Bob- can you expand on what you think total collapse would be like? How would it be different from a catastrophic breakdown?
ME:
This relates to a very big lesson in human thinking that I heard expressed in a documentary on the Kennedy assassination:
“People assume that big things cause big things.”
The idea that a little failure like Oswald could change history by shooting Kennedy, who became an Instant God at death, is simply unbelievable to human psychology. There had to be more to it.
It was assumed the Soviet Empire would last, literally, forever. The Soviet Empire was in science fiction books. No one believed it would just collapse because it was so SILLY.
In fact, the ONLY scenario anybody had of the USSR falling was Mutually Assured Destruction in action, total nuclear war: Only a BIG thing can cause a BIG thing.
NOBODY believed Reagan would take it out in one decade. EVERYBODY takes it for granted now. In fact, the media insist Reagan had nothing to do with it. They all knew it was on its way out anyway. That is the official line.
If Perot had been marginally less insane, the official line would be that everybody knew the two-party system was on the brink of collapse so, of course, President Perot was inevitable.
So the Revolution to overturn our present genocide against whites is now seen as the result of a titanic race war, whereas our revolution, here, will be seen as what was bound to happen soon.
Back to another blog rule:
“Why do people say things?”
Drama SELLS. Drama is exciting.
Screaming Conspiracy and blaming everything on an All-Knowing and all powerful Evil takes all the blame off of you and you have fun. It keeps you from doing what needs to be done, every day.
You can have all the thrills, all the money, all the fame, all the titles. We just want to rule the world.
#1 by Pain on 07/27/2007 - 3:34 pm
But Mad Max in Thunderdome was a good movie anyway. (Mel Gibson led the people after the Big Collapse destroyed the world.)
#2 by Hardric on 07/28/2007 - 9:09 am
A big wave is coming. It says Racial/Tribal instincts and loyalties.
Ride the wave!
#3 by woundednietzsche on 07/28/2007 - 12:13 pm
In having conversations with “those who can be saved”, I do discuss race issues in the context of a larger conspiracy. Usually because the fence sitters see the current race/culture wars as some natural chaotic expression of society. They do not comprehend why anyone would “want” to have these things happen to our nation and the white race. If you can help them begin to see events/policy/media as a concerted ongoing interlocking program aimed directly at them, at their children, they are more willing to do something about it, and at the very least find the courage to think outside the idiot box. Who wants to fight mother nature? Not me. Who wants to fight the media-brainwashers, the deniers of instinct, the cultural-marxist sappers who are destroying my tribe, my culture? Everyone does, who does not hate himself.