Archive for September 13th, 2006

Stormfront Piece on Wallace

Boy! Kelso’s illustration from the 1972 primary takes me back!

Note the “Ashbrook 9%” there. Congressman John Ashbrook was my boss on Captiol Hill. He ran in the Republican primary as a protest against Nixon’s leftward movement.

While I was working for John, National Review had a cover article attacking me. It noted that I was trying to get the “Wallace Vote” allied with the Republican conservative base to elect Reagan as president.

Eight years later, the “Wallace Democrats” did join with conservative Republicans to elect Reagan president. At that point they suddenly became “Reagan Democrats” and National review declared it had been for that strategy the whole time.

But what was interesting on a personal note was that I was working as Ashbrook’s senior staffer and I showed the article to him. The first quote National Review used in the article, “From the Nashville Station,” was from John Ashbrook! He had said in 1972 that Wallace was not a true conservative, which he wasn’t.

Can you imagine the coincidence? John hadn’t seen the article yet and his own senior staffer, the subject of the article, showed it to him!

I talked with George Wallace in Montgomery when he was on his feet and later when he was in his wheelchair in 1976. A couple of coincidences there, too.

I drafted a letter praising my book, and Wallace was kind enough to sign it. It gave Wallace credit for being the populist leader he was.

It happened that when I was visiting him was exactly when Jimmy Carter, the Democratic nominee for president, was arriving in Alabama for Wallace’s endorsement against President Gerald Ford. But Wallace, in his wheel chair and relegated to a minor role, was MUCH more interestedin what I had to say about his glory days than he was in Jimmy Carter.

So Governor Wallace’s wife kept interrupting our talk with calls, “Carter is HERE! Where ARE you!?” We kept on talking.

Finally the phone rang and Wallace didn’t even bother to find out who it was. He said, “I’M COMIN”!!”

Wallace had read my book and he said, “If I had had you when I was on my feet we’d be in the White House now!”

I didn’t have the heart to remind him that I HAD been in his office when he was on his feet. There was a struggle about which group would run the Wallace campaign in South Carolina in 1968. Maurice Bessinger and I went to Montgomery to ask Governor Wallacethat we, who had the actual workers on our side, should run it.

Tom Turnipseed, who said he represented, “All the finest people in South Carolina” and who had the country clubs on his side, managed to persuade Wallace to give the campaign to his group.

South Carolina was the only Deep South state Wallace did not carry in 1968.

Turnipseed is a solid leftist now.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Simmons versus Antidisestablishmentarianism

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I think we are also at that point that as a political movement we could promise
liberation, liberation from PC and the goofs that lord it over us.

Comment by Simmons

ME:

The platform plank Simmons is advocating will begin:

“The established religion of the United States of America, Political Correctness, is hereby disestablished.”

Those who oppose this plank will be antidisestablishmentarians. I bet you never expected to see that word used in a sentence!

Ann Coulter’s new book, “The Church of Liberalism” is a straight steal from my “Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion.” So this concept is no longer a far out idea.

All outstanding student loans will be paid out of the giant reserves universities have. Harvard University alone has several billion dollarrs. The rest will be charged to professors and deans and contributors who have contributed tax-exempt funds to the Political Correctness seminaries we call colleges and universities.

We just got several million votes right there.

Other platform sentences:

“Under American laws, all monopolies are illegal. Two men in the same business are subject to criminal prosecution if they DISCUSS prices in their common filed of business.”

“By the same token, anyone who discusses graduation from a Political Correctness seminary as a qualification for hiring is subject to prosecution under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act.”

A few million more votes from people who waulify for Mensa but never finished college.

A million votes here, a million votes there, and it adds up to serious political clout.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

A Moot Question for You

Lester Maddox was a staunch segregationist who was elected governor of Georgia in the 1960s. Black riots were occurring all over the country. When a black riot took place in Augusta, Georgiaq, Lester Maddox stated that if any policeman did not SHOOT looters on sight, he personally would take away that officer’s badge.

The riot ended suddenly. Only one looter was shot. He was in a liquor store he had broken into, lying on the floor. That pitcure appeared in outraged publications all over America, especially Time Magazine. But though Time tried to make the case that the poor man was only getting liquor to take home to his starving family, it wasn’t very successful.

