Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Teaching whites to say “white(s)”?

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Teaching whites to say “white(s)”?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • Author
    Posts
  • 06/03/2012 at 3:26 pm #24817
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don’t see much reason to give this too much thought. It’s like constructing any other sentence in the English language, does one word help convey the message of this sentence more than another word? Usually you won’t even need to use the term pro-white, all it does is give the anti-whites the opportunity to talk about how they are pro-humanity. I don’t know about you guys but I’m not into anti-white gift giving.

    06/03/2012 at 3:54 pm #24821
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @iceknight: Wow! You are already a whiz at this! I’m afraid I was only poor to mediocre, and I have to get breakfast.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQmIkc-G0is

    06/03/2012 at 4:04 pm #24823
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Oh, but iceknight, if this was you:

    anti-white: Who the hell do you think you are to speak for whites? Who gave you that mandate?

    white: I’m White.

    I thought that was a GREAT reply. But I wouldn’t have followed it up by going into more detail in a later post. WE ask the questions!

    06/03/2012 at 4:33 pm #24826
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @iceknight: TOO much fun! Those two mediocre anti-whites are perfect to begin on and begin to acquire a little skill. After a poor start, I surprised myself, but it was a few fine posts by you that fired me up. I have to leave it now. Thanks for going first! If this succeeds, you will have been the first!

    06/03/2012 at 4:41 pm #24827
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I want to repost part of what I posted on page 1 of this thread about how I thought anti-whites will react. My brief experience just above makes me think these remarks are correct, and they may be a useful guide for anyone experimenting with this.

    White anti-whites will probably be very provoked by our appropriating the term “white” for ourselves. They claim to have shucked off their whiteness, but IMO their feeling of being privileged whites still lurks underneath all their bs, even in their noblesse oblige custom of ceding leadership to non-whites in some of their anti-white groups.*

    White anti-whites betray that they still experience themselves as “white” when they regularly object to us at BUGS calling them “anti-whites” by saying, “How can I be anti-white when I’m white myself?”

    If anti-whites truly consider “whiteness” just a social construct, and an evil one, then they won’t object to the most evil of the evil, ourselves, reconstructing “white” as meaning being like ourselves (white-and-normal)! Lol!

    But I predict that white anti-whites will shriek objections to our simply calling ourselves “white(s),” since I believe their claim to have abjured whiteness themselves is bs.

    In the “arguments” that ensue (we at BUGS don’t really “argue”), we will make the white anti-whites FEEL their loss of white identity.

    But vastly more importantly, that “debate” will make our actual target, the much larger white audience that’s observing, feel their own loss of white identity!

    Calling ourselves simply “white” will make other whites unable to just leave the fact of their own whiteness sleeping fitfully below the level of their consciousness!

    06/03/2012 at 4:43 pm #24828
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I want to emphasize this:

    Calling ourselves simply “white” will make other whites unable to just leave the fact of their own whiteness sleeping fitfully below the level of their consciousness!

    06/03/2012 at 5:02 pm #24831
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @iceknight or whoever posted the post below: it seems perfect to me!
    And I’m not sure I should have offered the one critical point I did on the preceding page (it may be myself who’s mistaken, for one thing). The best writing I ever did was under a teacher who never offered me criticism, but only encouraged what was right. Otoh, I’ve benefitted immensely on this site from others’ criticism here. I guess we do need to offer our criticisms, especially on a new ploy at which any of us are beginners.
    ——-
    “I’m definitely white.”
    You are an anti-white. Whites do not support White genocide.
    Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-White

    06/03/2012 at 5:30 pm #24835
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    @ elcyCesreveR yes I agree that standard anti-White response to “I’m pro-White” is “I’m pro-humanity” which is somewhat of a gift. Say “I’m White” and there is no such opportunity.

    @HD thanks for your support on that thread. The rabid anti-White response it triggered was a pretty impressive indicator that they don’t like it! LOL! Always a great sign that IT WORKS!!

    Yes I was testing some new ground – adding the further details did weaken my earlier point and I will avoid that in future. Loved your response to “I’m definitely white.” >> You are an anti-white. Whites do not support White genocide. << Follows the KISS principle and I will be using that as a standard in future.

    06/03/2012 at 5:46 pm #24837
    Patrick WhiteRabbit
    Participant

    Lovely work here guys! Those two UK based (i assume) anti-Whites are serious nut jobs. For some reason i assume spangle is a non White. The phrase “chatting shit” is not a phrase i hear Whites in the UK using much……its the “chatting” part that sounds non White to me. Maybe you should push Spangle to admit it is non White (i am convinced it is an Asian.)

