B. U. G. S.

In reply to my article saying proliferation means colonialism, Anonymous says:

“Is the agenda to get rid of white people, or is it to make sure that only white people have the Bomb? It can’t be both, Bob.”

Anonymous, despite your politics you are thinking like a John Bircher. You imagine some giant, centrally orchestrated, consistent Plot.

I am talking about the real world and what people are really thinking. Your clocklike precision simply doesn’t work here.

Look at my other article about pilots in Africa. Your logic would say, “They can’t be for a black government and not be for black pilots.”

The only problem with your theory is the Bob Problem:

It doesn’t WORK.

They DO prefer white pilots. They DO prefer black governments. Maybe not hte black government they HAVE, but black governments.

Your logic breaks down in analyzing real people’s real motivations. The same pro-Israeli Jew whose dream is a world without white gentiles is fanatically against non-whites having the bomb.

Not only are you wrong that it can’t happen, as your logic breaks down in the case of black pilots, the fact is you are surrounded by people who think BOTH things.

And not one of them knows he has this doublethink in his mind.

Doublethink in politics is routine. Logicking out what people SHOULD think just won’t cut it.

This leads us to vital point: blind hatred is suicidal. The blind hatred of white gentiles which most Jews mistake for “righteous resentment” is actually hate.

For whites to desire the end of the white race is the natural result of the kind of worship of sterility that Christianity adopted from the Manichaeans. What would be more natural than that a race which believed sterility is the highest good would adopt the attitude that its own end is the ultimate goal a true Christian should seek?

To pursue this goal, they have to insist that a world without any whites would be just as good as a world without them.

But Mark Twain defined “faith” as “Believing what you know ain’t so.” This is a wonderful illustration of what he meant.

Everybody wants to have faith in the equality of all races and to view the end of hte white race as a great, world-saving sacrifice. But that’s for our great-great-grandchildren.

But when you talk about NUKES you talk about NOW. You are not dealing with far-off future date when Mamma PC will make everything nice.

And, frankly, you are not talking about future generations any more. Youare talking about what will happen to somebody your idealistic neighbors CARE about.

THEMSELVES.

So if youthink non-whites should have the Bomb people say, “Have you lost your friggin’ MIND? You think a bunch of brown Iranians and black Africans and Orientals should have the BOMB!?”

It’s more coded than that, of course, but that is what it means.

Anonymous, you seem to be unaware that all your liberal friends who glorify diversity all the time could buy a house very cheaply in a black or Hispanic neighborhood and enjoy not only a low price but all the joys of multiculturalism.

Right NOW.

The real thing is ugly and nasty, but the faith of Poltical Correctness will take of that.

Somehow.

Someday.

You cannot be unaware that everybody around you agrees that former colonies should not have the Bomb. You cannot be unaware that they all agree that getting rid of the “race” problem, i.e., getting rid of whites, is the ultimate goal.

So why on earth did you pose such a sillly proposition?

You’re smarter than that.