While I was on Capitol Hill ther was a hurricane in Florida followed by massive looting. My boss, John Ashbrook, shared his senior staffer’s gift for subtlety, so he made a speech on the House Floor called, “Shoot Looters!” The main newspaper in his district attacked him violently, saying this was an irrational statement to make. After a flood of letters backing Ashrbook came in, they decided it must be some kind of organized protest by Ashbrook supporters, so they did a scientific poll of the district.

They pointed out, with some embarrassment, that Eighty-One Percent (81%) of district residents backed Asbrook: “Shoot Looters!” More than one letter to the paper said that this was the first time the writer had EVER agreed with Ashbrook on ANYTHING.

I first broached the idea of aq Platform Party to Jamie Kelso as we were riding back from the DC convention. He LOVED the concept,but we had one strong disagreement. As you will see in an article below, I believe in SHOOTING anyone who comes across our border illegally. Jamie said Americans would not STAND for such a thing.

I would give a months warning in every publication in Mexico, Canada, and elsewhere. I would put up huge signs in Englsih, Spanish, French and various Indian labguages to make it clear that the US border is a DEADLINE, complete with skull and crossbones for the illiterate.

My point is this: Any other form of enforcement would be subject to debate.

We must make it absolutely clear that the US border is not a game of hide-and-seek.

We can say that America is the world’s last superpower, but it is the only superpower in history which wants nothing but to protect its OWN borders and its own people’s interests.

But the Preamble Party says that, on THAT point, there is no room for compromise.

Kelso says that is too violent. I say that any other approach makes the border a game of hide-and-seek.

Shoot looters. Shoot border violators. Our border is no longer a game.

There is a major side benefit to this. The United States will no longer speak in George Bush whine. We will speak little and MEAN it:

“Speak softly and carry a big stick.”

A country that shoots anyone who violates its borders can tell OPEC to cut the crap and OPEC will cut the crap.

What do you think?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments

The Preamble Party and Alaska

You are letting me down. I have not had a single comment on the Preamble Party Platform yet and I need them.

Alaska is a prime candidate for a Preamble Party to make a strong showing.

Alaska has problem that have led to an actual secession movement there. It has to do with the appropraition of Alaska’s resources by the rest of the country. As a political gesture, we need to side with Alaska on that.

There is another issue that has not been brought up. Alaska has the highest percentage of member of the National Rifle Association of all the states. But they can only drive to the “lower forty-eight” through Canada. At the Canadian border all weapons are confiscated.

All literature considered Hate by the Canadian Government is also confiscated and the carrier can be charged with a crime for it.

I know. Paul Fromm was carrying MY book and it was taken from him when he went home to Canada. My book was taken, questioned, and beaten, but after two months it was pronounced legal by the Canadian Thought Police.

But what bothers Canadians is the fact that they cannot take their guns with them across Canada to their own country.

There are a number of countries like Lsotho and Swaziland which lie completely within the borders of another country. To prevent their being isolated, international law recognizes that such countries have special rights to crossing the surrounding country’s borders. The surrounding country would otherwise have the right to a blockade or partial blockade against them, and a blockade is an act of war.

“The Platform Party completely supports the right of Alaskans to all the benefits of resources in the State of Alaska. No resouces may be taken from that State without due compensation, and compensation in fell.”

“Further, Canada has imposed a blockade on the State of Alaska. Citizens of Alaska are entirely separated by land from the rest of the United States, but Alaskans traveling to the rest of their country and citizens of the rest of the United States travelling to Alaska are subject to siezure of property which is legal in other states but not in Canada.”

“A blockade, even a partial blockade, in such a case is an act of war under international law.”

“The platform party will subject ALL Canadians to rigorous search and siezure until Canada ceases this practice against Alaskans en route to the rest of their country.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

The Preamble Party and the White Race

I cannot FIND my RECENT Blogs, though someone once found out for me where they were.

So I cannot give credit tot he commenter who gave me the site for The White People’s Party.

But there is a section of their platform I wnt to steal outright for the Preamble Party:

“ENDANGERED SPECIES”

“The White Race qualifies under existing law to be placed on the endangered species list Per Sec 4 of the 1973 Endangered species act (Determining Endangered Species) paragraph D which states (D) “the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms;” to protect the habitat, is cause for a species to be added to the list. Clearly, all relevant laws are working against the continued existence of Whites.”

ALSO:

I would also add Bob’s Mantra. Since so many of “We the People of the United States and our posterity” are white, and that Preamble was written to refer ONLY to whites and “Indians … taxed,” we have a special obligation to prevent genocide against my race.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments