Archive for November, 2015
Science Fiction Goes Senile
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 11/28/2015
When I was young, I loved science fiction. I went to some conventions.
Back then SF looked to the future. It demanded experimentation. In a world where population and per capita income both increased steadily science fiction was the cutting edge of demands for technological progress and optimism.
Now reading SciFi is like listening to an old man grumble to himself.
“None of these new-fangled things will do anything but cause disaster.” 
In today’s scifi, any population increase means starvation.
One story talked about the discovery of the secret of eternal life, and then showed how it was banned forever because a society that could extend life forever did not realize it might involve a population increase, and total disaster ensued.
The very idea is laughable, but nobody laughed.
They PUBLISHED this crap.
Today’s clowns READ this crap!
Science fiction is now “message media.” Each story is supposed to advance the “message.”
So, like all Marxist output, it is BORING.
Bob versus #AntiWhite Conspiracy Theorist
In Bob’s interview with CNN there were some revealing aspects.
The interviewer / #AntiWhite Conspiracy Theorist was desperately trying to make a connection between Bob and a killing that had happened in South Carolina. Bob flipped the tables repeatedly and brought it back to simple reality, showing up the #AntiWhite Conspiracy Theorist (#AWCT) as dubious and silly.
#AWCT: “If this kid, right, believes the same things you believe, that White America is under attack, and he pro-actively decided to go out and do something about that.”
Bob: “That’s the way you think?”
#AWCT: “I’m asking you.”
Bob: “You go shoot up” […/interrupted] #AWCT: “Of course not; I don’t.”
Bob: “I don’t either; well then why are you asking me?”
#AWCT: “I’m asking you if you think that” […/interrupted] Bob: “I don’t think walking into a church and shooting people is a good idea. I don’t think it’s that complicated. Is that really a complicated concept for you?”
The anti-White conspiracy theorist tried his best but he couldn’t handle Ol’ Bob.
…And of course Bob repeated our over-arching message:
“As I have said, immigration is only pushed on White countries. Everybody knows that. Not on Japan. Not on Taiwan. And the answer I usually get is ‘DUH’. But the fact is, we all know that.
“When you’re talking about Diversity, you’re ALWAYS talking about White people. Now if any other race were targeted in that way, there’d be some question about it. But you, the press, or whoever, they act like they’ve never heard of this before.”
#AWCT: “Well I just heard it, from you. So I’ll ask the question again. But you answered the question by talking about Japan and Taiwan. I’m asking you again. Do you feel the White race in the United States, to be more specific, is under attack?”
Bob: “The idea is to get rid of us. Yeah, that’s called genocide.”
…Bob’s points were so obvious and general that there was no getting around them. 
Now if you observe carefully what Bob says here too:
“The reason we’re driving them NUTS: Our motto is: We’re not going to talk about any specifics until you stop acting like a MOB. The whole media, the SPLC, the whole crowd. They start shrieking like Orwell’s sheep in his Animal Farm. As soon as somebody says something they don’t like, they start screaming ‘Two legs baa-ad, four legs good’. It’s a MOB!
They’re screaming, and they’re out for money and they’re buzzards. They’re waiting for something like this to happen. Then they can start screaming about something, and that raises good money.”
…By repeatedly characterizing the anti-Whites (interviewer included), using metaphors and pointing out their motivations, it was as if the interviewer were being put into a box he couldn’t get out of. The framework for this box was built by Bob from various angles, almost always sticking to general things everybody knows, and repeatedly reinforcing it with phrases to cement it:
“everybody knows”; “you know”; “we ALL know what you’re talking about and you do too”; “you know it very well”; “everybody knows that”; “the fact is, we all know that”; “you know damn well”; “you know it very well”; “we all know”.
Bob used at least ten such cementing phrases.
The interviewer couldn’t handle it. What Bob said was undeniable and it was being reinforced.
He knew it, Bob knew it, and everybody else knew it too.
What Jesus TRIED to Tell Them
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 11/22/2015
As BUGSERS you are very familiar with the fact, if you make any profound statement, people will grab it by the wrong end and totally foul it up.
As a child in the Bible Belt, I had a little white New Testament with Jesus’s words in red, and even then I realized that even the preacher — ESPECIALLY the preacher, never quoted Jesus’s words in context.
As I remember, Jesus gave us The Lord’s Prayer not as the Perfect Prayer to be repeated endlessly but as an illustration of the fact that, when talking to God, “It is enough to call a fish a fish.”
The Lord’s prayer says flatly that one wants to be provided for in this world and saved in the next. 
A fish is a fish.
Two times Jesus answered, “I don’t know.”
One time was when his disciples asked when would be the Day of Judgment.
He told them that that is known only by the Father.
The best example was when he said that a rich man had as little chance of salvation as a camel had of going through the eye of a needle.
As everyone who has used the simple truth of the Mantra would predict, the result of this quote has been an endless discussion of, in the time of Jesus, exactly what a needle was.
I have heard lengthy and learned discussions, perfectly serious ones, that for those In the Know, and there were decorations called “The Needle’s Eye” that Jesus referred to and which a camel might get through.
I have heard Learned Discourse on what Jesus theoretically meant by “camel.”
In short, like all BUGSERS, I have learned that if you feel like listening to a long, hilarious, pseudo-intellectual dialogue, the way to do is to state a simple truth.
Under the Hammer of Genocide
You can usually tell most about someone’s reaction via non-verbal signs.
If you carefully observe posture, breathing, eye movement, facial expression, etc. as NLP practitioners, or as interrogators, do.
If you see the person, hear their voice and notice pauses, then you can tell much better the effectiveness of a communication. 
During face-to-face encounters it is also easier to MAKE IT PERSONAL.
So I run by new memes in personal encounters.
Now I’ve used the following against resistant audiences and it was consistently THE point when their resistance broke:
“Your children are under the hammer of genocide.”
…
Wondering why this phrase is so effective, I found some reasons.
It is a metaphor: visual, brutal, immediate.
And it contains the word “under” – in the same category of words as “down” and “sub”. (See the article “Drawing in and ON the subconscious”.)
“Under the hammer” also has the meaning of selling off something. So White children are being sold out / betrayed. The conscious mind may not notice such things, but the subconscious / unconscious mind does.
White Children are Under the Hammer of Genocide.
Changing Governments While Nothing Changes
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, How Things Work on 11/16/2015
Two points:
1) when I need correction, I come here. As I have said many times it is much better to make mistakes here than out in the field.
2) The last thing I want to do is appear to use obscure information to make me look good, as so many AMPWs love to do.
When I talked about the importance of the coalition that got Hitler into power in the 1932 election, I went right into it as if you were familar with coalition-building.
As I remember from my political science days, The United States is the only country on earth in which the legislative and executive branches are elected separately.
In every other country, the “government” is elected by a majority of the legislative branch. 
France was famous in the 50s, until DeGaulle took over, for short-lived governments. I remember one, Henri Queuille, that lasted two days though he held office another eight days as a caretaker while a new coalition was cobbled together.
They could elect a Premier and other officials, then they would fall out with each other or one or more parties would drop out of the coalition and the government would resign, and/or lose a vote of confidence.
This year Britain went back to “one party government” when the Conservative Party won a tiny majority.
If you paid any attention to British politics, which is as boring and pointless as ours, a coalition of two or more parties formed one of their recent governments.
I can almost hear BUGSERS saying, “Well whoopteedo! We are supposed to be bored to death here by breathless announcements of which cuckservative gets ten more votes, and you expect us to keep up with British Liberal Democrats who make even less difference?”
True, nearly all other countries do use the Parliamentary system.
For nothing.
You already have an electoral system that means nothing.
Why should you keep up with another one?
Side Note:
A quote from the beginning of Stephen King’s “Kingdom Hospiral:”
“A hundred and fifty years ago in Maine, women and children worked sixteen hour shifts every day to make blue uniforms.
The blue uniforms were for men who were fighting to abolish “The Peculiar Institution.”
“The Peculiar Institution was slavery”
Only Stephen King could get away with that!
-
You are currently browsing the archives for November, 2015
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
Recent Comments