Archive for May, 2005
Thinking About Jesus
Posted by Bob in History, Musings about Life on 5/12/2005
The big difference between a Christian and a Jehovist is that Jehovists say they’re Christian, but they lose themselves in the Old Testament.
So they read about the Sufferings of Job and start doing Suffering themselves. They think God likes it. Origen castrated himself, and monks have spent their lives torturing themselves and making eunuchs of themselves for almost two millennia.
Meanwhile, instead of trying to find goody quotes from the OT, I THINK about what JESUS said.
He said, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” and “Love others as you love yourself.”
So, would I castrate someone or put them in a cold cell and deny them food for the rest of their lives?
No.
So why should I do that to myself?
For a Christian, nothing you can do to yourself compares with the only sacrifice that ever mattered to God, the one Christ made. But if you dote on the Old Testament, you can avoid the obvious fact that a Christian who tries to suffer his way into salvation is not only do it uselessly, he is committing blasphemy.
I am not a theologian, this is just Bob’s Blog.
But I honestly believe that Jehovism is dangerous to one’s soul.
You spend your life thinking about exactly what Jesus meant, or you can read the OT over and over. Or you read Confucius over and over.
About those who depend on the OT, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life. No one goes to the Father save by me.”
He specifically assigned a very righteous Priest of the Temple to Hell.
The non-Jewish Magi accepted Him, the Jews rejected Him.
Just how many hints do Jehovists need?
Alpha and Omega
Someone just asked me where my ideas come from.
Another person told me something that I think gets to the truth about where my ideas come from:
“Bob, things that other people don’t even notice leap out at you.”
An example of this is Jesus’s words, “I am the alpha and the omega, the beginning and the end.” Alpha and omega are NOT Hebrew letters. They are not Aramaic letters. They are Greek letters, and everyone who was listening knew exactly what Jesus was talking about.
When Jesus spoke privately with Pontius Pilate, what language do think they were speaking IN? The question never occurred to me until I started thinking about “the alpha and the omega.” Greek was the language of the Eastern Roman Empire. Greek was also the language in which the Roman nobility spoke to each other in Rome.
They spoke Greek, of course.
Jesus kept quoting the Septuagint, the Jewish scriptures in Greek. When Saint John wrote Revelations, and pronounced a curse on anyone who added or subtracted from them, he wrote in GREEK.
Luther and Calvin assumed that only Hebrew scriptures before Christ were Biblical. So they chopped out a huge part of the Catholic Bible that was in Greek. In fact, they cut out all of the Bible from the centuries before Jesus. Jesus Himself would not recognize the Bible I was raised with.
Catholics still keep these Greek books, as the Apocrypha, but they do not study it much. They almost never quote it.
But when Revelations was written in the first century, the New Testament had not yet been compiled. Each of the Gospels, including the many that were thrown out when the New Testament was officially complied, was THE New Testament for a large number of Christians. All they had as scripture was the Bible St. John spoke of in Revelations, and all of the last part of it was the Greek writings we no longer pay attention to.
So the last words of our Bible are a curse on anyone who would remove any part of the Bible, and it was written in Greek.
I am not a Bible literalist, so this makes little difference to me. For Bible literalists, this makes no difference at all.
So where exactly did Greek culture fit into the whole mosaic of Christian history? There were seven million Jews in the Roman Empire when Jesus was born, over ten percent of the total population. As Christianity advanced, these Hellenist Jews, like the historian Josephus, disappear from history quietly and entirely.
They became the basis of the Christian Church.
So most Roman Jews DID accept Christ, but they are the very Jews Christian theologians today reject. Both today’s Jews and today’s Christians do not see them as real Jews because their language was Greek, not Hebrew.
Looking deeply into this would not so much change theology, which is not my field. But it would change history, which IS my field. I want to know what political influence those millions of Jews had in the time of Christ that allowed them to be the only people exempted from the rite of emperor-worship.
I would like to know what how five million people, as they became Christian, began to make their alliances and throw their weight behind the increasingly vicious struggles for imperial power. In the third century, Roman emperors ruled for months at a time before being killed. There was something desperate going on.
And when Constantine accepted Christianity, was it a religious decision or a political one?
All from thinking about “the alpha and the omega,” I realize that there is a giant void in Roman political history without which the history we have is pure myth.
Americans Treat Europeans Like a Minority Group
Posted by Bob in Musings about Life on 5/11/2005
Since World War II Americans have looked upon Europeans as a minority group.
I do not believe in one-way guilt, the reason blacks are stereotyped as criminals is because, not only are so many of them criminals, but it would never occur to a black “leader” to blame this stereotype on black criminals.
Minority groups get stereotyped. Minority groups stereotype us. If Europeans are STILL regarded as inferiors by Americans, it is because they ACT the role far too often.
Europeans think of themselves as highly sophisticated. Americans agree. The Chinese regard themselves as Very Wise. Americans do, too. The problem is that all that “regard” is patronizing.
American Indians are always seen as Noble and Honorable. Blacks are looked upon as Victims. Jews are seen as Highly Intelligent.
I defy you to find a single documentary on television about a tribe or ancient society that does not express amazement at how sophisticated they were.
In other words, ancient civilizations need to be defended against what we really think of them. Blacks need to be defended against what we really think of them. Chinese need to be defended against what we really think of them.
And, Europeans need to be defended against what we really think of them.
So we loudly proclaim that all these groups are Very Wise, very sophisticated, Noble Bearers of Oppression, and so forth. As a professional people watcher, I know very well that when someone says how noble or something another people is, they are adding “for inferiors like they are.”
We are saying, “Yes, they are inferior, but they have this huge redeeming characteristic you wouldn’t expect in a lower people.”
How do you spot a patronizing attitude? It is very easy. Just look at how criticism from the other group is taken.
Once my father was in London, and an Englishman walked up to him and said, “You’re an American, aren’t you?” My father said he was.
“Well,” said the Englishman, I know a lot of bad things about America.”
My father replied, “I know a lot worse things about America than you do.” He thought the incident was funny.
Now turn it around. An American walks up to a visiting Englishman and says, “I know a lot of bad things about England.”
That will never happen.
Blacks insult white people all the time, but whites simply don’t care. For every week in the last sixty years, Europeans have been on the streets with anti-American signs. From time to time we get angry about it, but in general we couldn’t care less.
One of the major reasons no one will listen when we quote hate-filled texts from black “leaders” or the Talmud is because, at gut level, white Americans expect that sort of behavior from people they regard as their frustrated inferiors.
At the same time, we are desperately careful never to say anything critical about those who are not white Americans, because we assume – correctly – that they live or die by our opinion. American criticism of any European country will make headlines there.
Can you imagine a headline saying, “French President Criticizes US?” Americans would turn to the Want Ads for something interesting.
This can get amusing. Canada is part of Europe. Some years ago, American weathermen would refer to a “Canadian cold front” because a cold front was coming down from Canada. Canadians protested loudly, and you will never hear that phrase again.
No one here will tolerate any criticism of Canadians. To put this in plain English, no one will be allowed to insult the poor little Canadians or the poor little black folks or the stagnant Chinese or the poor, defeated Indians or the poor oppressed Jews.
A short time ago I complained on Stormfront Britain that Scots called me a “Yankee” but I would never call a Scot an Englishman. Members of Stormfront Britain formed a united front and declared that they had every right to call me a Yankee, but I had no right to call a Scot an Englishman.
I had broken the No Criticism rule.
Which is what led to this blog.
Three Words Could Restore Free Speech
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/10/2005
Three words would straighten out much of Political Correctness.
Those three words are, “in my opinion.”
For example, if all those people who “it is God’s Will” had to say “It, IN MY OPINION, God’s Will,” they would be forced to recognize what they are trying to force on other people – naked self-righteousness.
If people were forced to say, “There is no room in this society for what, IN MY OPINION, is racism,” this statement would be recognized for the totalitarian declaration of war against free speech that it is.
If one had to say, “America is built on what, IN MY OPINION, is diversity,” it would expose the fact that the last thing they want is real diversity.
It is worth interrupting anybody, the more repeatedly the better, with those three words. “You mean what, IN YOUR OPINION, is such-and-such.” If you did it all the time, over and over, every single time, they would get tired of it, but they would also cease to preach at you.
You ought to constantly called into talk shows and quoted some “that is what America is all about” and said, “Don’t you mean that, IN YOUR OPINION, is what America is all about. Why should I care about that?”
Those three words, if you beat someone’s head in with them, could restore free speech.
History in Your Pocket
Posted by Bob in History, Musings about Life on 5/9/2005
This may only interest an old economics professor, but indulge me.
When you see an Old West movie, you see them giving coins to the bartender. In the old movies, a cowboy would walk in and throw a silver dollar down on the bar and say, “A drink for everybody in the place!”
It was fun scene, because the silver dollar made a resounding clang on the bar.
And it could buy a full round of drinks.
Obviously a dollar was a different thing then. You could get a free drink in many bars if you bought a nickle beer.
The dime, quarter and half-dollar you might have in your pocket are still the same size as the pure silver coin that used to buy so much.
If you walk into a bar today, throw two fifty-cent coins on the table, and say “A drink for everybody,” you will still get a free lunch, but it will be at the psychiatric ward.
But if you want to know what size the coins were in the Old West, the answer is right there in your pocket.
What about gold coins?
It happens that gold weighs almost exactly twice as much as silver, 1407 pounds per cubic foot for gold while silver weighs 705 pounds per cubic foot. Gold was worth sixteen times as much per ounce back in the Old West.
A gold coin the size of today’s dime was twice as heavy as a silver dime and was therefore worth 32 times as much.
Do the arithmetic and you will find that a gold coin the size of a dime was worth $3.20.
It is always a shock to someone who sees an old gold dollar for the first time to notice how SMALL it is. A gold dollar was less than a third the size of the dime in your pocket.
The British pound, called a “sovereign” back then, was the size of one and a half dimes.
Big name, small coin.
So when you see the pitifully tiny amount of gold a miner panned out in a day back then, be impressed. A tiny bag of gold dust was a lot of money.
Establishing Religion
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 5/7/2005
The Constitution says that government shall establish no religion.
The law says that religious institutions are tax deductible.
Make up your mind.
I Need Your Help, My New Show Begins Tomorrow at 6 PM EDT
Posted by Bob in Bob, Race Matters, SF Townhall on 5/7/2005

MAY 7, 2005
JOIN US, and be a CHARTER Saturday Listener
6:00 P.M. EDT
Duke WebCast Streaming Radio URL may be pasted into the Play box or clicked here:
http://67.43.157.31:8000/listen.pls
If your computer doesn’t automatically begin streaming our program when it is ON THE AIR, or won’t play our recorded programs, you might want to download the latest Winamp 5 free player under the button below.
Tomorrow, Saturday, May 7, 2005 at 6:00 PM, EASTERN Daylight Time, I begin my first Saturday program on the Internet.
David Duke has a show everyday except Saturday, and after he found that I make a good guest, he started asking me to take over a Saturday show.
You can listen to it by going to stormfront.org. I forgot to check, but I think you can get it via davidduke.com, too. It will be posted here on the blog. [See links below.]
This should be a hoot. I just learned how to use my headphones and I would say this was off the cuff if I wasn’t wearing a tee shirt.
David is real go-getter and a pro. He had his radio own show in Louisiana for two years, and it outdrew Rush Limbaugh.
They dropped him finally because he couldn’t get any advertisers.
Dave has a very formal intro to his weekly show.
I did a tiny stint a couple of times as a radio announcer back when we used tom-toms, but I am actually a ham radio type. I have had ham license for fifty years. Any hams out there will get the idea when I say my original call sign was K4ACV.
That spells OLD.
For me being on the air is just talking.
There will be no intro, at least for now. I will be talking. If you want to ask me anything, you will have to register on Stormfront or comment here on my blog. I will keep up with both. On the blog just put NFP (Not For Publication) if that is what you want.
Unless you specify otherwise, I will refer to you as “someone who reads my blog asks….”
It would help the blog if you did write me there so I could mention it on the show.
The object of the first show is to get through it. If there are problems, tell me.
You don’t have to be listening to the show to write me questions on the blog.
You may start now if you wish.
.- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .-
For viewing, or posting (if you are a subscribed forum member) to Stormfront CLICK HERE and GO TO the SF Webradio Townhall – on the right in the page count bar, click “Last” for current posting.
Or CLICK HERE which takes you to the last post on Townhall.
5/7/05 Bob’s Weekly WOL Articles
Posted by Bob in WOL Weekly Articles on 5/7/2005
Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles
May 7, 2005
News Flash! Religious Bias On Campus!
A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Waste
Being Liberal Means Never Having To Face The Facts
Making The World Safe For Democracy
Fun Quote:
The crisis continues.
In every category, almost 50% of the American population is below average.
.
News Flash! Religious Bias On Campus!
Air Force Academy Wrestles with Alleged Religious Bias was the headline this week. Do you think that ole Bob’s message is starting to get across?
Well, no.
You see, there is Christian bias at the Air Force Academy. It is so bad that a group called Americans United for Separation of Church and State has gotten involved.
The Left has groups to combat even the most imaginary of problems. We have trouble even recognizing really big problems. As G.K. Chesterton said, “Men can always be blind to a thing so long as it is big enough.” This article provides a case in point.
The “religious climate” at the Academy includes “allegations of anti-Semitism, favoritism for born-again Christian cadets and conversion attempts by evangelicals on the Colorado Springs campus.”
Do you think that there is anti-white bias at the Academy? Do you think non-whites are favored over whites? Do you think the professors there promote leftist nonsense in class?
The article states that the Pentagon is taking these allegations “very seriously.”
Do you think the Pentagon would ever even consider our complaints, except as perhaps signs of sedition?
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Waste
How stupid does one have to be to take the USA Today seriously? Look at the list of offenses that have the Pentagon up in arms.
They include “proselytizing by Christians, use of Bible quotes in official e-mail and an ad promoting Jesus in the base newspaper, signed by 200 academy leaders.”
Also, the Leftist watchdogs for Separation of Church and State allege that “non-Christian cadets were harassed by seniors and that Christians were allowed to display crosses in the dorms while cadets were barred from hanging non-religious items.”
By the way, did the Pentagon ever figure out why they were unable to stop three hijacked airliners from hitting the WTC and their own building on September 11th, 2001? Or has this issue got a higher priority level?
Perhaps this is so important because, as the article states, it grew out of a survey of students and staff following a “2003 scandal in which nearly 150 female cadets alleged that they had been sexually assaulted by fellow cadets in the previous decade.”
Are we supposed to consider these two events related? Are we to believe that increasing Christian evangelism correlates to increasing numbers of sexual assaults? That emailing Bible quotes and hanging crosses in dorm rooms produces the same result as integrating neighborhoods?
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
Being Liberal Means Never Having To Face The Facts
Can you imagine a Respectable Conservative pointing out to a liberal that “nearly 150 female cadets” being sexually assaulted completely destroys the left’s arguments for women in combat?
Everyone knows that conquering armies rape the women of the losers. It is understood that the aggressiveness required for waging war spills over into other behaviors.
So if women were the equals of men in combat, they would sexually assault men at roughly the same rate as men assault women.
“Nearly 150″ to zero does not bode well for the combat readiness of women. Only someone as insensitive as ole Bob will point this out.
Of course, it would be really insensitive for ole Bob to point out that none of the traditional religions allow women in combat. Only the religion of Political Correctness insists on this.
The article has several other figures that aren’t meant to be studied closely. For example, “55 instances of religious bias in the past five years” translates to 11 per year. For a school with 4,000 cadets, that translates to less than one quarter of one percent. Since the school is 1% Jewish, less than 1% Muslim, and roughly 8% other, does that sound like such a big deal?
Do you think that out of a group of 40 Jews, 30 something Muslims (at a military school in the midst of a war in the middle east) and 350 assorted non-Christians you could find 11 who might not like Bible verses in emails or crosses in dorm rooms?
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
Making The World Safe For Democracy
Air Force cadets are being trained to enter into combat to bring “democracy” to the unenlightened nations. Of course, don’t expect them to be allowed to practice it at home.
You see, just because 90% of the student body is Christian, that doesn’t mean that the 0.275% who have some sort of minor complaint about that shouldn’t be allowed to overrule them.
The beautiful chapel at the Academy is the “most recognizable” building on campus, which is another grave cause for concern. You see, the main floor is given to the Protestants, with only 60% of the cadet population. The Catholics have to settle for a downstairs room, coming in at only 30%. The Jews get a synagogue at 1%, and the Muslims have a prayer room.
The “Others” get rooms as well.
It is all sooooooo unfair!
It is all sooooooo confusing!
Our ancestors would have understood why the chapel is the “most recognizable” building on campus. They built it that way. They understood that the military was meant to serve a higher purpose. It was meant to serve and protect a workable and recognizable order based on eternal principles.
They sure were a bunch of hate filled bigots.
5/7/05 Insider Letter
Posted by Bob in Insider Letter Archive on 5/7/2005
(Reprinted to Blog from email list of 5/7/05)
*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***
Tonight, Saturday, May 7, internet broadcasting will reach a new level.
Please note that I did not say a new HIGH level. There are laws about Truth in Advertising, and I have enemies in high places, low places, and places that cannot be mentioned in a family publication.
Tonight, May 7 at 6 pm Eastern Daylight Savings Time, I will host a one-hour program on Duke Radio. It can be heard through Stormfront,
and at
or directly when On Air by
copy/pasting WebCast Streaming Radio URL into your program’s play address box or click here:
http://67.43.157.31:8000/listen.pls
It will be archived, so those of you who miss it can laugh at me by hearing it later on the two websites given above or from my blog.
Why am I doing this? Because they asked me to.
David Duke has a one-hour radio show every day at 6PM EDT except on Saturday. I am a very good guest. James Edwards has a radio station in Memphis that also goes out on the Internet. His best guest to date in drawing power was Bay Buchanan, which is the big leagues.
But James said that when I’m on, I outdraw even Bay two to one!
The reason I’m so interesting is precisely the reason so few people ask me to be a guest these days. I say what you are thinking, which is what I do on WhitakerOnline.
So David Duke asked me to take over a show on my own.
This is fascinating. I have been an amateur radio license-holder for some fifty years. I did a very short stint as a radio announcer at the University of South Carolina in the 1950s. James Kelso coached me through a trial run, and it is a lot like ham radio the way I do it.
David Duke has been a professional radio announcer. He had a program in Louisiana that outdrew Rush Limbaugh for two years. But David couldn’t get sponsors.
So David has an impressive introduction. I won’t start with a prerecorded intro and music. That’s not because of modesty. One of the best announcers in the business has offered to do my intro, and I will take him up on it eventually.
This is the reason I will not have an intro, and it is very important to anyone who listens to my first show:
An intro means one more button to push.
My goal for the first show is to get through the show.
I am NOT kidding you about this. I have to keep the show going while learning to use my headset and the little equipment I need to use so Duke Radio can handle all the technical stuff for me. If you take off the headset, which I will have to do sometimes (a headset is a set of headphones with the mic attached) you can get a sound that is like an explosion to the listener.
There are a dozen things I have to learn, and I will be learning all of them Saturday. I will be sitting here doing all that alone, and will have to be on the phone, too, if I need technical help, which I will. And any references I need, including WhitakerOnline archives and Stormfront comments, will be on my computer screen and I will have to use the mouse and keyboard there.
All this with only two hands and half a brain.
You should get a hoot out of it.
So will I. I have long since discovered that the only way to do something is to go ahead and do it. As for screwing up, I lost my ability to be embarrassed about the time your granddaddy’s parents first let him go to the outhouse by himself.
This week could be boring except for when I step on my headset, but James Edwards said he would be guest whenever I ask him, so if this week’s a bust, he can make the next one interesting.
David Duke has already developed an audience. This broadcast reaches the entire planet earth. You can hear it clear as a bell in Antarctic. The audience is all over Europe, all over America, Australia, New Zealand, EVERYWHERE. It is banned in Germany and France and, Germany and France hear it.
There are more people with computers today around the world than had radios in 1950.
Our little headsets are destroying monopolies the media spent decades and billions of dollars to get.
I may make a lot of crashes and be talking into my show when I think it’s the microphone, but the world media monopoly don’t see a bit of humor in it.
I’ll be having a good time. The media moguls won’t.
That’s 6 pm Saturday EDT.
Bob
What Church Does Bob Belong to?
Since the Methodist Church of my fathers became a modernist abortion, I have been searching for a church, a real church.
I went to the Baptists for a while until they became The Church for the Worship of Israel. I went to fundamental churches until they took the same route. That is why I dislike Jehovism so much. I wanted a church, and Jehovism spoils the ones that modernism doesn’t.
The people I worked with in politics who were Calvinists were hard-core Calvinists. The Catholics I worked with made the Pope look like wimpish. This is the kind of people I naturally work with, and each group was firmly convinced that the others were headed straight for Hell and said so.
I disagreed with all of them, but they were people I could work with. I can work with sincere people I do not agree with. Insincere people are the ones I do not ALLY with. I manage them.
My Catholic friends in Washington did not like the modernist trend in the Catholic Church, so they joined an Eastern Rite church which is allied with Rome, the Melkites. It has the same rites it has had since the fourth century. Many years ago, they prevailed upon me to join them.
Apparently some sixteen centuries ago in Lebanon, the Melkites were in a battle with the other Orthodox Church in Lebanon and they allied themselves with Rome. I don’t remember the details as I was very young at the time.
The Melkites consider themselves entirely Orthodox.
None of this made the slightest difference to me. Sincere Christians invited me into a church that was actually a church.
I spent my time in the catechumate studying their faith and was baptized. I made it very clear that I had no theology except that I wanted to believe in a personal relationship with Jeux Christ. They accepted me.
