Lord Nelson on Stormfront has made one of those inevitable wobbles we are going to make as we experiment with variations in the Mantra.*** He has changed it to the fact that antis all demand that minorities OUTPOPULATE whites in white countries.
This is a subtle slip you need a pro like me tt see. Unbeknownst to LN, he is falling into the hands of the respectable conservative, anti-immigration crowd. You do not DESTROY our race by outpopulating it The world has always been mostly non-white, and the middle of the Congo today, regardless of immigratin, is closer than the next state was a century ago.
SELECTIVE non-white immigration is just as genocidal as open borders, if not more so.
You destroy us by INTERMARRIAGE, which is the Holy Grail to respectable conservatives and “Christian” conservatives like Pat Robertson. The Mantra is heresy because it throws intermarriage right in there.
STAY ON MESSAGE!
We are fighting GENOCIDE, not IMMIGRATION!
*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
#1 by Lord Nelson on 08/02/2007 - 11:40 am
Well coach, this is a curious dilemma for all of us.
Let me say that I accept your point, but there are two problems here.
The first one is a simple misunderstanding between Americans and Europeans.
But the second is a more serious problem when it comes to using wordism in a debate.
Before the White race is wiped out, there would have to be a point where our race is first out-populated in Europe and other White countries.
But at the same time, there are already enough non Whites in our lands for subtle progressive race mixing propaganda to (over time) destroy us.
First I will give my thoughts on misunderstanding:
The biggest reason I can see for the misunderstanding on this issue is geography. The USA is a massive country. And to many Americans the thought of a piece of land maybe three times the size of France, with a Pro White Constitution, Government, Media, secure borders etc. may appear an attractive compromise.
To a European. The thought of non Whites taking over France, Germany, UK, Denmark, Sweden etc. with maybe us natives getting a few square miles in each of those ancient countries, like animals in a safari park is sickening.
Many times when I see a US Stormfronter say, “the official WN position is just to have our own piece of land” I want to throw up.
On the surface my choice of wording may sound Neo Con, but in reality it is not.
I am 100% in agreement with you about race mixing. And of course apart from cold blooded murder, its the only way to achieve GENOCIDE.
But there is another problem.
In the heat of debate, any anti can say “just find a White person of the opposite sex, and have more White children” or “no one is stopping Whites from having White children.
Most hardcore White liberals have White children.
Its the perfect cover for antis.
The people who program antis know full well that this would be a game were we have EVERYTHING to lose and NOTHING to gain.
It would be a bit like me playing poker with someone for their own house.
The (Anti Challenge) thread is full of antis using this time and time again.
Again, I am completely AGAINST race mixing.
But the problem is, any anti would simply answer “no problem, just find yourself a nice white girl and get on with it”
I would say that the high priests of the multi-cult know full well that filling ALL White countries with non Whites, COMBINED with racemixing being encouraged in the media will eventually result in GENOCIDE!
And there is not enough luck and Viagra in this world for me to do anything about that. (though it would be fun trying)
Immigration and racemixing, are a two pronged attack on our race.
One is not half as efective without the other.
So I will include assimilation or race mixing, alongside out-populating or immigration, in the future.
Maybe this could be an interesting topic for others in this seminar.
#2 by richard on 08/02/2007 - 12:44 pm
The problem I see with Lord nelson’s version is that we’re trying to get across the concept of the genocide of the white race. If you’re outpopulated you still exist, but if you’re completely mixed with non-whites, you don’t exist. Outpopulation isn’t genocide, assimilation is.
#3 by shari on 08/02/2007 - 1:00 pm
I have never been to the UK, although the majority of my ancesters haled from various parts of it. I think it would make me sick to go now and see tons of brown and black faces speaking with various British accents. That’s just freakish!
I don’t want my descendents speaking spanglish or sporting kinky hair or being a minority absolutely everywhere either.
#4 by danerebor on 08/02/2007 - 1:02 pm
At least in the U.S., non-white immigration is really snapping lots of whites out of their PC delusions. I don’t see why we can’t talk about both non-white immigration AND race mixing as major threats.
If we put in “Latin America for the Latinos” for all those Hazelton, PA supporters, we can really broaden the mantra’s appeal and harness all that anger…
#5 by Lord Nelson on 08/02/2007 - 1:27 pm
richard.
There is no Lord Nelson version.
I think its agreed that both, out-populating and race mixing need to be addressed together.
But I was trying to point out that out-populating maybe an essential first step towards genocide through assimilation.
Its the temptation of taking the least path of resistance.
