I’ve thought about this deeply with those who call themselves “anti-racist” and give themselves code words to hide behind.

If you put religion on to this it really fits well.

I am not religious, I am agnostic. But it’s still interesting if you look at the allegory that Satan, in order to be worshipped, needed to pretend to be God, because no one would worship Satan.

It’s pretty simulair to this. If they were openly anti-white no one would support them, so they have to call themselves “anti-racist.”

But their intentions are the same.

They speak with a forked tongue, putting nice words to evil deeds. They sound nice but always want evil.

I thought I would post this entry from Bob’s Old Blog.

It seems the dam is breaking. God love the torrent!

“I know politics very well. I do not look for a harbinger anywhere in the immediate wake of the realizing that America’s transition is done and that it

IS racial.

We got The Message out just in time. That job is still far from complete.”

Did Bob get the message out? This TruthCat may be hard to put bad in the bag, much less in the bath!!! Claws and fur!

“An old right-winger wrote me that the big question in politics is Socialism. A lot of old-timers are still stuck in that time warp.”

This was my reply:

Maybe it is because I was an economics professor, but I don’t take economics as seriously as other people do.

I think white people tend towards capitalism for the same reason the Chinese invent things and do nothing with them while we make revolutions from

gunpowder and the printing press.

We make the printing press work. We get gunpowder and we end up on the moon. The free market is just something else that we make work.

You are pointing at economic ideas while America is turning brown. It doesn’t matter what economic or political theory a brown country says it believes

in, a brown country will be a tyranny and it will live in poverty the minute there are not enough white countries and white people to pull it out.

Simplistic isn’t it? Simplistic like supply and demand.”

Now for the direct parallel to Mark Steyn and Ann Coulter’s recent articles. Bravo you two, Mark and Ann! I hope you both can take a stand, and be

someone.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333583/tribal-america-mark-steyn
http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/11/14/demography_is_destiny/page/full/

You might want to look back over the article “The Cave” before reading this one.

This article will probably be understandable only to those who have been out there duking it out with anti-whites on the net, because it refers to the subtleties of TIMING.

You learn the critical nature of timing only when you are up against the other side.

There are several lessons about timing you take for granted with a little practice fighting with the Mantra.

The first is that anti-whites are only killing time until their Censor shows up.

One commenter pointed out that an anti-white said to him, “I thought this was already covered,” meaning doing away with the white race. He didn’t realize that what he meant was that he had never been in a situation where The Silence had not been imposed already.

Only when you get into action do you realize how critical timing is. Again, to begin with, your opponent is waiting for the censor to show up.

Secondly there is a very short window of information. One of the basics of sermonizing or lecturing is that what the speakers says must be 99% what the listener already knows and a maximum of 1% new information or a new twist on information.

Along with my preacher granddaddy’s rule of “The mind can only absorb what the seat can bear.”
The difference between BUGS and Dave and Jared is whether this one percent of very limited time is used, 1) to blame it all on Jews; 2) to demonstrate that despite your racist conclusions you are a classy educated and sophisticated chap; or 3) to talk how they are joining in the genocide of your race.

In the cave I referred to the fact that I spend at least 99% of my time here describing the cave which is our present mindset. Then I use that 1% to introduce the world beyond the cave, from the spot where the cave curves out of sight.

By the time we get through with the cave and all the way out to the curve, our time is almost out.

One example, I explain to someone that Zoroastrianism was limited to Aryans, just a the original Olympics Oath included the words, “I swear I am of unmixed Hellenic blood…”

He then pointed to the web page for Modern Zoroastrianism, which started out with a statement that Today’s Z was for Everybody, regardless of race, creed or claws.

“How,” he said, “Could they have been limited to Aryans?”

I figured any real talk was hopeless, because he had just demonstrated that he was too dumb to read what was in front of him:

I said, “That proves my point.”

Anyone with a brain knows that no religion starts out its web page by saying that anyone can join it and give it money unless they have a specific reason for doing just that. It did not say, “Despite the fact that real Z was limited to Aryans…” it might as well have.

He couldn’t see what he had just read.

The 1% of discussion I had to get around the curve was used up. I might have said more, but he couldn’t absorb it.

Time beyond the curve is precious and very, very short.

One sure sign that a religion is ESTABLISHED is that all other points of view are seen as the same thing. So during the Inquisition, it really didn’t matter whether you were a Calvinist, an theist, or a Deist. All these categories, as important as they were to themselves, came in one brand, called “heretics.”

Exactly the same is true of our present established Faith. Everyone is not a Politically Correct is “on the right” or “conservative. The Only True Change is Cultural Marxism, so anyone who claims Real Progress is in any other direction if a heretic, just like the other heretics.

So at the same time we outgrow this “conservative” orientation and go to “pro-white,” I am forced to use the old terminology. Otherwise I cannot describe over half a century of lessons I have learned without repeating everything I said above again and again.

Our established religion is not inventive. So everything they do they have done throughout my long, long political career. So I will often refer to how “liberals” use a certain tactic. I will not explain every time I do that. MY label has changed, but nothing they do ever changes.

I can give lots of specific examples of standard tactics used by established religion, whether I saw them in days when all opposition was “the right” or not.

So don’t get all tied up in trying to get off using the term “a liberal tactic.” If one doesn’t understand what I mean, he isn’t ready for BUGS. Our established faith uses the same old tactics against pro-white as it did against the entire world it named “conservative.”

Measuring how many people are on an Internet site reminds me of press reports of the number of people in a demonstration.

One demonstration I put together required for working people to rent buses and take off time from work. Many of them signed a list of their names and where they came from. About half did not get to the list, which was twenty thousand.

Press reports on the numbers marching depended on the paper. In the Washington Times I believe it was thirty thousand. The Washington Post advertised five thousand. Our press man offered to show them the list but they were naturally uninterested

So there are many figures for site readership, none of which I pretend to understand. I have a group putting out the message, which is all I care about.

But one real BUGSER mentioned a petition for the White House, which needs 150 signatures for something. One was talking about our Russian petition.

If I remember correctly one commenter said that while almost two thousand new people had signed up for Stormfront, only a handful of them bothered to sign a petition. Lord knows I understand his frustration with Stormfront.. But I am also very tired of telling people about things and having them forgotten.

Even the Washington Post might admit we have thousands of readers.

Meanwhile our estimate of the number of people here who have ever bothered to put up the Mantra in any form anywhere varies from one hundred to the long hoped for three hundred.

I can’t see how anybody can READ what I write and not be warned of this.

After fifty years it has been clear me for a long time that a lot of people are willing to discuss the meaning of “Anglo” or “American,” but almost NOBODY does anything.

If you are only willing to hold the fort if everybody chips in, your cause is lost.

Remember the Alamo?