B. U. G. S.

I HATE the pseuonym Nobody. That is exactly my opinion of people OUTSIDE this blog.

We have a world FULL of Nobodys. I resent hosting one more.

Pain accepted my pseudonym. I hereby formally ask “Nobody” to accept Anonymous, Jr. or think of something else.

Nobody, Anonymous, Jr., does not understand the doglike nature of America. Of course we don’t control our own cities and our own borders. Why should those matter to Israel?

It is a common confusion: Europeans cannot separate their inabiliy from our slavelike ability. They are two entirely different things.

Has it OCURRED to me? What do you think I have wasted my LIFE on?

You have completely ignored the point I made. I’m used to that. When my head is frozen, it will be the end of understanding this. People like you will keep trying to persuade me that being a bunch of slaves, a bunch of obedient dogs, is bad.

Hey, Nobody, hey Mark, try to imagine that I KNOW what you are saying.

Try to imagine that I am trying to say something, odd as it may strike you.

The routine opinions are 1) America is enormously powerful or 2) America is morally weak and slavish.

I am getting tired of repeating it, but America is enormously powerful AND morally weak and slavish.

The American militaryis tiny, tinier than the Roman legions relative to the Empire it ruled absolutely. But,as with the legions, there is nobody else.

So, instead of sitting around sticking their tongues out at how silly Americans are, the Jews see this reality and use it.

Meanwhile, others keep saying that moral weakness makes this power stuff all a lie. America can’t be all that strong, says Nobody, because we don’t have moral courage.

America IS all that strong. With moral courage we could be absolute.

Don’t give me platitudes and first century physics.

THINK.

HERE IS HTE DISCUSSION i AM REFERRING TO:

Bob quoted Mark:
how high are the stakes for Iran?

Mark

Bob replied:
MY REPLY ON STORMFRONT:

I’ve given your question a lot of thought.

One point I keep making and people outside my blog ignore is that America is not just the only SUPER power left in the world, it is the only POWER left in the world. Not one other country on the planet projects real military muscle outside its own borders.

In reply:
We can project the Form of “real military muscle outside (our) own borders.”

The substance – in terms of the effectiveness of that force to force substantial positive change – is rather a different issue.

Has it ever occurred to anyone that this is a tremendous net negative for America economically, with a power that can only be used once? Hasn’t the nature of war shifted from the capital-intensive heavily mechanized systems to intelligent organizations that are motivated by the common RACIAL dream of removing the RACIAL Invaders from their territory?

The example of Israel – with its spy satellites, F-16 fighters, advanced communications technology, and atomic weapons – being defeated by fourteen year old boys with hundred dollar Kalishnikovs in Lebanon last year, is stunning proof that the economics, indeed, the very nature of warfare, has changed, and the change is not in our favor.

Bob wrote:
Hell, France doesn’t have control WITHIN its borders.

In reply:
And we do?

Ever seen the membership numbers for the 18th Street Gang in Los Angeles, or how many illegals are in America?

Hell, DETROIT doesn’t have control WITHIN its borders.

Bob wrote:
For this reason, the United States is EXTREMELY dangerous

Never forget the lesson of the Sword of Damocles.

In reply:
I think this is a stronger metaphor than you realized. Remember, the Sword of Damocles can only be used ONCE.

Once the Sword of Damocles has been used, a wide range of flexible political options are permanently foreclosed. The issues are crystallized, the facades are removed, and everyone knows where they really stand. Possible alliances are nor foreclosed, and everyone moves down an ever-narrowing corridor.

Bob wrote:
And America is Israel’s pit bull.

In reply:
It is the perception of many that America is SOLELY Israel’s put bull, and America does SOLELY what Israel wants, in the Mid-East, and certainly does not conflict with Israel’s interest, beyond the Mid-East.

Bob wrote:
I don’t know if you are old enough to remember when Reagan bombed Libya. The American attack planes were allowed to take off from Thatcher’s Britain but they were not allowed to fly over any other country. They made a zigzag around Europe and through the Strait of Gibraltar and returned by the same zigzag route.

In reply:
The greater irony, it seems, is that, America, on “evidence” that seems less rational, than a rationalization, took action against an enemy of Israel. All of the other countries in the region, and beyond – saw this in that context.

Their political memories are strong enough to realize their superiors were right, then, and they will be right, now, to judge ALL American actions in the light of America as the shabbas goy of the goddamn JEWS.

Bob wrote:
All the respectable conservatives are demanding that Bush bomb the nuclear facilities in Iran. I don’t know if even Tony Blair would allow the attack planes to take off from Britain. The Iraqi Government now controls its own air space, and they wouldn’t.

In reply:
Blair will do what we tell him to do; however, as we look to the Muslim demography of New Londonistan, it is hardly likely that this will ignored by their Muslim brethren.

*** Good stuff. But in real politics, Blaire can’t do what we tell him to do. Losing a vote of confience brings up a new election.

This might not be the much-heralded Clash of Civilizations, so much as it is the Clash of RACES – with the White RACE as the proxy for the goddamn JEWS.

Bob wrote:
That could mean that the air assault conservatives demand would be American planes taking off from Israel. Can you imagine the reaction to an air attack on Iran from ISRAEL by the United States?

In reply:
Oh, yes.

Bob wrote:
The usual reaction is to say that the United States couldn’t take the heat for that. But let me repeat, THERE IS NO OTHER POWER ON EARTH EXCEPT ISRAEL’S PIT BULL. The United States could invade Iran with the whole world screaming its effeminate little head off.

In reply:
The United States could take the heat, for a while.

However, this would tell the rest of the world that our facade of being anything more than an irrational bully would be revealed, and there will be a tremendous shift in “world opinion” away from us.

And, this shift will take many forms, such as creating alliances where there weren’t any before.

An example might be the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan; incredibly long supply lines, and the use of cost-effective hand-held weaponry by the Mujaheddin, set the stage for the collapse of Empire – the Soviet Union.

I suspect the effect will be no less profound, for us.

Bob wrote:
Don’t fool yourself. When it comes to getting out in the field, there is no armed force on earth that face the Americans even briefly. That would mean terrorist attacks, but do you think that is more important in Washington than taking out Iran if Israel REALLY insists on it?

The Sword of Damocles is over Iran.