#6 by Hardric on 08/02/2007 - 1:38 pm
As I see it, immigration puts them in your nation and assimilation puts them in your family. Like love, marriage, and the proverbial baby carriage, they are all steps in the same game. And the planet is not infinite, so this nonsense about “go out and make all of the White babies you want” is just that: Puerile nonsense. Maybe this is how we should deal with a cockroach invasion. Outbreed them. Australia overrun by rabbits? No problem, outbreed them
Americans have to listen to the “you stole it from the indians” garbage, but how can anyone even suggest to a European the obligation to have a single non-white in their country?
Do you know of any successful sports team which has defense only? Of course, if the players are all Respectable Conservatives, then they have two strategies. Hold the line and retreat. 🙂
But I’m no conservative and barely respectable.
#7 by Lord Nelson on 08/02/2007 - 2:10 pm
Hardric
“Maybe this is how we should deal with a cockroach invasion. Outbreed them. Australia overrun by rabbits? No problem, outbreed them”
Quality!
Think I might use this.
#8 by Ian Santiago on 08/02/2007 - 2:20 pm
Hardric,
It seems that my Galician-Spanish forbearers were here FIRST!As such, I will allow all Whites to stay but the minority interlopers will have to leave! hehehehe
Did first Americans come from Europe?
Archaeologist suggests prehistoric hunters from Spain sailed west
LiveScience
By Bjorn Carey
Updated: 8:46 p.m. ET Feb 19, 2006
ST. LOUIS – The first humans to spread across North America may have been seal hunters from France and Spain.
This runs counter to the long-held belief that the first human entry into the Americas was a crossing of a land-ice bridge that spanned the Bering Strait about 13,500 years ago.
The new thinking was outlined here Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science……..
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11451616/
Yikes, it seems that my Galician ancestors were also the original Celts! It’s no wonder why i get on so well with Confederates and the Irish kids that I grew up with in Boston.
Geneticists find Celtic links to Spain and Portugal
09/09/2004 – 17:47:04
The Irish and Scots may be as closely related to the people of Spain and Portugal as the Celts of central Europe, it emerged today.
Historians have long believed the British Isles were swamped by a massive invasion of Iron Age Celts from central Europe around 500BC.
But geneticists at Dublin’s Trinity College now claim the Irish and Scots have as much, if not more, in common with the people of north-western Spain.
Dr Daniel Bradley, genetics lecturer at Trinity College Dublin, said a new study into Celtic origins revealed close affinities with the people of Galicia
“It’s well known that there are cultural relations between the areas but now this shows there is much more,” Dr Bradley said.
“We think the links are much older than that of the Iron Age because it also shows affinities with the Basque region – which isn’t a Celtic region.”
“The links point towards other Celtic nations, in particular Scotland, but they also point to Spain,” he added….
http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/09/09/story165780.html
Viva La Raza Blanca!!
#9 by Dave on 08/02/2007 - 3:32 pm
The important point is that the colonial situation of earlier centuries has now been universalized under the regime of Political Correctness.
Accordingly, the issue BW raises of genocide versus immigration is of supreme importance. Make no mistake globalism is a regime of white supremacy. That is why the whole world wants to speak English.
But it is a reckless regime of the super wealthy. Our task is to avoid being destroyed by it.
Read BW posts under History at http://www.nationalsalavation.net on the issue of how elites regularly soil their own nests through arrogance and hubris. And that is what Political Correctness and globalism really are, regimes of arrogance and hubris.
#10 by mderpelding on 08/02/2007 - 9:18 pm
“Most hardcore White liberals have White children.”
Nope…
Hardcore liberals have no children. At least white children.
The hated “red state” people have white children.
#11 by Prometheus on 08/03/2007 - 5:47 am
This is an important point to remember. When an anti says that we are free, it is not OUR freedom to mate that we are arguing for.
We are arguing AGAINST THEIR IDEALS. Against THEIR program of genocide.
What anti’s are arguing for, is the assimilation of non whites with white in ALL and ONLY white nations
Anti’s are free to mate with non-whites and produce the coffee coloured children they envisage the world to be. They don’t have to promote this idea to everyone, but they do.
What liberals want is a situation where the white race ends. The success they achieve, or not achieve is irrelevant. The point is what they are TRYING to achieve.
You can argue that someone who advocates genocide, but is so far unsuccesful is innocent, but they aren’t.
#12 by Pain on 08/04/2007 - 1:09 am
Some venues don’t allow say more than 500 characters, so I take piece of the blog out. I like to show genocide with the fact that there are more than 100 million aliens in the USA right now. I used it back in 2000, but nobody believed me even when I proved it. But now it has gotten some press, so since people believe only what is officially announced in the press, I am believed now.
What is your gut reaction to using that figure?