http://news.discovery.com/history/king-tut-chariot.html

The article says that the chariots on display at the Luxor museum are the first, “Mechanical systems which combine the use of kinematics, dynamics and lubrication principles.”

The reason they are in a museum is that they are rare. They are at Luxor because Egypt has been examined for a thousand years more closely than any other civilization.

Anything that is in a museum in the most closely studied civilization in history is not likely to be the earliest anything.

I told a guy Zoroastrianism was limited to Aryans, so he looked up a New Age “Zoroastrian” site. He showed me that the page led off with “People of any race are welcome.”

I asked him if he had ever seen any OTHER religious site that started off with the statement that any race could join. Why was that its first sentence?

Obviously because real Zoroastrianism HAD a racial restriction.

It is hard to talk to people who do not understand the language. It is tiresome to be endlessly explaining what any adult should be able to understand immediately.

So the Soviet Constitution of 1936 did not say, “We Idealists and Intellectuals are going to sit in our offices and tell everybody else what to do.” What they said was that “the Soviet Union is a society of workers, farmers, soldiers and intellectuals.”

Which of these four groups is going to do the sweating and bleeding and which one is assigned all the thinking and giving orders? Obviously the intellectuals are going to sit in their offices and tell everybody else what to do.

But that is only obvious to me. Because I seem to be the only one who speaks the language.

What if a congressman gave you a book by a political group and said, “Tell me what it says.” It takes you hours to read it and you know what HE wants to know about it.

Are they left or right? Well, there is a lot in there denying they are socialists. If you want to keep your job, you do not Xerox those repeated denials that they are socialists. As with the Zoroastrians, the first question is why they have all those denials.

It is considered anti-Semitic to say that Jews can be motivated in any way by Hate. Every Saturday they say things about gentiles that, if gentiles said it about Jews, would constitute hate. Jews insist that Hate is the motivation behind everybody else’s actions.

Nobody is going to come right out and say he is motivated by hatred, but if you can’t deduce official Jewry’s real attitude from this.

There is nothing theoretical or cute about this. It is a matter of keeping your job.

On Capitol Hill, nobody SAYS that when one says “Middle East,” one means, first and foremost, Israel. When you listen to a conservative talking about Iran, you are instantly aware that the distinction between an attack on Israel and one on America is instantly lost.

Nobody SAYS that Israel is the only country in the Middle East, but if you don’t KNOW it you will never get a job on the Hill.

Israel is Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

You have never heard anyone denounce black extremists as “anti-white.” They are only referred to as “anti-white AND anti-Semitic.

No one notices this but professionals, much less asks WHY it is true.