The first intellectual rule of research is obvious to and understood by every literate person above the age of twelve.
Except professors.
Rule A One:
Put on permanent hold any so-called “study” that comes out exactly the way those providing the money want it to come out.
Some time ago two of the “top researchers on the environment” were caught with their pants down.
Emails between them made it clear that they were conspiring to make the case their funders wanted.
The grantors want to turn the entire industrial economy over to “intellectuals” like these two to prevent global warming.
This made unexpectedly big news.
So the University sponsored a study of whether or not the original researh was biased. 
Naturally they assigned this latter bit of objective justice to the same two professors.
After long and paid effort, they concluded they had been totally objective.
A lot of media announced that professional academics are ever more dominated by self-professed “Marxists.”
They make it sound like Marxist doesn’t mean much.
Marx stated that “the truth is a bourgeois concept.”
In short, a Marxist is prohibited from doing any research that is legal under American tax law.
Marxists declare that “Everything is political.”
To Marxists, objectivity is immoral.
Just to make it clear, we’re talking prison sentences here, gang!
#1 by Jason on 06/09/2016 - 10:17 am
Experts are not paid to get at the truth. They are paid to say whatever the paymaster wants to hear.
If the paymaster wants a house that will last 100 years, he gets something close to the truth from his electricians, builders and plumbers.
But he wants a study saying race doesn’t exist, and we need to concentrate all power in a world gov’t to save us from the weather; the expert will say that too.
#2 by Jason on 06/09/2016 - 10:26 am
I’d like to hear Bob’s thoughts on Artificial Intelligence.
Silicon Valley is saying human level intelligence is coming – just a matter of time. Could be decades or generations, but it is coming.
And once AI is as smart as we are, it will improve much faster than we can. More like exponential growth.
I know it’s off topic, but Bob talks about Space exploration because it connects to White Survival. I wonder if AI isn’t going to be important to our survival too.
#3 by Secret Squirrel on 06/09/2016 - 10:36 am
“I’d like to hear Bob’s thoughts on Artificial Intelligence.”
Me too, since Bob is a recovering economist. How will an economy work when most of it is automated? Who will the corporations sell their products to? What is their motivation to make things?
#4 by -Gar5- on 06/09/2016 - 1:12 pm
Artificial intelligence will basically just be ‘metal Asians’.
It won’t effect the economy that much.
Third world countries will still run on natural resources.
First world countries will still run on creative thinking.
#5 by Steadiness on 06/09/2016 - 8:03 pm
Intellectuals, being defined as those who can overcome their instinctual world-view, have long thought themselves superior to the average White man for that reason.
Taking evolution seriously, we understand that every emotion and every instinct of the average man is adaptive, and therefore intellectuals that ignore these instincts and emotions, at great effort, are not to be therefore be lauded, but mocked.
And finally, we can recognize that, while the average man can’t understand the PDEs behind modern physics, the average White man can intuitively understand biology, the history of the White race, and demand that Whites not be cuckolded by being second-class citizens in our own country.