I looked at one of the YouTubes cited in the comments. It was an anti-White speaking on campus.
One commenter on the You Tube said he was a “nerd.”
Boy, was that ever a telling blow!
BUGSERS have come far along in this business to wonder something with me:
How is it that membership group types unfailingly manage to find the least telling points conceivable to say? 
Only now that BUGS had been at it do we see ANYBODY saying anything that hits home with the anti-whites. The War Against Whites did not spring up out of nowhere. In fact one of those brains that hasn’t been mushed in News and Jews might wonder if it was accidental that that congressman’s phrase seemed to sound like those a former professional speechwriter for congressmen pushed.
So this guy with the mashed brain says “nerd.”
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, here is a guy like Tim Wise who hides behind the thugs who run campuses. They never have to come from behind their thugs and face people like me, so they declare themselves the winners. All totalitarian toadies do that.
But none of us would ever expect anybody outside BUGS to mention the thugs everyone knows about who rules the campuses.
The term thugs might get people to realize what is going on.
But so what? People who join up and pay dues don’t want to WORK for what they call their Cause, too. They stop when the fun stops.
#1 by Jason on 08/13/2014 - 1:38 pm
The War on Whites immediately had the flavor of a BUGS inspired term, whether the congressmen knew it or not. One way or the other, we are changing the battlefield.
Meanwhile, the Membership groups are breathlessly talking about the CAWN-spiracy, the impending Collapse of Everything, and oh yeah, don’t forget to buy plenty of Prepper supplies from our sponsors.
Membership types seem most interested in having fun and looking smart. They DISENGAGE their mind when it comes to the things we care so much about, which is why they revert to 3rd grade level observations and miss the important things.
#2 by activism on 08/13/2014 - 11:29 pm
Dr Duke has effectively called Bugsers his enemy in his latest rant. Two things to notice, one he is saying Whites should use the internet to spread his message, and using the internet to save our race mostly originated with Bob. Two, he is using genocide a lot now in the form of “Jews are causing genocide.”
“No more playing footsy with the Jewish overlords, those who don’t expose Jewish racism and tyranny and hatred toward our people…. as far as I am concerned…. are not truly in this battle for our survival.
Say that the real enemy of our European folk, the real power that is killing us and killing the world is the Jewish supremacist power. We now have the means, through the technology our people created to get the message out to the world.
So those who don’t want to say it but say they are for our renaissance, for our salvation, to hell with them!
They are collaborators. Anyone who collaborates with or who denies the Jewish role in our genocide…. now becomes a traitor to our heritage, our freedom, our people, our very existence.
The Rubicon has now been crossed.”
From https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1057634/
#3 by Secret Squirrel on 08/14/2014 - 4:20 am
Leave it to Bob and Don Black.
#4 by Daniel Genseric on 08/14/2014 - 3:40 pm
This from the very man who seemingly wants to give WHITE anti-whites a free pass. Listening to him, you would think only Jews were responsible for selling out our children and their future. That is patently FALSE because it is only half true.
I say, “To hell with THAT”, Dr. Duke. To hell with anyone who would give ANY anti-white a pass. To tell half of the truth is a utter disservice to our folk. Under Dr. Duke, the anti-white thugs on campus would REMAIN.
I don’t care who says otherwise -Doctor, Lawyer, Respectable Conservative, or Intellectual – no exceptions will be made.
If you can’t say the following and mean it with every fiber of your being, then YOU don’t speak for ME, Dr. Duke: ALL anti-whites, Jew and Gentile alike, must pay the piper.
#5 by Benjamin Newells on 08/14/2014 - 5:31 pm
It seems DD is using his position as a “respected leader” to put a social pressure on Pro-Whites to talk about Jews.
DD can see that Pro-Whites are talking about “WHITE GENOCIDE” and “ANTI-WHITE” more and more and talking about “Jews” less and less.
DD needs Pro-Whites to talk about Jews so that he can stay RELEVANT.
#6 by Benjamin Newells on 08/14/2014 - 5:48 pm
I quote DD:
“Over the past 30 days 850,000 views on my videos! That’s no joke. You can go to my channel and see for yourself. And that is only one-thirtieth of my real views because their are now thousands and thousands of videos of my work and lectures on the Internet! And they average a 96 percent positive rating!
You get that?
We are winning the war for the hearts of our people. Study how I do it, and YOU CAN DO IT TOO!
The only way we survive is if we depose the Jewish tyrants ruling over us.”
End quote.
One word: LOL
#7 by Benjamin Newells on 08/14/2014 - 8:00 pm
Keep in mind that Muslims are the ones who are totally responsible for manically sharing his video because of the recent Gaza episode. 90-95% of the comments and reshares on his video with 600k views are by Muslims.
#8 by -scythian- on 08/15/2014 - 3:09 am
I don’t care if Duke keeps “naming the Jew” for contributions, but the way he uses the word “racist” (at least from what I’ve heard here) is exactly how the kept opposition does; isn’t he embarrassed that he’s mimicking respectable conservatives & thereby helping the enemy anti-whites? He should be using ‘anti-white’, ‘anti-brown’, ‘anti-Arab’, etc. The way Duke uses the word “racist” is basically doublethink b/c the clear implication is that Jews shouldn’t be biased toward fellow Jews, i.e. the central tenet of “anti-racism” – race shouldn’t or doesn’t matter. How in God’s name does that help our people especially when we’re living in genocidal conditions?
