Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Staying in Formation

Posted by Bob on September 20th, 2006 under Coaching Session


The piece below, addressed to Alan and Al Parker, is repeated below *** because it is so critical.

We are faced with the same thing over and over and over and over:

1) The other side gives us all sorts of arguments about “tolerance” and “the mixing of THE RACES.”

2) We state Bob’s Mantra and they accuse us being racists, naziwhowanttokillsixmillionjews. The we hit them with the HERESY argument. What is incredible here is that we have been facing the same two arguments for sixty years, but we never DEAL with them.

The Romans faced the same problem with both Northern Europeans and Oriental hordes. The hordes would come screaming down on them, each time. EVERY time the attackers did exactly the same thing.

Rome found a single solution to this, and Rome conquered the world with it.

That s0lution was called DISCIPLINE. Romans found that if they stayed in formation and fought as a unit, they NEVER lost. They ONLY lost whenthey tried to get inventive. The hordes would scream and taunt them. But the Romans STAYED in formation.

Staying in formation is SIMPLE. It is NOT easy. There is nothing easy, even for the most battle-hardened veteran, about keeping your mind on what you are doing when thousands of shrieking blood-thirsty attackers are running at you. So the Romans spent endless hours on Mars Field practising STAYING IN FORMATION.

You have a Mars Field right here on the Internet. You can copy and paste and find our every ruse the enemy will use without using your name and without embarrassment. To get out there and take them on live the way Lord Nelson did is advanced work.

Never BREAK FORMATION.

Like the shrieking hordes, our enemies have only ONE strategy. For sixty years we have tried to meet it with novel information, thick books, and arguments that make us feel knowledgeable. And that doesn’t make a dent in their lines.

They are out to destroy YOUR race and they are out to take waway YOUR freedom of speech. It is long, long PAST time that we hung onto those two points like bulldogs, that we stayed in formation like Romans, and took that crap OUT.

Let the hobbyists of revolution quote all their exciting new information on Conspiracies and news realeases and Inside Stuff.

WE have a WAR to fight, and bubbleheads are NOT the people who will stand shoulder-to-shoulder with you. Let them prance around and enjoy themselves.

Leave the women and children at HOME.

****NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I am new at this but i’ll give it a try. I think I understand how to attack the PC retards

as described by BOB. Never fall victm to their wordism charge that takes you off message as

one example. Bob did not fall for this tactic, he applied their retard logic and reversed it

on them, excellent. PC retards are the perverts on normal society, expose it for whet it is

and we crush their silly litte make believe world.

Comment by Alan

NOT SPAM

It’s interesting how quickly they resort to calling you a nazi when you talk about the Jews

or the “white” thing. They will insult you or try to discredit you any way they can and

evade arguing your points. Bob and Tim know that well. In a formal debate, those tactics

would be considered fallacious arguments.

Comment by Al Parker

ME:

Welcome aboard, Alan!

Alan and Al give me a chance to repleat my one-two punch. I wish Lord Nelson were doing this, since he is fresh from the field of action.

Alan, our first message, which you KEEP hitting them with is:

Bob’s Mantra

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says

this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and

ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or

Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote

assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY

white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if

hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black

countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am

talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black

man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the

white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

Al Parker,

You know the above, but we have developed this into a one-two punch.

Punch two deals with the only recourse they have:

HERESY!

Every society has its own word for HERESY! ( then spell it out with the caps and the exclamation point.)

In Communist countries all heresy is denounced as Fascism.

In Fascist Italy all heresy was denounced as Communism.

In our Politically Society you denounce all heresy as Racism.

This is supposed to allow you to refuse to answer me. This is supposed to give you the right to suppress my opinions. But in a free society you can’t hide behind labels.

Ther point is that our enemies only have TWO arguments. But we never DEAL with their ONLY two arguments.

I am urging you to take out their two arguments,and to talk about NOTHING else until they address genocide and suppressing our point of view.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Alan on 09/20/2006 - 2:04 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    I am happy to be aboard, it nice to be here with all you folks. As you might alreay know my name is Alan, I live in the Midwest, you know that so called “people of values” location. Let me point out something to all of you in reference to people of values statement. We have TOM Harken as a US senator, he portrays himself as a moderate. Tom “IS” in fact, a northeast liberal, Ted Kennedy, Barbra Boxer, phony liberal in sheeps clothing. I have always found it odd that he can fool voters this way, he says one thing yet his voting record says another. So how does Tom Harken do it? He plays on their ignorance, he knows the voters listen to words and fail to look up the hard facts, like his voting record. He just feeds them the same oats each time, medi scare, racism, I am a hunter bull shit and he survives. This time around I will use the internet to blow holes in his cloking devise.

  2. #2 by Alan on 09/21/2006 - 3:37 am

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    I like the reverse logic approach you used, it will stop them in their tracks every time. I can see their puzzeled look when you fire it at them, white people by the millions immigrating to a black nation. Their facial expressions would reflect shock and disbelief, the idea is insane, in a split second they wonder why any intellegent white man or woman would immigrate to a black nation. This is the kicker, they found the reverse logic horrifing when they pictured themselves actually doing this, they are racist. They think its ok to have the non whites come here by the millions because we are still a majority, thats security, the reverse logic approach would have them being the minority and that scares the shit out of them. So it can work both ways, this approach can help our cause in ralling our folks and maybe even convince the retards to see what their future has instore for them, I will surly use it every time.

