NOT SPAM
They say it’s “Uniquely evil” or a “singularity” because there has never been such a large scale, industrialized attempt at genocide in history.
But if all people are completely equal, and there are no races, the term genocide, which refers to “the systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group”, should be meainingless.
But as we are becoming inceasingly aware with the action in the Middle East, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994)
That makes Hitler sound moderate. I guess a different set of rules apply for Jews.
I just searched for stuff on ‘The Uniquely Evil Singularity’ and came up with an article on Historikerstreit [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historikerstreit ] which was an intellectual and political controversy in West Germany about the way the Holocaust should be treated in history. They point out some of your arguments in the Issues section. I guess that makes Bob an apologist for fascism, as Ernst Nolte.
Comment by Al Parker —
***** I am always surprised at how FAIR, comparatively speaking, Wikipedia is. Compared to other sources, believe it or not, the article Parker refers to is very objective.
***** As a political professional, the last sentence in the article you refer to gave me a chuckle. “The German people accept the (Holocaust was uniquely evil) position.”
**** I have spent a major part of my life trying to find out what the AMERICAN people accept or do not accept. That was my BUSINESS. I am professionally jealous of somebody who can simply state what the German people believe without fear of contradiction.
****** And they need not fear contradiction. Any German who answers a question about the Holocaust faces an automatic two-year prison sentence if he gives the wrong answer. I don’t know about Germans, but I can state flatly that that would make an American nervous. Germans are probably constitutionally different, b ut an American playing with a prison sentence would give the most extemely opposite answer he could think of.
***** Yes, Al, I know you know that.
***** It is interesting that a fascist apologist would demand freedom of speech, as Al well knows.
***** And if Germans freely accept the “uniquely evil” position, I must repeat a question that would only ocur to a naive American: Why do you need a two-year prison sentence to force people to say what they already believe?
#1 by Pain on 08/01/2006 - 8:29 pm
Wikipedia is only as fair as you make it. Anybody can edit an article there. Obscure articles do not attract the attention of Jews but they do not attract the attention of many others either.
Read articles on cults such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, The Local Church of Witness Lee, Adventism, etc. If you know enough about any of them you will see immediately that each article is written by the organization itself. The reason is that individuals willing to tell the truth have a life and other things to do. But a cult can put its full resources behind its propaganda, and since Wikipedia is free, it is worthwhile for it to assign one or two volunteers a week to make sure that the article represents only the cult’s point of view.
This is an example of a minority point of view winning out against the majority. In the big scheme of things, each cult, rich though it be, has little power or money in proportion to the whole earth.
#2 by Pain on 08/01/2006 - 8:51 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“They say it’s “Uniquely evil” or a “singularity” because there has never been such a large scale, industrialized attempt at genocide in history.”
Of course the uniquely evil singularity is the genocide Jews are performing on Whites and Western Civilization right now.
The previous singularities were the Jews’ murder of 80 million Russian Christians of the USSR (particularly under the bloody Leon Trotsky) and the perhaps one billion dead of the Jewish wars beginning with the War against Southern Independence* and culminating with the carnage of WWII. But it didn’t stop there. Jewish Marxism led directly to Mao’s murders and Pol Pot’s.
The international Marxism of Trotskyites has far surpassed the single-state Marxism of Lenin-Stalin in volume of blood shed.
*There’s too much too explain here. Suffice it to say that Webster and Clay were on the Rothschilds’ payroll and that Lincoln received loans amounting to 75% of the assessed value of all real property in the USA and CSA. The loans were given by international Jewish banking houses fifty years after that famous bet against Napoleon that launched the bloody Red Shields into power.