I went to the Melkite Church while I was in Washington and I still love it. They took me in when I needed them, and I will never forget it. It is the only church I send money to from time to time, and the Melkites have never spent a dime on anything but religion.
Recently the Melkites asked the Pope to back up his preachments abut ecumenicism. They asked that, where there is no Melkite Church, they be allowed to attend either a Catholic Church or an Orthodox Church. The Pope had been talking a lot about “healing the breach” between the Eastern and Western Churches, so they asked him to make this official.
They got an OK from at least one Orthodox patriarch, but the Pope refused. If you don’t have a Melkite Church handy, and very few places do, you have to go to a Catholic Church. I am baptized Catholic through the Melkite Church, but I am not a Catholic.
Maybe I should attend a Catholic Church. Maybe I should attend a Methodist Church. But I don’t. There is too much baggage there that to me is anti-Christian and anti-white. They are not worshiping Christ, they are USING Christ.
To me, that is what my circuit-riding grandfather, in his out-of-date language, would have called pure evil.
That is what MY conscience says. What YOUR conscience says is your problem. I have to answer to mine.
I have enough trouble just believing in Christ. I am 99% atheist. That doesn’t bother me. If that were not the case, Jesus would not have talked so much about the need for faith.
All I want is a CHURCH. Jesus said that when two or more gather in His Name, there He is also. Like Saint Paul, I couldn’t care less about the theology or how may times you bob your head up and down or whether you genuflect or how you recite the filioque or if you just sit there and shout “AMEN!
But when you try to find a church, the theologians are standing in the door blocking you out.
I cannot find one single case in the Acts of the Apostles where an Apostle demanded that you take a detailed theological examination before you were baptized. But Baptist, Presbyterian, Catholic, Orthodox or Lutheran, the theologian stands in the door and examines you before you are allowed to become one of the two or more gathered in His Name.
I guess I am still an old Methodist. John Wesley preached tens of thousands of sermons over tens of thousands of miles of traveling. He demanded that the ignorant coal miners and the early settlers of Georgia come forward and be baptized. But while he had rigid theological ideas, he never examined anybody’s detailed theology before he baptized them.
If he ever did, then I reject John Wesley, too.
Wesley went out and preached to the ignorant, people like me. We are children theologically: “Suffer the little children to come unto me, for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.”
Jesus added that if someone rejected the children, which to me means the theologian who stands in the church door, it would be better for him had he never been born.
So if you ask me WHICH church I belong to, I feel very, very sorry for you.
Replies to Mark
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 5/4/2005
I approved comments by Mike but I can’t find them to answer.
So here goes:
2005-5-4 @ 10:05:19 pm [ Edit - Delete - Unapprove ]
Mark ( email redacted / ) (IP: …)
BTW: IM = Instant Message like on AOL
Uh, bob — er, I mean, “Mr. Idea Man”, — hate to break this to you but we all knew what IM stood for ten years ago. LMAO.
Mark: So did I, more than ten years ago. That last was added by my team. LYAO
2005-5-4 @ 10:05:15 pm [ Edit - Delete - Unapprove ]
Mark ( email redacted / ) (IP: … )
Which reminds me, I suppose the phone must’ve rung when you were reading my last email asking you questions about the nation of Turkey — you know, the one you didnt’ reply to yet. Thanks for setting the record straight. I don’t feel left out anymore.
Mark, as I just pointed out, I have Attention Deficit Disorder. If I leave out an answer, ask me again.
And by all means, LYAO
Latest From the Papal Election Recount
I would like my supporters to know that I have not yet conceded the election of that other guy as Pope. When a person refuses to concede in American politics, it leads to a great deal of ill-will.
I am proud to announce that my opponent, the present Pope, has not said a word about my refusal to concede. Neither has the media.
They are being real sports about the whole thing.
As to my campaign manager, who demanded a recount, he is being treated very well.
They are giving him solid food now.
I HATE Telephones!!!!!
Would you like a sure formula for going nuts?
Try making your living being an idea man and having Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) big time like I do.
You finally find the ideal solution: e-mail. You can write your idea down fast before it disappears.
You start to do it and the phone rings.
You are in the middle of something and an IM pops up.
I have phone mail so I can ignore the phone. I never answer an IM.
.
BTW: IM = Instant Message like on AOL
Judeo-Christianity
In the Middle Ages, when a man with money got tired of life, he committed suicide with the blessings of the Church.
We all know that not only was suicide a mortal sin in the eyes of the Medieval Church, but a person who committed suicide could not be given a Christian burial. In fact, one of the ways a person became a vampire was to commit suicide and rise from the dead.
But the Church approved of suicide if it was done right. When a Benedictine monk took his final vows, he was accorded burial rites. He became “dead to this world.”
If a wealthy man got tired of living, he was given church rites and buried alive. A priest accompanied him to his burial place. He was put in a hole and food and water were provided through a hole in the grave.
I said “a man with money” because he had to get the tomb dug, pay for the rites, and pay for the supply of food and water.
For the man buried alive death was not long in coming, but it was a Holy Death. He was assured of salvation.
Poor Origen! Origen lived in the fourth century and he was one of the greatest religious writers and teachers and theologians in history. But he was never allowed to become a priest and he has been damned by the Church.
The Church kept insisting that the highest virtue was sterility. St. Paul said, “It is better to marry than to burn,” but the best of all was chastity. Then poor Origen read these words from Jesus, which he quoted but I cannot find:
“Blessed are those who make eunuchs of themselves in my name.”
So Origen, following the teachings of Paul and what he took to be the teachings of Christ, got a knife and made a eunuch of himself. He spent the rest of his life being persecuted by the Church. He was denied ordination as a priest, he was excommunicated by his bishop.
But Origen kept founding new schools of theology and was too valuable to be ignored. Other bishops allowed him to serve, but none would ordain him.
Like suicide, being a eunuch was the holiest thing possible, but it had to be done right.
Jimmy Carter almost lost the presidency in 1976 because of a similar error. Jesus said that when a married man looked on another woman he had committed adultery in his heart. Carter quoted that to a Playboy reporter during the 1976 campaign and said he had committed adultery in his heart many times. His poll ratings collapsed.
CS Lewis, the great Christian writer, as an old man, said that God could let him live a lot longer, but he wished God would call him soon. That is committing suicide in your heart, but it is no sin.
I discussed the movie “The Believer,” where a young Jew was so outraged by the Judeo-Christian admiration of Job that he became a Nazi. In case you haven’t heard the story, God and Satan were talking about this guy Job who loved the Lord with all his heart.
Satan told God that Job only loved God because he was rich and healthy and had a nice family. So God killed Job’s family, took away all his possessions, and made Job sick and hated. And Job loved Jehovah anyway!
Jehovah showed old Satan what was what!
There is nothing wrong with killing a man’s family if Jehovah does it to win a bet.
And this, to my mind, is what is meant by Judeo-Christianity. It has no Jesus reducing all those commandments to two. It has LOTS and LOTS and LOTS of theology, but no RELIGION.
When the Spanish Conquistadores took over Mexico City, the Aztecs desperately sacrificed four
thousand prisoners to their god in a matter of a few hours to get them to drive the Spaniards out. They cut their victims’ hearts out and rolled their bodies down those great stairs this Great Civilization had built.
Only a few decades ago, the official line was the Aztecs did not practice human sacrifice at all. But this line was abandoned when thousands of skeletons appeared at the base of those Greatly Civilized steps, so historians declared that the Aztec priests could not have cut out THAT MANY hearts as fast as the Spaniards said they did.
So some doctors tested the theory.
Some doctors made realistic dolls and tried cutting out the hearts with the speed the Aztec priests would have had to have. They used the old stone knives of the Great Civilization of the Aztecs. At first they thought the historians were right for a change. It couldn’t be done that fast.
Then the doctors thought about it, used another technique and found out it was easy.
They were not the pros the Wise Men of the Great Civilization were, so they had to rediscover this ancient, sophisticated and lost technique.
The doctors may have been lost in the required Politically Correct admiration of the genius of this Lost Civilization. Everybody is always lost in admiration of the sophistication of all non-white civilizations.
The Spaniards, on the other hand, were appalled by this Aztec slaughter.
The Spaniards worshiped human sacrifice, too, but this was the wrong kind. There were tens of thousands of boys and girls who had been committed to monasteries and convents in Spain at birth and dedicated to a life of self-torture and sterility, but that was the right kind of human sacrifice. Those children were aging and dying and suffering and stinking in silence and behind walls.
The Aztecs were rolling their sacrifices down the stairs, on the Aztec equivalent of national television.
We have the same morality today. You can’t execute man, and you certainly can’t perform a public execution, but you can lock him quietly in a steel cage for the rest of his life.
Or you can let him out to go kill some more human sacrifices on the streets. As long as nobody is executed on television, and the bloody corpses of the killer’s victims are not shown on television, the whole thing is just fine.