  3. #3 by Lord Nelson on 09/21/2006 - 9:53 am

    NOT SPAM

    NOT SPAM

    I just want to say some things about my earlier comments.
    If anyone thinks the points I made were too base, and simplistic, then PLEASE, look at this (PROFESSIONAL) antis question again:

    “How do YOU, know Britain Has always been a White country since the beginning of time, were YOU, in Britain at the beginning of time????”

    Now ask yourself; what kind of IDIOT! would have stood there reeling off endless facts and statistics, just to counter such a baseless, and stupid argument?

    And yet, I hate to say this, but if you posted that same question on OV at Stormfront, you would see many good people (NOT ALL) doing exactly that.
    We have all been subjected to BILLIONS, of dollars of propaganda from the media, academia, mainstream politicians etc.
    And we may not like to admit it, but we are all carrying symptoms of this.

    Its NOT complicated.

    There is no logical reason why ANY race of people would ever want to become a minority, in their own countries.
    And every non White we will ever, meet in our entire lives already knows this.

    Like the coach says, this is about “GENOCIDE”.

    So lets Throw the facts, and stats, AWAY

  4. #4 by Antonio Fini on 09/21/2006 - 3:19 pm

    The heresy angle is also the BEST way to aproach holocaust revisionism, a subject which seems to obsess our side.

    I never waste time quoting numbers and studies to prove wether the big cookoff happened, didn’t happen or sort of happened. To a right thinking Aryan all that matters is that they’re putting people in jail for trying to amend the death figures by even one victim.

    THEY ARE PUTTING PEOPLE IN JAIL.

    Kidnapping them when necessary, and holding them in solitary confinement like mass murderers. I direct anyone who will listen to Google up Ernst Zundel, David Irving and Gemmar Rudolph then draw their own conclusions. What happened to these men is a more potent argument for our cause than piles of moldy Nazi documents and archaeological excavations at the alleged camps.

    If the story of David Irving doesn’t outrage you, then go back to your football game. We’ll let you know when the revolution is over.

  5. #5 by kane on 09/22/2006 - 12:30 am

    NOT SPAM

    They found a knights supporter certificate back at home, so I knew i was in trouble. I explained that I was mislead into thinking the group was different than it was and now the ccc is my thing, but they still were saying how “racist” is always bad. So I explained to them that the third world is pouring into white countries and only white countries, how every other group is advocating group interetsts, only whites are giving theirs up. How I don’t want America to become Mexico, white culture to die, or whites to be bred out of existance, and how I believed race is a legetimate scientific concept. It worked. The conversation ended there and the subject changed. I didn’t even get disowned. At 20 years of age out in the land of the professor priesthood, sometimes a little rebellion is a good thing.

  6. #6 by Alan on 09/23/2006 - 12:59 am

    Speech Code Demolished at Georgia Tech

    Dear Students and Supporters,

    As you get settled into your fall classes and routines, I am excited to bring you news of another recent victory for academic freedom. A lawsuit brought by two conservative students has demolished Georgia Tech’s speech code. Read on for all the latest details…..

    Court Order Brings Advance for Academic Freedom at Georgia Tech

    In response to a lawsuit brought by two of its students (one being Georgia Tech Students for Academic Freedom President Ruth Malhotra), Georgia Institute of Technology has agreed to the terms of a court order revising a speech code which administrators had repeatedly invoked to censor conservative activism on campus.

    The lawsuit was brought against Georgia Tech by Ruth Malhotra and Orit Sklar, both officers of the Georgia Tech College Republicans. During her sophomore year at Tech in 2004, Malhotra testified before the Georgia State Senate about facing discrimination and abuse in the classroom for her conservative political views and the need for an Academic Bill of Rights. One professor failed her after she attended a conservative public policy conference and openly belittled her political views in class.

    The university’s speech code banned “acts of intolerance,” including “any attempt to injure, harm, malign or harass a person because of race, religious belief, color, sexual/affectional orientation.” It also outlawed “denigrating written/verbal communication…directed toward an individual because of their characteristics or beliefs.” The revised policy omits these clauses.

    According to plaintiff and Students for Academic Freedom leader Ruth Malhotra, the policy was used repeatedly by university officials to censor conservative activism on campus, including an “Affirmative Action Bake Sale” (protesting racial preferences) and protests of a campus performance of Eve Ensler’s Vagina Monologues.

    “The speech codes and other unconstitutional policies have repeatedly been used against myself and my organization, the College Republicans, in the past,” Malhotra told SAF. “We’ve done activism events or displays relating to many hot-button issues, expressing alternative points of views, and those were often condemned or censored.”

    Under the terms of the court order, the university is forbidden from altering the new policy during the next five years without judicial approval. If they violate the order, they will be held in contempt of court.

    Commenting on the future impact of the legal victory, plaintiff’s lead counsel David French of the Alliance Defense Fund told SAF, “I think that this should serve as an example to universities, not merely that they should change their policies, but that students are no longer going to stand by and let universities trample their free speech rights. This is one of a number of challenges that are pending and more will come.”

    Join the Academic Freedom Movement

    The new semester is the perfect time to start up a chapter of Students for Academic Freedom on your campus or to recruit new members to your existing chapter. Deliver the message to your campus administration that abuse of students for their political, intellectual, or religious beliefs is unacceptable.

    For more information on how you can get involved and start up a chapter on your campus or if you wish to report an abuse of your academic freedom, please contact me at Sara@studentsforacademicfreedom.org or at my new toll-free number here in St. Louis at 888-527-3321. You can also find more information on our website at http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org.

    Look for more information and strategies on getting your trustees to adopt a version of the Temple Bill of Rights in my next letter.

    Yours in Freedom,

    Sara Dogan
    National Campus Director
    Students for Academic Freedom

    http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/

You must be logged in to post a comment.