The word “racist” should only be used in quotes to show that anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
And another thing I can’t understand is that if indeed there’s a higher rate of anti-white Jews than any other ethnic group, those anti-whites will be punished as ANTI-WHITES, not “the Jews”. How is that complicated?
#9 by Jason on 08/15/2014 - 4:07 am
THAT is the most disappointing thing DD has done – give the term “racism” credibility in exactly the way Anti-Whites use it.
He is basically endorsing “anti-racism”. And we all know what that is a code word for.
I think he’s just going the easy way to get clicks.
#10 by activism on 08/19/2014 - 5:40 am
If Bugsers want to save the WN movement and weaponize Stormfront, they need to take Duke to task over his focus on Jews on Duke’s SF threads. Also take all posters to task for the long run.
Stormfront and WN have been co-opted by Duke’s message of “Jews are evil.”
#11 by Secret Squirrel on 08/19/2014 - 5:56 am
I noticed you said nothing to David Duke while he was there, yet here you are, telling others to do it for you. At BUGS that is a big tell.
If you have something to say to David Duke, man up and say it to his face.
#12 by activism on 08/19/2014 - 6:23 am
I’ve said things before but it takes many voices over a long period to change things. I have written personally to Duke about this.
#13 by Secret Squirrel on 08/19/2014 - 6:26 am
He was right there in the thread. No one said anything to him. Just a lot of whining at BUGS.
#14 by activism on 08/19/2014 - 6:25 am
How is it a big tell when my advice is perfectly sensible?
#15 by Secret Squirrel on 08/19/2014 - 7:37 am
At BUGS you do something and report back. You don’t give advice.
Like I said, you and no one else here, had the guts to ask him about his comment in that thread.
#16 by activism on 08/19/2014 - 8:41 am
Can’t ideas be useful when they’re right? I’m not on SF presently but I can see its value. This idea was only for “if” Bugsers want to help save the larger pro white movement to end WG but if nobody wants to then that’s fine.
#17 by Secret Squirrel on 08/19/2014 - 10:11 am
If you want to stir things up over at SF, then do it. However I think it would be much easier to ask David Duke to clarify what he means, as soon as he says something you object to, as it will save a lot of BS down the road.
#18 by Jason on 08/19/2014 - 10:25 am
I don’t think DD is worth the trouble anymore. I would love to get SF on message, but HD has been through Hell just getting 150 people to sign a petition once a month.
It doesn’t look like DD got much support for his statement anyway, does it? Just 4 pages of responses? And that was with a chance to talk to HIM personally.
Sounds like his shot is more at Jared Taylor than us. But I don’t really know what he’s trying to accomplish these days other than get tons of Middle Easterners to click his videos.
He’s such a telegenic, well spoken guy, it’s amazing to think what he could do with a BUGS message. But, his clicks might drop and the books sales might go down, even though he’d have far more long term influence. But apparently that doesn’t mean much to him.
#19 by Secret Squirrel on 08/19/2014 - 10:52 am
I’m in agreement with you. People were far more interested in the latest Hollywood suicide, rather than Duke’s thread or anything else.
As Bob says, we are on our way. Anti-White and White Genocide are out there. There’s no need to screw it up with dramas now.
“tons of Middle Easterners to click his videos.”
If it was his plan to be the next Lawrence of Arabia, he has been very successful at it. He’s an activist doing his own thing, so I’m not going to worry about it.
#20 by j p on 08/19/2014 - 7:48 pm
I think what David Duke means is, those who refuse to acknowledge the Jewish role are enemies. Which doesn’t mean BUGS is the enemy per se.
BUGSers generally acknowledge the Jewish role, they just don’t focus on it as their main message.
Duke is a very valuable contributor to our cause, and I don’t want to throw him under the bus just because he’s said some slightly disagreeable things about the emphasis of our message.
He hasn’t made us the enemy. He singled out those who DENY the Jewish role. We don’t deny it, we simply choose not to make it the crux of our message.
#21 by Jason on 08/20/2014 - 12:21 am
There are anti-Whites everywhere, in every group. White Genocide is NOT exclusive “run” by this or that group. And as we’ve said many times, the most dangerous people are White anti-Whites.
#22 by Jason on 08/14/2014 - 10:00 am
In the Paltalk I wrote something like “Screamers are people who don’t have the courage to be Thugs”.
I think I was wrong. It felt good but calling them out for a lack of courage can be trash-talking which doesn’t make our points.
There may be times when it works to point out how the anti-whites are afraid to debate Bob. But that is in unique situations.
We also need to be on alert for guys calling themselves Mohammed Islam or sounding really gay, or some other stereotype. They may be faking it in order to bait us into making ethnic slurs.
#23 by Mark WN on 08/14/2014 - 10:57 am
“There may be times when it works to point out how the anti-whites are afraid to debate Bob.”
Jason – I believe you have pointed out something very crucial.
All the anti-Whites can do is publicly insult Bob and tell everybody how crazy his ideas are and of course how everybody should ignore his “crazy” ideas.
I believe there should be a BUGS driven NON-STOP FLOOD of public statements about how the anti-Whites are afraid to publicly debate Bob…NON-STOP.
#24 by Benjamin Newells on 08/15/2014 - 1:42 am
I found a guy calling anti-whites “nerds”:
“WHITE AMERICANS LOST THE WILL TO STAND UP FOR OUR CULTURE MOST ARE BRAINWASHED APATHETIC NERDS”
https://twitter.com/BNwls/status/500153672668413952
#25 by Jason on 08/15/2014 - 7:39 am
“Racial Healing” is code for getting rid of White people. The healing process will be over when there are no more White children.