Judeo-Christianity is alive and well!
“The Believer,” A Movie I Thought I’d Hate
I actually saw the movie about the Jew who became a Nazi. I was ready for the usual mile-wide and molecule deep story about Jews and Nazis, like the annual Holocaust movie that gets all the awards.
It even started the way I expected it to, and I settled back to two hours of Jewish Suffering.
It began with a sweet, studious Jewish kid being chased down by an Evil Nazi and beaten, just for being Jewish.
Then the Nazi knocked him down and started saying, “Hit BACK!”
Then we begin to find that this Nazi was a Jew. It showed him years before walking out of his Jewish junior high when the teacher was praising The Sufferings of Job. What kind of sadist was Jehovah, who did all that to Job because Satan challenged him to?
How could anyone find anything admirable about Job, who got kicked and blubbered and Loved the Lord and wanted more kicks?
He became violently anti-Semitic.
He hated the Jews as Sufferers, as wanderers, as relativists, as blaming everything on everybody else.
I loved the scene where the Psychiatrist faced him with, the Ultimate Weapon, Holocaust Survivors. A Holocaust Survivor (have you ever noticed how many millions there are, always readily available?) told him how his wife and children had been murdered before his eyes.
And he said, “So what the hell did you DO?”
The “man” said he did nothing.
The Nazi said, “Why didn’t you die fighting?”
Then the female psychiatrist had to explain there was nothing he COULD do.
She used the Ultimate Line: “You weren’t THERE!”
The Jewish Nazi said, “I would have died right there. I wouldn’t be here whining about it!”
There is plenty for the standard right-wing ideological grouch to grouch about in “The Believer,” but the leftists hated it, too.
“The Believer” was HATED by the ADL, which was horribly disappointed that it wasn’t another annual award-winning Holocaust movie. It is almost impossible to make a movie about Nazis and Jews and not win every available award, but I don’t think “The Believer” got a single one.
A major theme of “The Believer” is that Jews are just a group of people who exist to be hated. Without their being hated, he says, there would be no Jews.
They need it. They court it. They advertise it. They thrive on it.
The movie keeps emphasizing that Judaism consists of lots and lots of bobbing up and down, lots of ceremony, lots of worshiping The Holy Land with the Religious Right, but no RELIGION.
One point the movie keeps making is that there is no RELIGION in Judaism. There is only self-pity. At the end of the movie, this Jewish Nazi ends up giving his life to save Jews the way he told the Holocaust survivor he should have done. He hurts no non-Jews doing it. He is pointlessly sacrificing himself, because that is what a man should do in a hopeless situation.
And what is his reward? Once again, the point of the ending is that there is no RELIGION in Judaism.
He spends eternity chasing up staircases looking for a God who isn’t there. All he runs into, again and again forever, is his old teacher saying he may have had a point about Job.
Judaism is just self-pity and “a point,” according to this movie.
I have seen the anti-Semitic Nazi movies, and they are pathetic propaganda movies to show to an American. But “The Believer” exposes the non-existence of post-Holocaust Judaism, the self-pity and will to destroy everything and everybody that today’s degenerate Judaism represents.
If the ADL wants to keep earning its fat paycheck, it needs to show old Nazi propaganda films and showcase the Religious Right, whose greatest ambition is to be just like Jews. They make modern Judaism look good.
The ADL should sponsor the Religious Right and show Nazi anti-semitism. But the ADL needs to grab and burn every copy of “The Believer.”
The movie was written, produced, directed and all the rest by Jews. But they are obviously not your standard Jews.
The writer of “The Believer” understands sick modern Judaism as only a Jew can, and hates it as only a Jew can.





Reply to HS
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 5/8/2005
HS says:
“The current tax laws are unconstitutional and mostly voluntary. That’s been admitted even by judges.
So make up your mind.”
Just for clarity, I reply:
My point was not that religion shouldn’t have tax deductibility.
My point was that by giving tax deductibility to “religion,” the IRS must DEFINE it.
A good example is when the IRS took away Bob Jones University’s tax deductible status because, as a religious institution, it banned interracial dating on a Biblical basis.
Oddly enough, most of the major liberal churches went into court on Bob Jones’s side. Those churches are absolutely committed to ridding the world of the white race. But they realize that once the government defines “religion” to do that, they can go ahead and define “religion” any way they want to.
That is establishing religion by the Federal Government.
3 Comments