperative that everyone on the pro-White side understand that the Mantra is what changed history. It’s not just about credit; it’s about understanding how change occurs and how to safeguard our people. If Mantra thinking isn’t understood, Whites will remain in grave danger.

I went to Duke’s YouTube page, and I was disappointed. I had no idea his presentation had strayed from being pro-White to simply another anti-Zionist page. Same thing with the A3P party. They avoid being pro-White at all! I am not even sure what they hope to accomplish. Just imagine if they had used Mantra concepts in their campaign. What an opportunity lost.

Now, there is some saying about being blessed with dumb enemies, and at least we have that. The anti-Mantra pro-Whites (AMPW) do not strike me as too bright. And the actual Anti-Whites are turning into cartoon characters – I never get an original response from any of them (almost half the responses tell me we deserve genocide due to something they heard from their second grade teacher about “Native Americans”).

The curtain has been pulled back, and there is no great and powerful Oz among the Anti-Whites. The Anti-White system is fragile. They are using silence, because they dare not engage. And at some point that looks like weakness to anyone watching. Even among animals, when a reigning leader who has grown weak is challenged by another male, the incumbent will try to ignore him as long as possible – because he knows he will lose an open fight. I hope that’s where we’re at now.

When it comes to massive killing, Mao Tse Tung has no historical rival.

Yet his book is legal everywhere and he is a hero to most of the world.

Some particularly brave scholars try to point out the tens of millions Stalin killed, is not only more than Hitler, but, more important, it was in PEACETIME. During World War II, the United States interned the Japanese. What would we have done to them if we were being firebombed in every city?

BY the way, the governor of California who enthusiastically carried out this Japanese internment was named Earl Warren.

But of special interest to BUGS is not one more screaming example of moral hypocrisy on the part of ant-whites.

Instead the reason for Mao Tse Tung’s being a hero and Hitler being the Evil God of our established religion is exactly the same as the one that held back the Mantra for so long.

The Mantra points out that “the world” includes those countries which are not white. It never OCCURRED to anybody, on either side, that when one spoke of “racial policy” it meant “racial policy in what we take for granted to be ‘the world.’”

So when they say the policy for “the world” is mass immigration and assimilation, it never occurs to anybody that “the world” includes nothing but traditionally white majority countries.

China is no more in Mommy Professor’s world than it is in any rural hick’s. The only difference is that Mommy Professor believes, and college grads believe, that Mommy Professor knows all.

We all know that to say that Mao killed more people than Stalin and Hitler combined means absolutely nothing.

He didn’t kill PEOPLE, he killed CHINESE. Even Ukrainian peasants are almost included in Mommy Professor’s world, especially for discussion of “When they’ll be ready for immigration”.

In fact, ready for immigration and assimilation , to a former questioner and political operative, is the sure sign that an area has become part of Mommy Professor’s “world”.

This has not been noticed, like about everything else I point to, because it is as true of pro-whites as of anti-whites. Hitler killed Jews, and just about everybody who now preaches to pro-white believes Jews are not just human, but superhuman.

The reason this is not even NOTICED is because the assumption of pro- and anti-whites is exactly the same: A bunch of Ukrainian peasants halfway out of their Real World simply have no relationship to real people, while CHINESE are on the level of chickens, you can kill a billion of them if you’re an Asian and nobody says a word.

Least of all Asians.