    06/03/2012 at 5:48 pm #24838
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ iceknight: I thought that post was YOURS! Lol! Now I’m really confused. Doesn’t matter. This is going to be veeeery interesting. And those two anti-whites must have been sent by central casting to give us practice at just the level we need as beginners.

    06/03/2012 at 5:49 pm #24839
    Patrick WhiteRabbit
    Participant

    ………….Lovely work here guys! Those two UK based (i assume) anti-Whites are serious nut jobs. For some reason i assume spangle is a non White. The phrase “chatting shit” is not a phrase i hear Whites in the UK using much……its the “chatting” part that sounds non White to me. Maybe you should push Spangle to admit it is non White (i am convinced it is an Asian.)

    06/03/2012 at 5:52 pm #24840
    Patrick WhiteRabbit
    Participant

    ……..,,,,,,,,,…………….Lovely work here guys! Those two UK based (i assume) anti-Whites are serious nut jobs. For some reason i assume spangle is a non White. The phrase “chatting shit” is not a phrase i hear Whites in the UK using much……its the “chatting” part that sounds non White to me. Maybe you should push Spangle to admit it is non White (i am convinced it is an Asian.)

    06/03/2012 at 5:59 pm #24842
    Patrick WhiteRabbit
    Participant

    ……………,,,,,,,,————-Lovely work here guys! Those two UK based (i assume) anti-Whites are serious nut jobs. For some reason i assume spangle is a non White. The phrase “chatting shit” is not a phrase i hear Whites in the UK using much……its the “chatting” part that sounds non White to me. Maybe you should push Spangle to admit it is non White (i am convinced it is an Asian.)

    06/03/2012 at 6:35 pm #24849
    Ice Knight
    Participant

    @HD

    LOL! Not sure who takes the credit then, but it’s a great one liner to use as a standard response that kills their argument. Looks like “White” has potential, really gave them two clowns a thrashing – the two anti-Whites even had a lovers tiff as one was openly advocating for the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN and the other anti-White was getting very nervous and uncomfortable and told him to shut it! Never seen that before, may even have converted my first anti-White!!

    06/04/2012 at 1:42 am #24872
    Coniglio Bianco
    Participant

    Deleted

    06/04/2012 at 1:54 am #24874
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ iceknight: I expressed some doubts about our enterprise in a post on Bob’s blog that he wrote yesterday, that you may want to read and possibly comment on yourself.

    This experiment is so much fun that I expect to go forward with it, in some way that doesn’t interfere with BUGS’ standard operation.

    I think we should just report our posts here, and not on BUGS’ main working thread as I did yesterday, to avoid interfering with the FOCUS of bugsers on that thread.

    I wish the title of this thread didn’t appear in the right hand margin of the working thread every time we post here. That makes it seem like this is a major part of BUGS. I wonder if Brian could make it appear only once a day at most.
    ——-
    Here’s a line I thought of to use:

    You seem to place a lot of importance on your being white. You sound about ready to join the Klan. Lol!

    There’s so many entertaining things that can be said when the anti-whites start ranting about their whiteness! But does that entertainment open up our audience of white bystanders more to hear “white genocide,” or does it distract them?! And how will we know?

    Maybe some matters will become clearer as we proceed. I do want to do this in a way that it is very much a little-noticed sideshow at BUGS, that the old timers know is happening, but that newbies and old timers alike won’t be distracted by.

    These are just my own thoughts of course. You and others will have your own thoughts as well.

    06/04/2012 at 2:06 am #24875
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Coniglio: The appropriate response to a statement like this would be ‘how can you be White when you are an anti-White traitor?’ or ‘how can you be White when you are advocating genocide against Whites?’

    Wellll…the phrase “How can you be white” seems to me a bit too much in their face about their whiteness, and will draw attention to that issue rather than to white genocide (a danger in this whole undertaking, as dungeoneer just pointed out correctly on our working thread)

    I think the response I used in a post avoids that, at least mostly:

    “You are an anti-white who supports white genocide and that’s all you are.”

    06/04/2012 at 3:08 am #24877
    Coniglio Bianco
    Participant

    Deleted

    06/04/2012 at 8:52 am #24884
    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Coniglio: “I think we need to draw attention to the issue”

    I think it’s a great idea for the white movement as a whole to foster the practice we’re recommending, and that includes us as long as it doesn’t interfere with our very specialized role of spreading the Mantra.

    And the only way it cannot interfere with that role is if it helps us spread the Mantra and doesn’t distract us from doing that.

    BUGS is in no shape to take on two distinct tasks! We would need to be a very much larger organization.

    06/04/2012 at 1:09 pm #24897
    Coniglio Bianco
    Participant

    Deleted

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.