NOT SPAM NOT SPAM
mderpelding,
Very few Aristocrats tolerated Jews. Narceocrats tolerate and LOVE Jews. There is a difference. There are no Aristocrats and there have been no Aristocrats in hundreds of years. If there are any true Atristocrats around……we are it.
(Narceocrat may not be correct spelling for ‘rule by birth’ Bob correct the spelling —you wrote about this before)
Comment by Tim
*********** I coined a term I call naciocrats. I know a number of classical scholars, and tried it out on them. They sort of said it was all right.
I knew that naciocrat was that no-no of no-nos, a Latin beginning combined with a Greek ending. What I was looking for was a correction of “nacio” for the Greek term. Each of the experts acted as if they hadn’t quite heard me and said the term naciocrat was OK.
LibAnon can probably give me a straight answer.
Actually nacio is a Latin term, the basis of the present Latin languages term “nacion,” which means nation. It is related to the Latin word for “birth.” But every Latin country demands “assimilacion,” which means that anybody who is a good Catholic is part of their “nacion” regardless of birth. If you speak French, you’re French.
So naciocrat is probably wrong, but classical scholars approve it for a reason that few of us have learned to live with:
They don’t KNOW. When an expert acts like he doesn’t hear you, it is a signal that he doesn’t know.
So when Tim asks me for correction, I just admire his courage for going ahead and using narceocrat because what he has to say is more important than getting the exact term right.
The important point, as Tim points out, is that “aristocracy” is an absurd term. They are NOT “aristos,” the BEST. So they sell us out like any other clown does. They sell their lineage out the way they would sell anything else.
“Aristocrat” hell! They are trash with a family tree.
#1 by mderpelding on 08/03/2006 - 5:58 pm
NOT SPAM
Whatever the term is,
maybe we need to look for similarities
instead of more hairsplitting.
The upper class of the late
enlightenment share a common trait
with our modern corporate elite.
They all went to college.
Some perceptive fella even wrote
a book about how all colleges are
basically theological seminaries.
Some famous Jewish guy once said
(and I paraphrase) “a house divided against
itself cannot stand”.
So haggle over words.
I said that the elite in Europe turned over
there RACIAL bretheren to Jews.
That is the point.
Refute that point.
Save the language lessons for the intellectuals.
#2 by Tim on 08/03/2006 - 6:20 pm
mderpelding,
You stated your point better the second time around! On this blog, you must state yourself CLEARLY in the first place or end up confusing young fools like me. This blogs noble intention is to destroy wordism. Therefore, I must define things so we can argue/discuss things and all be on the same page. Thank you for the clarification.
Yes, you are correct. The Naciocrats and their modern relatives which I refer to as Corporate Feudal Lords sold us down the river. That is why I objected to them being called Aristocrats. They are anything but the best. And that is clearly your point as well. See that is why we go at it every few entries over the meanings of things like Aristocrat! Some people do NOT take words seriously and that makes them wordists. We are the antithesis of wordist (or at least I try to be).
#3 by mderpelding on 08/03/2006 - 8:16 pm
NOT SPAM
Tim, you are not a “young” fool.
I am not an “old master”.
I want you to think.
Kick my ass.
When you address something I say,
that means that I have hit upon something
that makes sense.
I Want my points refuted.
I want my people to THINK.
I have blood online.
White people aren’t abstractions.
WE ARE RACIAL KINSMEN.
#4 by LibAnon on 08/03/2006 - 8:45 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“What I was looking for was a correction of ‘nacio’ for the Greek term.”
A purely Greek version of “naciocrat” would probably be “genocrat”. The Greek word for one’s birth is “genos”, so their word for somebody of noble birth was “eugenos”, the prefix “eu” meaning “good”.
“Eugenos” is the word used for “noble” in the original Greek of 1 Corinthians 1:26 — “For behold your calling, brethren, that not many wise after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called.” As I read it, this verse expresses an opinion about aristocrats that’s pretty similar to Bob’s.
And yes, you don’t want to mix Greek and Latin roots. The idiot who coined the word “television” did that, and look what happened.
#5 by joe rorke on 08/04/2006 - 2:48 pm
Ho hum.
#6 by Pain on 08/05/2006 - 2:48 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Gennocrat?