When I became Director of Oversight for the House Education and Labor Committee, I appointed
a woman with full credentials as my Associate Director. I was genuinely surprised when the
male staff largely resented having a woman over them.
Everybody in DC wants to work on Capitol Hill. If you meet a receptionists thre, you can be
sure she could be a high-level secretary anywhere else — the demand for and pay of
secretaries in DC is espeically high.
Capitol Hill is even BETTER than the White House, because once you have Capitol Hill
experience, you are there to watch administrations come and go. White House people have
hell of a time getting a job on the Hill, because there is no substitute for THAT experience
in THAT place. So when I made her my Associate Director, it was a VER high place for her to
be.
Knowing me you can be reasonably certain this was not affirmative action.
This was in the early eighties when everybody declared loudly that there was no real
difference in the mentality of men and women. I never believed that, just as I never
believed anything else fashionable. Fashions come and go. Women, men, whites and
nonwhites were here long before and are here long after that fad died.
I needed a FEMALE Associate Director becuase of a term everybody thinks is nicer when they
spell it out: when are setting up a group from scratch using money on Capitol Hill that is
always in short supply, you need to cover your ass. They have been literally that for
infant males at least a hundred millennia, and no matter how great you are, you need some
version of that for the rest of your life.
This is a hell of an admission for an adult male to make, especially one who has been as
high up as I have. But the higher you go the MORE you need it. It is fact of life that the
big difference between a big man and a small man is that a big man makes BIG MISTAKES.
A woman can be a great advisor on high level mattes, but she will also make damned sure all
the bases get covered. A male associate director would respect me enough to ASSUME I had
taken care of things. My female Associate Director didn’t take a week to realize I was
balloon-brain, thought she deeply respeced me.
I had a very high level secretary. To give you an idea of how she had figured me out, when
I wrote a speech for one of our bosses, she would not let me TOUCH the final she had tyed
(no word processors then) until she had made a COPY of it. No matter how I chafed, because
by then I had thought about it and wondered if it needed changing, she kept the original and
gave me a copy.
My German legal secretary wife treated me the same way.
I remember when a Secretary of the Treasury was on an interview show and one reporter asked
him who dealt with his family money matters. He said he gave the checks to his wife. This
was considered funny, but nobody took it seriously. In fact there is an old, standard joke
abut it.
Somebody asks a regular guy about how he and his wife divided. He replied, “She handles the
little things and I make decisions on the major matters. She decides how my money should
be spent and I worry about the national debt.”
My Associate Director worked with me on policy matters, and never hesitated to tell me when
I had dropped the ball.
But she worried about “minor matters” too.
You see, when you drop the ball and make a major mistake by overlooking a “minor” matter, it
abruptly ceases to be minor, especially on Capitol Hill. After all, the reason you are
senior staff is precisely because it is YOUR job to do things so the congressman doesn’t
have to worry about those “minor” things.
If you have to cover someone’s ass, you had damned well better hire somebody who can cover
YOURS.
#1 by Mark on 08/09/2006 - 8:41 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“But she worried about “minor matters” too.”
This answers a lot of questions about why a woman will nitpick a man’s driving habits.
Every year on vacation my wife gives me grief about my driving. She watches the minor
matters — like when I cut someone off or if I miss my turn or I pass up the hotel or
restaurant for the fourth time… At some point I ask if she wants to drive instead
of me and she f i n a l l y quiets down.
But it’s those minor points that drive her nuts.
#2 by mderpelding on 08/09/2006 - 6:03 pm
NOT SPAM
Men focus on the “WHY”.
Women focus on the “WHO”.
Solving problems AND fending
off opposition is essential to
survival.
Any man who needs to do serious
problem solving needs a loyal
female sentinal.
Competition is fierce.
This brings up a sideways thought,
you mention that whites display a high
degree of sexual dimorphism and that white males
have low quantities of female hormones compared
to black males.
Wouldn’t that also suggest that black women are
less feminine than white women?
Do black women, for instance, have higher levels
of testosterone than white women?
Could we conclude that white females are highly
specialized?
The same for white males?
Optimal “division of labor”?
“allocation of rescources”?
Maybe we can convince all those “open borders”
Libertarians that white people are the
“productive” optimum.